TITLE

Probability Values and Human Values in Evaluating Single-Sex Education

AUTHOR(S)
Liben, Lynn
PUB. DATE
May 2015
SOURCE
Sex Roles;May2015, Vol. 72 Issue 9-10, p401
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Around the globe, educational opportunities and outcomes have long varied in relation to student gender. Within the United States, a particularly intense and growing controversy concerns whether education should be delivered in single-sex contexts. This paper offers a broad framework for approaching this controversy. I review arguments made by historical and contemporary proponents of gender-differentiated education, concluding that these reveal a foundational commitment to gender essentialism (rather than to gender constructivism more commonly embraced by critics of single-sex schooling). I suggest that different gender conceptualizations and different professional traditions affect the kind of data one collects, weighs, and reports. Gender conceptualizations also affect the valence assigned to the amplification or attenuation of gender differences in educational, career, or personal student outcomes. I then propose that other kinds of human values are also relevant to the controversy. Given that in justifying their position, advocates of single-sex public education have recently been focusing less on gendered brain differences and more on the expansion of educational choice, I focus especially on the value of choice. Using arguments paralleling those found in critiques of the U.S. charter-school movement, I suggest that decisions about school choice necessarily entail judgments about a range of goals and human priorities. I close by suggesting that a resolution of the controversy about single-sex education cannot be reached through empirical data alone, but will require discussions of gender conceptualizations, what constitutes evidence, ideal educational outcomes, and broader human values.
ACCESSION #
103365236

 

Related Articles

  • Expanding the Role of Gender Essentialism in the Single-Sex Education Debate: A Commentary on Liben. Fine, C.; Duke, R. // Sex Roles;May2015, Vol. 72 Issue 9-10, p427 

    In this commentary we expand on Liben's exploration of the effects of differing gender conceptualizations - gender essentialism and gender constructivism - on the single-sex education debate within the United States. We examine these conceptualizations in the context of current behavioral and...

  • Thoughts on 'Probability Values and Human Values in Evaluating Single-Sex Education'. Huston, Aletha // Sex Roles;May2015, Vol. 72 Issue 9-10, p446 

    In her commentary on single-sex instruction in the United States, Liben () puts the research on gender-segregated instruction in the context of values and the larger social and political processes affecting decisions about schooling. In this paper, I elaborate on her history of the research and...

  • Challenges in Evaluating Single-Sex Education. Signorella, Margaret // Sex Roles;May2015, Vol. 72 Issue 9-10, p397 

    As a conclusion to the two-part special issue on single-sex education in Sex Roles (Signorella and Bigler 2011, 2013a), this Feminist Forum opens with a concluding commentary by Liben (2015), followed by commentaries on Liben's paper from three different perspectives. Liben provides an...

  • Anecdotal and Essentialist Arguments for Single-Sex Educational Programs Discussed by Liben: a Legal Analysis. Sherwin, Galen // Sex Roles;May2015, Vol. 72 Issue 9-10, p434 

    This commentary responds to Liben's () 'Probability Values and Human Values in Evaluating Single-Sex Education' by analyzing the values she discusses through a legal framework. As Liben correctly points out, many single-sex education programs are animated by claims regarding 'hard wired'...

  • Parents misled by advocates of single-sex education.  // Biomedical Market Newsletter;8/23/2011, Vol. 21, p181 

    The article reports on the study by Lise Eliot published in the online journal "Sex Roles" which shows that single-sex education does not affect the learning of girls and boys.

  • Single-Sex Public Education.  // State Legislatures;Dec2007, Vol. 33 Issue 10, p12 

    This article deals with the re-emergence of the single-sex education trend in the U.S. Some see single-sex education as one solution to closing the achievement gap of minority students. Supporters point to studies that demonstrate learning differences between girls and boys. Opponents call...

  • Why We Must Try Same-Sex Instruction. Laster, Carol // Education Digest;Sep2004, Vol. 70 Issue 1, p59 

    Presents a study on the differences between the achievement of boys and girls when educated in single-sex or coed classes. Description of the all-girls, all-boys, and coed group; Results of the Mississippi Curriculum Test for the single-sex girls, single-sex boys, and coed groups in reading,...

  • SINGLE-GENDER EDUCATION. McTaggart, Jacquie // Briarpatch;Sep/Oct2009, Vol. 38 Issue 5, p16 

    The article discusses the effectiveness of single-gender education in Canada. It is stated that statistics from Canadian Council of Ministers of Education confirmed the influence of gender in academic development. According to the Canadian organization Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat, subject...

  • Problem solving strategies of girls and boys in single-sex mathematics classrooms. Che, Megan; Wiegert, Elaine; Threlkeld, Karen // Educational Studies in Mathematics;Feb2012, Vol. 79 Issue 2, p311 

    This study examines patterns in middle-grade boys' and girls' written problem solving strategies for a mathematical task involving proportional reasoning. The students participating in this study attend a coeducational charter middle school with single-sex classrooms. One hundred nineteen...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics