TITLE

Expanding the Role of Gender Essentialism in the Single-Sex Education Debate: A Commentary on Liben

AUTHOR(S)
Fine, C.; Duke, R.
PUB. DATE
May 2015
SOURCE
Sex Roles;May2015, Vol. 72 Issue 9-10, p427
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In this commentary we expand on Liben's exploration of the effects of differing gender conceptualizations - gender essentialism and gender constructivism - on the single-sex education debate within the United States. We examine these conceptualizations in the context of current behavioral and neuroscientific research, which we argue undermines an essentialist view of males and females, while supporting an expanded constructivist version of the account endorsed by Liben. We then extend Liben's work to argue that gender essentialism has indirectly facilitated popularization of neuroscientific research used to support claims of brain-based evidence in favor of single-sex education. Finally, we develop Liben's observations regarding the association of gender essentialism with negative attitudes towards reducing gender-differentiation, by examining the relation between gender essentialism and the folk concept of innateness. This reveals the empirical challenge to essentialist arguments that social interventions designed to reduce gender-differentiation go against nature.
ACCESSION #
103365240

 

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics