Anecdotal and Essentialist Arguments for Single-Sex Educational Programs Discussed by Liben: a Legal Analysis

Sherwin, Galen
May 2015
Sex Roles;May2015, Vol. 72 Issue 9-10, p434
Academic Journal
This commentary responds to Liben's () 'Probability Values and Human Values in Evaluating Single-Sex Education' by analyzing the values she discusses through a legal framework. As Liben correctly points out, many single-sex education programs are animated by claims regarding 'hard wired' biological sex difference, and proponents tend to value personal experience and anecdote over scientific approaches to data. This commentary recognizes the contribution Liben makes in situating supporters of single-sex education within a particular historical tradition and illuminating their values. However, it argues that while gender essentialism and resulting claims regarding typical male and female tendencies may be established intellectual philosophies, they are of limited value from a practical legal perspective. Similarly, while anecdotes and personal experience have real power, they are legally insufficient to support sex-based classifications enshrined by public schools. The commentary builds on the link Liben has drawn between historical gender essentialist views surrounding women's education and contemporary proponents of single-sex education by providing examples of how these views are currently being applied in classrooms across the U.S. It then provides a discussion of the development of sex-discrimination law, demonstrating how historical examples of gender essentialism in law were ultimately rejected by the courts. Through a discussion of the legal requirements governing single-sex education, the commentary attempts to illustrate the relevance of both evidence and gender-essentialism in legal determinations about the permissibility of single-sex education programs in the United States.


Related Articles

  • Expanding the Role of Gender Essentialism in the Single-Sex Education Debate: A Commentary on Liben. Fine, C.; Duke, R. // Sex Roles;May2015, Vol. 72 Issue 9-10, p427 

    In this commentary we expand on Liben's exploration of the effects of differing gender conceptualizations - gender essentialism and gender constructivism - on the single-sex education debate within the United States. We examine these conceptualizations in the context of current behavioral and...

  • Thoughts on 'Probability Values and Human Values in Evaluating Single-Sex Education'. Huston, Aletha // Sex Roles;May2015, Vol. 72 Issue 9-10, p446 

    In her commentary on single-sex instruction in the United States, Liben () puts the research on gender-segregated instruction in the context of values and the larger social and political processes affecting decisions about schooling. In this paper, I elaborate on her history of the research and...

  • Challenges in Evaluating Single-Sex Education. Signorella, Margaret // Sex Roles;May2015, Vol. 72 Issue 9-10, p397 

    As a conclusion to the two-part special issue on single-sex education in Sex Roles (Signorella and Bigler 2011, 2013a), this Feminist Forum opens with a concluding commentary by Liben (2015), followed by commentaries on Liben's paper from three different perspectives. Liben provides an...

  • Probability Values and Human Values in Evaluating Single-Sex Education. Liben, Lynn // Sex Roles;May2015, Vol. 72 Issue 9-10, p401 

    Around the globe, educational opportunities and outcomes have long varied in relation to student gender. Within the United States, a particularly intense and growing controversy concerns whether education should be delivered in single-sex contexts. This paper offers a broad framework for...

  • Legal Issues Surrounding Single-Sex Schools in the U.S.: Trends, Court Cases, and Conflicting Laws. Brown, Christia // Sex Roles;Oct2013, Vol. 69 Issue 7-8, p356 

    The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, followed by the 2006 U.S. Department of Education regulations, represented a drastic change in American public policy by allowing for sex segregation in public schools-as long as it is voluntary, students are provided a substantially equal co-educational...

  • The Pros and Cons of Single-Gender Classrooms.  // Curriculum Review;Oct2010, Vol. 50 Issue 2, p9 

    The article discusses a dual academy at the Imagine Southeast Public Charter School in Washington, D.C. where boys and girls are placed in single-gender classrooms. The article describes the structure of the program and provides statistics for single-sex classes in public schools throughout the...

  • Single-Sex Classrooms. HERRON, ARIKA // Education Digest;May2014, Vol. 79 Issue 9, p49 

    A reprint of an article from the December 11, 2013 issue of publication the "Winston-Salem Journal" is presented, which focuses on the use of single-sex classrooms in at Winston-Salem Preparatory Academy in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Topics discussed include the academic motivation that has...

  • Learning Apart.  // Scholastic News -- Edition 4;11/27/2006, Vol. 69 Issue 9, p3 

    The article reports on the announcement of the U.S. Department of Education that public school districts can now create all-boys or all-girls classes and schools. A 1972 law generally prohibits the separation of boys and girls in public schools and classes, except for things like physical...

  • A Meta-Analytic Critique of Mael et al.'s (2005) Review of Single-Sex Schooling. Signorella, Margaret; Hayes, Amy; Li, Yidi // Sex Roles;Oct2013, Vol. 69 Issue 7-8, p423 

    Continued controversy in the United States over the relation of school gender composition to student outcomes is partially due to the failure to reach consensus on how to evaluate the research and the conclusions to be drawn from the research. In this review we examine major problems in the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics