TITLE

Testing Pay for Performance

AUTHOR(S)
Havey, Chris; Limmer, James
PUB. DATE
September 2015
SOURCE
NACD Directorship;Sep/Oct2015, Vol. 41 Issue 5, p72
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the process of testing pay for performance and its importance to ensure the directors of a company of the effectiveness of the compensation programs. Topics covered include the advantages of testing the alignment of pay with performance in benchmarking the executive pay of a company, tips on how to test the alignment and the benefits of the appropriate alignment of pay and performance in developing proxy disclosures.
ACCESSION #
109951978

 

Related Articles

  • Executive Compensation: The Alignment Myth.  // NACD Directorship;Jan/Feb2013, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p70 

    The author discusses pay for performance programs proposed by the shareholders of U.S. company board of directors about effective compensation system for executives in a corporate. The autos are critical of assessments through which the compensations are provided including payment techniques,...

  • CURRENT TRENDS FOR COMPENSATION COMMITTEES. Shaw, David // Directors & Boards;2016 Second Quarter, Vol. 40 Issue 3, p35 

    The article discusses the areas of continuing focus for the board of director's compensation committees which are outlined by Compensation Advisory Partners senior partner Rose Marie Orens. It includes aligning executive pay with performance, chief executive officer (CEO) pay ratios and the...

  • Decoding ISS Evaluations of Pay for Performance. Jaeger, Jaclyn // Compliance Week;Feb2012, Vol. 9 Issue 97, p30 

    The article discusses the evaluations of pay-for-performance disclosures of Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) in the U.S. It mentions the white paper published by ISS which cited its decision to revise the methodology it will use to evaluate executive pay by using a more qualitative...

  • Shareholders & Investors.  // Corporate Board;Sep/Oct2014, Vol. 35 Issue 208, p28 

    The article focuses on an article published in the periodical "ProxyPulse" on the support of the shareholder for executive compensation in 2014. The article reveals a study of 2,788 shareholder meetings held between January 1, 2014 and May 22, 2014 and shows that say-on-pay proposals failed to...

  • The Directors & Boards Survey: CEO and Director compensation 2011. SHAW, DAVID // Directors & Boards;2011 3rd Quarter, Vol. 35 Issue 5, p33 

    The article discusses the "Directors & Boards" Survey on the compensation of executive and director compensation in the U.S. as of 2011. It was found that the total compensation of a chief executive officer (CEO), which includes cash, bonus, and benefits, have increased by 38 percent. The...

  • Cronyism and the Determinants of Chairman Compensation. Oxelheim, Lars; Clarkson, Kevin // Journal of Business Ethics;Sep2015, Vol. 131 Issue 1, p69 

    This study examines determinants of chairman compensation in a supervisory board setting and, specifically, the relationship between chairman and CEO compensation. Using a sample of publicly listed firms in Sweden, the study indicates that chairman compensation-despite its fixed nature-is...

  • COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS.  // Crain's Detroit Business;07/24/2000, Vol. 16 Issue 30, p14 

    Lists the compensation of non-employee directors working for the top 25 public companies in Detroit, Michigan. Names of the company; Retainer cash and stock; Stock grant; Total cash and stock compensation; Stock options.

  • Germany mulls pay publishing. Robinson, Simon // European Chemical News;3/21/2005, Vol. 82 Issue 2139, p8 

    Reports that German Justice Minister Brigitte Zypries has drafted legislation that will require companies listed in the Deutsche Aktienindex (DAX) 30 index of Germany's biggest public companies to publish salaries of individual board members. Provision of the legislation; Information on DAX...

  • Measured success? Pachetti, Nick // Money;May2002, Vol. 31 Issue 5, p22 

    Discusses two studies released in March 2002 which show the first decrease in executive pay in a decade. Conclusions of Pearl Meyer & Partners as well as the 'Wall Street Journal' and consulting firm William Mercer; View that both studies seem to suggest the idea of pay for performance is...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of NEW JERSEY STATE LIBRARY

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics