TITLE

THAT WE ARE UNDERLINGS: THE REAL PROBLEMS IN DISCIPLINING POLITICAL SPENDING AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT

AUTHOR(S)
Purdy, Jedediah
PUB. DATE
June 2015
SOURCE
Constitutional Commentary;Summer2015, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p391
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Citizens United v. FEC related to the political spending of corporations in campaign which enables for preventing the political corruption. It mentions that the U.S. First Amendment protections can justify limits on campaign expenditure of the corporations. It also mentions the U.S. Supreme Court case Buckley v. Valeo related to the corporate political spending.
ACCESSION #
108759956

 

Related Articles

  • DIVIDING CITIZENS UNITED: THE CASE V. THE CONTROVERSY. Tribe, Laurence H. // Constitutional Commentary;Summer2015, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p463 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. FEC related to the spending of money by corporations in the elections and use for the prevention of political corruption and its improper influence in the electoral process. It mentions that the decision is based on the First...

  • CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--FIRST AMENDMENT-AGGREGATE LIMITS ON CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS VIOLATE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. GODWIN, ERIN // Cumberland Law Review;2015, Vol. 45 Issue 3, p639 

    The article discusses U.S. Supreme Court cases including McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) and Citizens United v. FEC, focusing on the court's decision on how limits on campaign contributions violate First Amendment rights. Other topics include quid pro quo corruption, how the FEC...

  • Money Managers. Tomasky, Michael // Newsweek Global;2/22/2013, Vol. 161 Issue 8, p1 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, which deals with campaign finance reform in the U.S. Topics include the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the "spending as speech" doctrine from...

  • State Session Freeze Laws--Potential Solution or Unconstitutional Restriction? Swaim, Dru // Seattle University Law Review;2013, Vol. 37 Issue 1, p255 

    The article focuses on the U.S Supreme Court's decision in case Citizens United v. Fed. Election Comm'n that addressed restrictions on U.S federal campaign finance law. Topics discussed include the impact of the lawsuit Citizens United on the restrictions on campaign contributions and...

  • Gift Taxes on Donations to Social Welfare Organizations: De-Politicizing Social Welfare Organizations Or Politicizing the IRS? Melone, Matthew A. // DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal;Fall2013, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p51 

    The article focuses on the politicizing of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regarding the gift taxation on donations to organization having tax-exempt status. Topics discussed include imposition of gift taxes on donations to political organizations, evolution of campaign finance...

  • Transforming Corporate Political Media Spending into Freedom of Speech: A Story of Alchemy and Finesse, 1977-78. Kerr, Robert L. // American Journalism;Winter2011, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p34 

    This article documents the late seventies behind-the-scenes battle led by Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr., that forged a five-justice majority for a narrow Supreme Court holding in First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti to bring corporate political media spending within the protections of the...

  • CITIZENS UNITED AS NEOLIBERAL JURISPRUDENCE: THE RESURGENCE OF ECONOMIC THEORY. Kuhner, Timothy K. // Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law;2011, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p395 

    On January 21, 2010, the Roberts Court freed corporations to spend unlimited general treasury funds on political advertisements, including those that mention candidates by name and those that are run in the weeks before an election. Shown by recent polls to be one of the most unpopular cases in...

  • WHY PERSONHOOD MATTERS. Piety, Tamara R. // Constitutional Commentary;Summer2015, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p361 

    An essay is presented which explores the importance of corporate personhood after the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Citizens United v. FEC on the right of corporation to spend money in political activity. It mentions the personhood metaphor a dismissive reassurance that the...

  • Donor Disclosure: Undermining the First Amendment. Mitchell, Cleta // Minnesota Law Review;2012, Vol. 96 Issue 5, p1755 

    An essay is presented on the legal aspects of American political campaign donations, including an analysis of the protections afforded to citizens under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics