The Effect of Competition Intensity and Competition Type on the Use of Customer Satisfaction Measures in Executive Annual Bonus Contracts

Clara Xiaoling Chen; Matsumura, Ella Mae; Jae Yong Shin; Yu-Ching Wu, Steve
January 2015
Accounting Review;Jan2015, Vol. 90 Issue 1, p229
Academic Journal
This paper empirically examines the interactive effect of competition intensity and competition type on the use of customer satisfaction measures in executives' annual bonus contracts. Specifically, we predict a stronger association between competition intensity in an industry and the use of customer satisfaction measures in executives' annual bonus contracts when the competition is non-price-based than when the competition is price-based. Using hand-collected data from Standard & Poor's (S&P) 1500 firms' disclosures of the use of customer satisfaction measures in executive bonus contracts in 2006 and 2010 proxy statements, we find results consistent with our prediction. Our results are robust to alternative measures of competition type and competition intensity. We also find similar results when we use the weight on customer satisfaction measures in executive bonus contracts as the dependent variable. Our study extends the literature on the effect of competition on the design of managerial incentives by distinguishing between competition intensity and competition type, and providing the first large-sample empirical evidence on the joint effect of these two dimensions of competition on the incentive use of an important nonfinancial performance measure.


Related Articles

  • TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS: EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. Conyon, Martin; Gregg, Paul // Economic Journal;May95, Vol. 105 Issue 430, p704 

    This article considers the issues, evidence and outline possible ways in which one may wish to reform pay setting practices for top executives in Great Britain. The evidence of restructuring of the overall compensation package received by senior management. The use of share incentive schemes or...

  • How to Make Pay for Performance Pay Off. Landsberg, Richard D. // Journal of Financial Service Professionals;Nov2009, Vol. 63 Issue 6, p12 

    This article discusses the best way to set up an offer of extra incentive pay to employees to meet certain deadlines or goals. Companies that engage in pay-for-performance plans need to be innovative in how they present their plan. Some executives believe they can outperform whatever their pay...

  • Rock-Solid Results from Simple Praise. Marin, Dave // American Banker;4/7/2006, Vol. 171 Issue 67, p11 

    The article discusses the importance of public recognition of employees' accomplishments. The author tells the anecdote of a former employee approaching him at a function, and letting him know that many years later, she still had and displayed an award he had given her for achievements in sales....

  • DIVERSIFICATION STRATEGIES AND MANAGERIAL REWARDS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY. Kerr, Jeffrey L. // Academy of Management Journal;Mar1985, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p155 

    This study examined the relationship between diversification and the design of managerial reward systems in 20 large industrial firms. Interviews with 89 compensation specialists, strategic planners, and line managers provided data on performance issues such as performance definition,...

  • Corporate Payout Policy and Managerial Stock Incentives. Fenn, George W.; Liang, Nellie // Working Papers -- U.S. Federal Reserve Board's Finance & Economi;1999, p1 

    This paper investigates the policy of corporate payouts and managerial stock incentives. The authors consider how corporate payout policy is affected by managerial stock incentives using data on more than 1100 nonfinancial organizations between 1993-1997 and find that management share ownership...

  • Has sky-high executive pay had its day? HUBBARD, JESSICA // Finweek;7/24/2014, p7 

    The article discusses a report released by advisory firm PricewaterhouseCoopers which noted that it has become common practice for executive pay increases to be in line with the rest of the workforce. Topics discussed include an international trend towards more "Say on Pay" for shareholders with...

  • Curbing the incentive scheme. Hasenfuss, Marc // Finweek;4/17/2008, p34 

    The article provides information on the development of the long-term incentive scheme (LTIS) at JSE Ltd. According the company's 2008 annual report, top 5 directors of the company have received almost 18 million Rand in the year ending in December 2007 due to the accelerated payments of its...

  • Incentives grow entrenched as motivating agency tool.  // Advertising Age;12/2/1996, Vol. 67 Issue 49, ps4 

    This article reports on the increasing use of incentive pay through bonuses or other pay schemes by advertising agencies in the U.S. in 1996. Performance bonuses are not skewed to any particular agency size, although they tend to be slightly more prevalent in the East. However, the West also is...

  • Cha-Ching! High Yield Brings High Bonuses. C. J. C. // Bank Loan Report;11/16/2009, Vol. 24 Issue 44, p2 

    The article offers information on the 2009/2010 Global Financial Overview & Compensation Report released by Operations Group. According to the conpensation study, leveraged loan and high yield bond professionals are posed to receive a bunos of 45% to 50%. Examples of these professionals are...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics