David Albright's response

March 1985
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Mar1985, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p63
Presents a letter regarding the U.S.-Euratom treaty on the use of plutonium in nuclear weapons.


Related Articles

  • No farewell to arms?  // Nature;9/23/2004, Vol. 431 Issue 7007, p385 

    Discusses nuclear weapons program of North Korea. Experiments conducted by South Korean scientists on enriching uranium and on extracting plutonium from nuclear waste; Attempts of North Korea to resume talks over its weapons plans; Japan's development of a massive reprocessing plant for spent...

  • And the March Goes On. Mangan, Dennis // Journal of the Institute of Nuclear Materials Management;Spring2010, Vol. 38 Issue 3, p3 

    An introduction to the journal is presented in which the editor discusses safe storage of plutonium, "International Safeguards in Nuclear Weapons States and a Look at the Future" and carbon emission problems.

  • How much plutonium does North Korea have? Albright, David // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Sep/Oct1994, Vol. 50 Issue 5, p46 

    Looks at data concerning North Korea's plutonium possession. Success of the country's nuclear weapons program; Inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); Description of North Korea's reprocessing facility.

  • Plutonium, politics, and panic. Hibbs, Mark // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Nov/Dec1994, Vol. 50 Issue 6, p24 

    Investigates the smuggling of plutonium from the former Soviet Union to Germany. Iranian agents' presence in Germany; Nuclear weapons as sources of plutonium; Denial of existence of black market for nuclear goods; Technical analyses of seized materials. INSETS: Plutonium fingerprints.;`Agent...

  • Playing with fire Lyman, Francesca // Environmental Action;Sep/Oct1983, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p10 

    No abstract available.

  • It's a Bird . . . It's Plutonium. Campbell, Douglas // Progressive;May88, Vol. 52 Issue 5, p7 

    Comments on Robin Epstein's article in the February issue of 'The Progressive' magazine, which focused on misplaced plutonium and nuclear weapons.

  • Redundant warheads could fuel Russian reactors. Edwards, Rob // New Scientist;2/25/95, Vol. 145 Issue 1966, p5 

    Reports on a German study suggesting the use of plutonium from Russia's nuclear warheads as fuel for power stations. Comments of Evgeny Kudriavtsev; Greenpeace argument that plutonium in MOX fuel can easily be made into nuclear weapons.

  • Plan to use military plutonium at civilian plants stirs debate. Grier, Peter; Spotts, Peter N. // Christian Science Monitor;12/10/96, Vol. 89 Issue 11, p1 

    Reports that Washington is proposing to destroy much of the United States' plutonium stockpile in a process that could be almost as complex and controversial as the material's production. Impact of the end of the cold war on nuclear weapons and plutonium pits; Estimated tons of plutonium in the...

  • Tito's Nuclear Legacy. Potter, William C.; Miljanic, Djuro; Slaus, Ivo // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Mar/Apr2000, Vol. 56 Issue 2, p63 

    Speculates on the nuclear capabilities of Yugoslavia. Information on the nuclear weapons program of Yugoslavia; Amount of weapons-grade uranium fuel in Serbia; Collaboration between Norway and Yugoslavia on plutonium processing.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics