TITLE

Expanding the Role of Gender Essentialism in the Single-Sex Education Debate: A Commentary on Liben

AUTHOR(S)
Fine, C.; Duke, R.
PUB. DATE
May 2015
SOURCE
Sex Roles;May2015, Vol. 72 Issue 9-10, p427
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In this commentary we expand on Liben's exploration of the effects of differing gender conceptualizations - gender essentialism and gender constructivism - on the single-sex education debate within the United States. We examine these conceptualizations in the context of current behavioral and neuroscientific research, which we argue undermines an essentialist view of males and females, while supporting an expanded constructivist version of the account endorsed by Liben. We then extend Liben's work to argue that gender essentialism has indirectly facilitated popularization of neuroscientific research used to support claims of brain-based evidence in favor of single-sex education. Finally, we develop Liben's observations regarding the association of gender essentialism with negative attitudes towards reducing gender-differentiation, by examining the relation between gender essentialism and the folk concept of innateness. This reveals the empirical challenge to essentialist arguments that social interventions designed to reduce gender-differentiation go against nature.
ACCESSION #
103365240

 

Related Articles

  • Anecdotal and Essentialist Arguments for Single-Sex Educational Programs Discussed by Liben: a Legal Analysis. Sherwin, Galen // Sex Roles;May2015, Vol. 72 Issue 9-10, p434 

    This commentary responds to Liben's () 'Probability Values and Human Values in Evaluating Single-Sex Education' by analyzing the values she discusses through a legal framework. As Liben correctly points out, many single-sex education programs are animated by claims regarding 'hard wired'...

  • Thoughts on 'Probability Values and Human Values in Evaluating Single-Sex Education'. Huston, Aletha // Sex Roles;May2015, Vol. 72 Issue 9-10, p446 

    In her commentary on single-sex instruction in the United States, Liben () puts the research on gender-segregated instruction in the context of values and the larger social and political processes affecting decisions about schooling. In this paper, I elaborate on her history of the research and...

  • Challenges in Evaluating Single-Sex Education. Signorella, Margaret // Sex Roles;May2015, Vol. 72 Issue 9-10, p397 

    As a conclusion to the two-part special issue on single-sex education in Sex Roles (Signorella and Bigler 2011, 2013a), this Feminist Forum opens with a concluding commentary by Liben (2015), followed by commentaries on Liben's paper from three different perspectives. Liben provides an...

  • Probability Values and Human Values in Evaluating Single-Sex Education. Liben, Lynn // Sex Roles;May2015, Vol. 72 Issue 9-10, p401 

    Around the globe, educational opportunities and outcomes have long varied in relation to student gender. Within the United States, a particularly intense and growing controversy concerns whether education should be delivered in single-sex contexts. This paper offers a broad framework for...

  • Gender Gap in School Science: Are Single-Sex Schools Important? Sikora, Joanna // Sex Roles;May2014, Vol. 70 Issue 9-10, p400 

    This paper compares science subject choices and science-related career plans of Australian adolescents in single-sex and coeducational schools. Data from the nationally representative Longitudinal Survey of Australian Youth collected from students who were 15 years of age in 2009 show that, in...

  • Boy Brains, Girl Brains. Tyre, Peg // Newsweek (Pacific Edition);9/19/2005 (Pacific Edition), Vol. 146 Issue 12, p52 

    Discusses whether single-sex classrooms are the best way to teach children. Decision of Jeff Gray, principal at an elementary school in Kentucky, to divide his classes by gender; Idea that boys and girls are so biologically different that they need to be separated into single-sex classes and...

  • Boy Brains, Girl Brains. Tyre, Peg // Newsweek (Atlantic Edition);9/19/2005 (Atlantic Edition), Vol. 146 Issue 12, p60 

    Discusses whether single-sex classrooms are the best way to teach children. Decision of Jeff Gray, principal at an elementary school in Kentucky, to divide his classes by gender; Idea that boys and girls are so biologically different that they need to be separated into single-sex classes and...

  • Parents misled by advocates of single-sex education.  // Biomedical Market Newsletter;8/23/2011, Vol. 21, p181 

    The article reports on the study by Lise Eliot published in the online journal "Sex Roles" which shows that single-sex education does not affect the learning of girls and boys.

  • Modalités de prise de décision chez les filles et les garçons en la présence ou en l'absence de l'enseignant. Zghibi, Makram; Sahli, Hajer; Jabri, Mohamed; Ouelhezi, Samira; Guelmemi, Noomen; Wallian, Nathalie // International Review of Education / Internationale Zeitschrift f;Dec2013, Vol. 59 Issue 6, p751 

    How girls and boys take decisions in the presence and absence of a teacher - This work is part of an innovative approach to physical and sports education in Tunisia, and team sports in particular. It uses language studies carried out within the framework of this teaching both to generate a...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics