TITLE

House and Senate process rival Energy bills

PUB. DATE
May 2003
SOURCE
Power Economics;May2003, Vol. 7 Issue 5, p4
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the processing of rival energy legislative bills by the U.S. House and the U.S. Senate. Aim of reducing the energy dependence of the country; Promotion of energy resources; Controversy over the proposed drilling of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
ACCESSION #
10289013

 

Related Articles

  • SOUND OF A TREE FALLING. Kolbert, Elizabeth // New Yorker;11/18/2002, Vol. 78 Issue 35, p35 

    Criticizes the United States government's environmental policies. Battle between the Congress and the administration over the management of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge; Political factors that influence the policies.

  • Sneak Attack on Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge -- Now Underway in Congress!  // Guardians of the Wild: Wildlife Report;Spring2005, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p3 

    The article presents information on National Wildlife Refuge of Alaska. Big Oil and their lobbyists have failed repeatedly in the last few years to get their Arctic Refuge oil drilling proposals included in various pieces of congressional legislation. The fight for Arctic Refuge drilling could...

  • NORTH to the FUTURE. Dewey, Sarah // Seattle Business;Apr2012, Vol. 23 Issue 4, p34 

    The article discusses how the vast untapped resources in Alaska could benefit the Alaska-related economy of Washington State. It says that tapping these resources would be a difficult task since Washington will need to balance environmental concerns and the development of the Puget Sound region....

  • ALASKA'S Oil War. Ebersole, Rene S. // Current Science;4/6/2001, Vol. 86 Issue 14, p8 

    Solicits views related to oil exploration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. Commitment of oil companies to drill the area without damaging the environment; Support of United States President George Bush for the exploration plans; Disadvantages of advanced oil drilling technology.

  • Should We Drill in Alaska?  // Junior Scholastic;9/17/2001, Vol. 104 Issue 2, p5 

    Argues the viability of drilling oil and natural gas in Alaska. Percentage of the American citizens opposing to the oil drilling; Views of environmentalists on land and wildlife of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge; Recognition on the need for additional energy sources.

  • Arctic Oil, Frozen Dialogue.  // Christian Science Monitor;8/30/2000, Vol. 92 Issue 196, p10 

    Presents opinions on the 2000 United States presidential candidates views on oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge of Alaska.

  • Over a Barrel.  // New Republic;8/20/2001, Vol. 225 Issue 8, p7 

    Reveals that oil exploration in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is not only beneficial for the United States, its environmental impact is also negligible. Call to Democrats for compromise by approving the exploration in exchange for increasing the fuel-economy standards for sport...

  • Energy supply bill clears House panel. Laws, Forrest // Western Farm Press;10/15/2005, Vol. 27 Issue 21, p16 

    Reports on the move of the House Resources Committee to pass legislation that would open a portion of the Arctic National Wildlife refuge to drilling for oil in Alaska. Opposition from environmental organizations; Detail of the area covering the drilling plan; Capability of the project on...

  • Legislative Background.  // Congressional Digest;Jun/Jul2001, Vol. 80 Issue 6/7, p173 

    Reports on legislative bills related to the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. Legislative choices of the 107th Congress; Energy policy of United States President George W. Bush's administration.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of NEW JERSEY STATE LIBRARY

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics