TITLE

Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: oil field or wilderness?

AUTHOR(S)
Spitler, Amanda
PUB. DATE
November 1987
SOURCE
BioScience;Nov87, Vol. 37 Issue 10, p714
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the debate over the prospect of oil and gas drilling on the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge by the U.S. Congress. Consideration of the Congressional hearings held by the House Interior Committee, the House Merchant Marine Committee, and the Senate Energy Committee; Importance of protection wildlife on the coastal plain; Impact of environmental threats and oil production in Alaska.
ACCESSION #
10227509

 

Related Articles

  • Arctic Saved Again.  // Onearth;Fall2004, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p44 

    Reports that the U.S. House of Representatives have dropped a bill allowing oil and gas drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska in June 2004. Attempt made by Republican proponents to pursue the project; Withdrawal of support on the project by the United Mine Workers; Cause of...

  • Counterpoint: Saving the Alaskan Frontier. Witherbee, Amy // Points of View: Arctic Drilling;2017, p6 

    This article presents an argument against drilling in Alaska. The United States has a strong history of working to protect its natural resources. Consisting of an impressive 20 million acres in northern Alaska, the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) was created in 1960 to preserve this...

  • Dry Well for Sanity. Forbes, Steve // Forbes Global;11/24/2003, Vol. 6 Issue 22, p16 

    Comments on conducting oil exploration in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Benefits of conducting the oil exploration; Cause of the environmental problems that occur when conducting oil drillings.

  • Welfare State. Foer, Franklin // New Republic;5/6/2002, Vol. 226 Issue 17, p14 

    Deals with the favorable stand of Alaskans on the proposal to conduct exploratory oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska in May 2002. Examination of the image of Alaska as a self-reliant state; Economic significance of the proposal to the state; Federal budget allotted to...

  • Arctic Oil, Frozen Dialogue.  // Christian Science Monitor;8/30/2000, Vol. 92 Issue 196, p10 

    Presents opinions on the 2000 United States presidential candidates views on oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge of Alaska.

  • Should We Drill in Alaska?  // Junior Scholastic;9/17/2001, Vol. 104 Issue 2, p5 

    Argues the viability of drilling oil and natural gas in Alaska. Percentage of the American citizens opposing to the oil drilling; Views of environmentalists on land and wildlife of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge; Recognition on the need for additional energy sources.

  • WARNINGS OF A WILDLIFE BIOLOGIST. Schoen, John; Lentfer, Hank; Servid, Carolyn // Arctic Refuge;2001, p40 

    This article suggests the conservation of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. More than 250 North American scientists have expressed concerns to U.S. President George W. Bush over the 2001 plan of the government to drill oil at the refuge. Based on their collective experience and...

  • BIRDING IN AN UNTAMED LAND. Sibley, David Allen // National Wildlife (World Edition);Aug/Sep2003, Vol. 41 Issue 5, p34 

    Recounts the 2002 summer experience of a field guide author in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. Description of the activities of birds in the Arctic; Types of bird species found in the area; Major threat of disruption in the refuge. INSET: How Birds Link the Arctic Refuge to Your...

  • Oil debate in Alaska is all in a name. Rosen, Yereth // Christian Science Monitor;6/29/95, Vol. 87 Issue 150, p4 

    Discusses the conflict between oil development and environmental preservation due to the oil drilling project of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) in Alaska. Debate on the subject; Details of the government decision to endorse oil drilling by the ANWR.

Share

Other Topics