UK lobbies EU for 'light touch' energy goals

February 2015
ENDS (Environmental Data Services);Feb2015, Issue 480, p8
The article discusses the lobbying efforts of the British and Czech Republic governments urging the European Union (EU) to take a strategic approach on the governance and enforcement of climate goals in 2015. The governments are expecting a regime supporting an agreement among member states to reduce carbon emissions by 40% by 2030 that is not demanding and non-legislative. They also urge the EU to give more attention to carbon capture and storage (CCS).


Related Articles

  • EUROPE'S CARBON MARKET HOLDS LESSONS FOR THE U.S. Kanter, James // Rachel's Democracy & Health News;6/19/2008, Issue 964, p1 

    The article reports on the skepticism over the proposed carbon footprint reduction of the U.S. government in view of the failure of the European Union (EU) to effectively implement its carbon policy. It provides an overview of the current condition of Europe's carbon market as well as notes the...

  • "Being able to emit a tonne of carbon for less than the price of a cappuccino has made policymakers wonder how the long-term targets will be met". Ferdinand, Marcus // Utility Week;6/27/2014, p21 

    In this article, the author discusses the structural reform of the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) to achieve long-term emission reduction target and to design an automatic adjustment mechanism of the auctioning volume of carbon emission.

  • UK's favoured CCS bids announced.  // Modern Power Systems;Apr2013, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p5 

    The article informs that two bidders have been selected for the Great Britain Carbon Capture and Storage Commercialisation Programme Competition by the Department of Energy and Climate Change. It states that the department has selected two trust organisations including Aberdeenshire,...

  • DOE awards three large carbon sequestration projects.  // Advanced Materials & Processes;Dec2007, Vol. 165 Issue 12, p17 

    The article reports that the U.S. Deparment of Energy has awarded three-large scale carbon-sequestration projects, the largest such plans in the U.S. to date. The plans call for the storage of one million or more tons of carbon dioxide in deep saline reservoirs in three separate locations. The...

  • A breath of fresh air. Baker, Chris; Garside, Chris // EG: Estates Gazette;7/16/2011, Issue 1128, p68 

    The article argues for the need to consider regulation of decentralized supply of carbon and to deal with conflicts between zero carbon emission policy and legislation in Great Britain. Under the European Union (EU) Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, regulated emissions in new buildings...

  • Cross party report slams government CCS decision. Excell, Jon // Engineer (Online Edition);2/10/2016, p3 

    The author shares insight on a report published by a cross party energy and climate change committee in Great Britain which criticized the British government's decision to withdraw its support for carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology. He ponders on the commercial sense of the decision and...

  • India to have roadmap for cutting carbon emissions.  // CFA Newsletter;Jun2014, Issue 65, p21 

    The article reports that India has revealed the national policy for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) for cutting carbon emissions from deforestation. Topics discussed include the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to use carbon sequestration...

  • The Chancellor's axing of support for carbon capture projects has alarmed many.  // Professional Engineering;Dec2015, Vol. 28 Issue 12, p10 

    The article focuses on the decision of Great Britain's government to withdraw funds from the Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) project. Topics discussed include launch of CCS project for storage of carbon emissions in disused North Sea gas fields and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the...

  • Scrapping EU green plans a 'blunder'.  // ENDS (Environmental Data Services);Feb2015, Issue 480, p6 

    The article focuses on the criticisms raised by environmental and industry groups, national governments and members of the European Parliament (MEPs) over the European Commission's (EC) decision in December 2014 to withdraw a draft circular economy package and change an air pollution proposal to...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics