EQUITY IN SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, OR USING ARTICLE 78 JUDICIAL REVIEW TO ACHIEVE JUSTICE FOR PUBLIC HOUSING OCCUPANTS
Related Articles
- No new trial for man convicted of mother-daughter executions. // Buffalo Law Journal;11/8/2007, Vol. 79 Issue 90, p14
The article reports that the New York Supreme Court's Appellate Division has denied giving a convicted man a new trial. Robert Williams Jr., in his appeal to the appellate court, claimed that his conviction in February 2005 was not supported by legally sufficient evidence. The appellate court...
- I'LL TAKE "IMPROPER DECLARATIONS OF MISTRIAL" FOR $2,000.00: APPLYING THE PROTECTION AGAINST DOUBLE JEOPARDY. Fier, Daniel // Touro Law Review;2012, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p893
The article offers information on the judicial decision of the Third Judicial Department of the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court in the case of Robar v. LaBuda, in which the Court granted petitioner's motion to stay retrial after citing relevant statutory and case law evidence...
- SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT. Loney, Kashima A. // Touro Law Review;2011, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p901
The article discusses the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, Fourth Department case People v. Gibson, in which the defendant Jeffrey D. Gibson was convicted of robbery based on DNA acquired evidence. It discusses the allegations made by Gibson on the basis of a police officer's effort to...
- WHEN DOES FORCE BECOME EXCESSIVE? Prusinski, Taryn // Touro Law Review;2015, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p851
The article discusses the Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department's ruling in the 2014 case People v. Atkinson which deals with the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and claims of excessive force by police officers. Deprivations of American constitutional rights...
- SOMEONE CALL 911, CRAWFORD IS DYING. Knoepffler, Caroline // Touro Law Review;2012, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p979
The article offers information on the judicial decision of the New York Court of Appeals in the case of People v. Duhs, in which the Court rejected the plaintiff's argument for testifying about a statement of witness under the hearsay rule. It informs that defendant Michael Duhs claimed that the...
- CONFRONTING THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE: ADDRESSING THE UNANSWERED QUESTION OF WHETHER AUTOPSY REPORTS ARE TESTIMONIAL EVIDENCE. Ince, Bailey // Touro Law Review;2012, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p993
The article offers information on the judicial decision of the First Department of the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court in the case of People v. Hall, in which the Court examines the nature of the autopsy report and its admissibility as the testimonial evidence in the jury's...
- FLYING SOLO WITHOUT A LICENSE: THE RIGHT OF PRO SE DEFENDANTS TO CRASH AND BURN. Frigenti, Tiffany // Touro Law Review;2012, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p1019
The article offers information on the judicial decision of the Second Department of the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court in the case of People v. Smith, in which the Court addressed the pro se defendant's right of self-representation under the Sixth Amendment. It mentions that...
- DO AUTOMOBILE PASSENGERS HAVE A LEGITIMATE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY? AN ANALYSIS OF REASONABLE EXPECTATION UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT. Belrose, Lisa // Touro Law Review;2012, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p771
The article offers information on the judicial decision of the Second Department of the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court in the case People v. Howard, in which the Court denied the defendant Dustin Howard's motion to suppress the evidence in context to violation of privacy under...
- Auctioneer Consignors' Names May Not Be Private. Hausler, Sanford // Appellate Practice Journal;Fall2012, Vol. 32 Issue 1, p29
The article informs that the New York Appellate Division has dismissed the act of fraud committed by clerk working at an auction house following a sale of notation through bidding.
