TITLE

Performance indicators in Swedish Health Care

AUTHOR(S)
Heurgren, Mona; Åberg, Anders; Köster, Max; Ljung, Rickad
PUB. DATE
January 2007
SOURCE
BMC Health Services Research;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Summary Sweden has developed national performance indicators to measure quality and efficiency in Health Care. The indicators will be published on a yearly basis on a County Council level. Aims The aims are to: 1) Report on the achievement of the counties for the purpose of transparency and accountability 2) To encourage management in health care to start activities to improve performance The first indicator set was published in 2006. There was a great interest in the work and a waste majority of the Swedish county councils have now started a local work in connection to the national work. Next report on performance indicators will be published in October 2007. Background Sweden has a decentralized health care system with 2O County Councils/Regions and one municipality with a high degree of autonomy. The counties both finance and manage the health care activities in each county. In this context there has been hard to get a national picture of quality and efficiency in Swedish health care in all. The aim is to find methods to measure if Swedish health care is: Evidenced based, Efficient, Responsive, Accessible, Equal, Safe. Work started in 2006 to develop national performance indicators for open comparisons in health care. The project is a joint project between The National Board of Health and Welfare, The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions and the County Councils. Data Data have been collected from a number of databases, for example The National Health Data Registers, National Quality Registers, The National Waiting Time database and The Patient Satisfaction database. Methods The counties are compared from four different perspectives; 1) Quality of Care 2) Patient Satisfaction 3) Access 4) Costs and Productivity. A working group has developed the indicators and the final indicator set is then decided by a steering group. All indicators have also been discussed with the counties before being published. Results In year 2006 a first indicator set was published embracing 57 performance indicators from four different perspectives of quality and efficiency in health care. The comparisons where open and presented on county level. The majority of the indicators reflected quality from a clinical perspective, for example disease based mortality rates or measures for patient safety. The indicator set also reflects measures for access, patient satisfaction and for health care costs and productivity. Discussion The work received a great interest from the county councils but also from the public and the press. A new report will be published in October 2007. Areas of discussion For the year of 2007 we expect to have about 70 national performance indicators in the national indicator set. Examples from the comparisons will be presented and discussed in the full paper. The results from last year suggested that there is no obvious connection between costs and quality therefore all counties have an opportunity to improve efficiency in health care. There are also quite big differences between the counties in the results for some indicators. We will discuss these issues in the light of the findings in new results for year 2007. There will also be a discussion about quality in data and a report on the efforts that have been made to obtain better data quality in health care.
ACCESSION #
35701893

 

Related Articles

  • Annals of Occupational Hygiene Performance Indicators, 2009. Ogden, Trevor // Annals of Occupational Hygiene;Jun2010, Vol. 54 Issue 4, p367 

    The article lists the 2009 records of occupational hygiene performance indicators.

  • Data, business analytics and a knowledge economy. Jones, Steven D. // Grand Rapids Business Journal;12/7/2015, Vol. 33 Issue 49, p12 

    The author discusses aspects of amount of data and information generated by organizations, including importance of key performance indicators, social networking company's need to manage text and videos from over a billion of visits and role of database organization skills in business analytics.

  • DATA POINTS.  // National Real Estate Investor;Dec2007, Vol. 49 Issue 12, p2 

    Several charts are presented depicting the monthly industry trends in the U.S. in December 2007, including residential mortgage debt and 10-year treasury yield.

  • Aspermont ISD meets Adequate Yearly Progress.  // Stonewall County Courier (Aspermont, TX);8/30/2012, Vol. 25 Issue 36, p1 

    The article informs that according to the result of the Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) released on August 8, 2012 in Aspermont, Texas, Aspermont ISD met the requirement of AYP for the 2011-2012 performance indicators.

  • INNOVATIVE METHODS FOR MEASURING PERFORMANCE IN THE COMPANIES OF THE METALLURGICAL INDUSTRY. Bostan, Ionel; Roman, Costica; Grosu, Veronica; Condrea, Petru P. // Metalurgia International;Aug2009 Special Issue, Issue 8, p190 

    The main objective of this paper is the evaluation of the performance of the companies in the metallurgical industry, with the help of innovative evaluation methods, of which efficiency and accuracy is superior to the traditional methods used until the present. In order to observe same leading...

  • RAISING YOUR GAME. Leigh, Paul // Third Sector;4/23/2013, Issue 749, p19 

    The article discusses the use of key performance indicators (KPI) and process improvement in order to boost performance, particularly in the charity sector in Great Britain.

  • The French fry connection.  // Food Engineering;Sep2006, Vol. 78 Issue 9, p94 

    The article offers information on Recovery, an internal key performance indicator software developed by McCain Foods.

  • PERFORMANCE INDICATORS. Gooiker, G. A.; Tollenaar, R. A. E. M. // BMJ: British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition;8/14/2010, Vol. 341 Issue 7768, p317 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "How to Identify When a Performance Indicator has Run Its Course," by D. Reeves and colleagues, published in the April 6, 2010 issue.

  • Latest issue of FE Choices gives employers' views.  // 14-19 Learning & Skills Bulletin;1/27/2012, Issue 44, p2 

    The article reports on the release of the web based publication "FE Choices," which gives performance indicator scores for 2010-2011 for success rates, learner satisfaction and employer satisfaction.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics