Equipped to deal with uncertainty in climate and impacts predictions: lessons from internal peer review

Wesselink, Anna; Challinor, Andrew; Watson, James; Beven, Keith; Allen, Icarus; Hanlon, Helen; Lopez, Ana; Lorenz, Susanne; Otto, Friederike; Morse, Andy; Rye, Cameron; Saux-Picard, Stephane; Stainforth, David; Suckling, Emma
September 2015
Climatic Change;Sep2015, Vol. 132 Issue 1, p1
Academic Journal
The quantification of uncertainty is an increasingly popular topic, with clear importance for climate change policy. However, uncertainty assessments are open to a range of interpretations, each of which may lead to a different policy recommendation. In the EQUIP project researchers from the UK climate modelling, statistical modelling, and impacts communities worked together on 'end-to-end' uncertainty assessments of climate change and its impacts. Here, we use an experiment in peer review amongst project members to assess variation in the assessment of uncertainties between EQUIP researchers. We find overall agreement on key sources of uncertainty but a large variation in the assessment of the methods used for uncertainty assessment. Results show that communication aimed at specialists makes the methods used harder to assess. There is also evidence of individual bias, which is partially attributable to disciplinary backgrounds. However, varying views on the methods used to quantify uncertainty did not preclude consensus on the consequential results produced using those methods. Based on our analysis, we make recommendations for developing and presenting statements on climate and its impacts. These include the use of a common uncertainty reporting format in order to make assumptions clear; presentation of results in terms of processes and trade-offs rather than only numerical ranges; and reporting multiple assessments of uncertainty in order to elucidate a more complete picture of impacts and their uncertainties. This in turn implies research should be done by teams of people with a range of backgrounds and time for interaction and discussion, with fewer but more comprehensive outputs in which the range of opinions is recorded.


Related Articles

  • Climate science: Rising tide. Jones, Nicola // Nature;9/19/2013, Vol. 501 Issue 7467, p301 

    The article discusses various issues associated with global sea-level rise due to climatic changes as of September 19, 2013 by arguing findings of climatic scientists of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). According to the IPCC findings, sea levels will rise by around between...

  • Decadal Climatic Variability, Trends, and Future Scenarios for the North China Plain. Fu, Guobin; Charles, Stephen P.; Yu, Jingjie; Liu, Changming // Journal of Climate;Apr2009, Vol. 22 Issue 8, p2111 

    Observed decadal climatic variability and trends for the north China plain (NCP) are assessed for significance with Kendall's test and discussed in light of future climate scenarios from multi-GCM outputs from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4)....

  • Boost for controversial sea level rise theory. Brahic, Catherine // New Scientist;9/6/2008, Vol. 199 Issue 2672, p12 

    The article presents an analysis concerning the devastating impact of a rising sea-level as forecasted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Anders Carlson of the University of Wisconsin-Madison and colleagues use the IPCC's latest climate models to calculate the temperature...

  • Agreeing to disagree: uncertainty management in assessing climate change, impacts and responses by the IPCC. Swart, Rob; Bernstein, Lenny; Ha-Duong, Minh; Petersen, Arthur // Climatic Change;Jan2009, Vol. 92 Issue 1/2, p1 

    Dealing consistently with risk and uncertainty across the IPCC reports is a difficult challenge. Huge practical difficulties arise from the Panel’s scale and interdisciplinary context, the complexity of the climate change issue and its political context. The key question of this paper is...

  • What will CCS demonstrations demonstrate? Russell, Stewart; Markusson, Nils; Scott, Vivian // Mitigation & Adaptation Strategies for Global Change;Jun2012, Vol. 17 Issue 6, p651 

    The article focuses on the carbon capture and storage (CCS) systems. It says that the CCS demonstration of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 2005 has provided large commercial or demonstration CCS projects in planning or operation. It also mentions that the slow progress of...

  • A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE IPCC.  // Earth Negotiations Bulletin;4/1/2014, Vol. 12 Issue 596, p1 

    The article offers information on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Topics discussed include goals of the three working groups (WG) of IPCC, in which the WG1 addresses the scientific aspects of the climate system and climate change, the comprehensive assessments being...

  • RESUMED IPCC-38 REPORT.  // Earth Negotiations Bulletin;4/1/2014, Vol. 12 Issue 596, p18 

    The article offers information on the 38th session of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) held in Yokohama, Japan from March 25-29, 2014. Topics discussed include the revision of the IPCC-37 report, the acceptance of the contribution of Working Group II (WGII) to IPCC Fifth...

  • A BRIEF ANALYSIS OF THE IPCC MEETINGS.  // Earth Negotiations Bulletin;4/1/2014, Vol. 12 Issue 596, p18 

    The article focuses on the analysis of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) meetings. Topics discussed include the contribution of the Working Group I (WGI) to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), the influence of the WGII assessment report on mitigation, and the importance of the...

  • Innovating the IPCC review process-the potential of young talent. Veer, Lianne; Visser, Hans; Petersen, Arthur; Janssen, Peter // Climatic Change;Jul2014, Vol. 125 Issue 2, p137 

    There is significant potential in young talent for enhancing the credibility of the scientific assessments such as the IPCC's by contributing to quality assurance and quality control. In this essay, we reflect on an experiment that was done by the Dutch government as part of its government...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics