TITLE

DIVIDING CITIZENS UNITED: THE CASE V. THE CONTROVERSY

AUTHOR(S)
Tribe, Laurence H.
PUB. DATE
June 2015
SOURCE
Constitutional Commentary;Summer2015, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p463
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. FEC related to the spending of money by corporations in the elections and use for the prevention of political corruption and its improper influence in the electoral process. It mentions that the decision is based on the First Amendment law which requires the foundational constitutional values democracy, liberty and equality for corporations. It also mentions the campaign finance law of the U.S.
ACCESSION #
108759959

 

Related Articles

  • THAT WE ARE UNDERLINGS: THE REAL PROBLEMS IN DISCIPLINING POLITICAL SPENDING AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT. Purdy, Jedediah // Constitutional Commentary;Summer2015, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p391 

    The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Citizens United v. FEC related to the political spending of corporations in campaign which enables for preventing the political corruption. It mentions that the U.S. First Amendment protections can justify limits on...

  • WHY PERSONHOOD MATTERS. Piety, Tamara R. // Constitutional Commentary;Summer2015, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p361 

    An essay is presented which explores the importance of corporate personhood after the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Citizens United v. FEC on the right of corporation to spend money in political activity. It mentions the personhood metaphor a dismissive reassurance that the...

  • CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--FIRST AMENDMENT-AGGREGATE LIMITS ON CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS VIOLATE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. GODWIN, ERIN // Cumberland Law Review;2015, Vol. 45 Issue 3, p639 

    The article discusses U.S. Supreme Court cases including McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) and Citizens United v. FEC, focusing on the court's decision on how limits on campaign contributions violate First Amendment rights. Other topics include quid pro quo corruption, how the FEC...

  • Donor Disclosure: Undermining the First Amendment. Mitchell, Cleta // Minnesota Law Review;2012, Vol. 96 Issue 5, p1755 

    An essay is presented on the legal aspects of American political campaign donations, including an analysis of the protections afforded to citizens under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election...

  • MONEY UNLIMITED. TOOBIN, JEFFREY // New Yorker;5/21/2012, Vol. 88 Issue 14, p36 

    The article discusses Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court John Roberts' influence over the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case in 2010. It describes how Chief Justice Roberts decided to change the direction of the case in favor of Republican Party beliefs, prohibiting...

  • Election Spending: Reformers On Flood Watch. Jerome, Sara // National Journal;11/7/2009, p2 

    The article focuses on several countermeasures that might be pursued by campaign finance reform advocates in the U.S. if the Supreme Court issues the broadest potential decision in the case Citizens United versus Election Commission. It notes that boosting the influence of small donors is a way...

  • PUBLIC CORRUPTION CONCERNS AND COUNTER-MAJORITARIAN DEMOCRACY DEFINITION IN CITIZENS UNITED V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION. Kimmel, Daaron // Chicago-Kent Law Review;2012, Vol. 87 Issue 1, p265 

    In determining the shape of the free speech rights and anti-corruption concerns that courts must balance in campaign finance cases, judges are influenced by their own underlying understandings of what an ideal democracy should look like. For judges to decide whether the government is...

  • SYMPOSIUM FOREWORD. Fein, Ronald A. // Constitutional Commentary;Summer2015, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p213 

    An introduction is presented in which editor discusses various articles within the issue on topics including the corporate speech under the U.S. First Amendment, role of money in politics and concept of corporate democracy in context of the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. FEC.

  • Former Lobbyist Guts Campaign Finance Reform. CONASON, JOE // Progressive Populist;5/15/2014, Vol. 20 Issue 9, p18 

    The article focuses on the role of Anthony Kennedy, associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, in the political campaign finance reform in the U.S. as of May 2014 as he has dismissed the notion that corruption will arise due to political campaign contributions in the Citizens United court case.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics