TITLE

CREDITABLE MARRIAGE GOALS AND GOVERNMENT INTERESTS: A SYSTEMS APPROACH FOR HANDLING COMPLEXITY, APPORTIONING EXPERTISE, AND USING FEDERALISM (ANTICIPATING OBERGEFELL)

AUTHOR(S)
KUYKENDALL, MAE
PUB. DATE
July 2015
SOURCE
Journal of Research in Gender Studies;2015, Vol. 5 Issue 2, p323
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article argues that the Supreme Court should require that all states recognize legal same-sex marriages rather than mandate under the Fourteenth Amendment that states must issue marriage licenses to couples of the same sex. The briefing that advocates, including most amici, provided to the Supreme Court was generally abstract. The Court did not benefit from a combined answer to the two questions. It therefore did not hear a useful comparison of why a Yes to recognition, with a No to mandating authorization, might be a superior approach. If the Court were to require only recognition, it could avoid constitutionalizing marriage law; it need not decide the recognition issue under the Fourteenth Amendment, despite its having certified the question under the Fourteenth Amendment. Rather, principles of comity draw upon the Court's expertise in federalism and do not call for a direct intervention in state law-making about marriage. Such an approach could incentivize some states to offer their marriage licensing, and even their substantive law, to couples who do not travel to the state. Gay rights activists could help improve and modernize marriage licensing procedure by encouraging states to provide for the issuance of licenses to couples unable to travel or to be present together. They could also bring energy in the state legislatures and before state courts to the substantive evolution of marriage law that is less defined today by beliefs about gender complementarity but not entirely severed from the element of gender in the moral architecture of many marriages. The relevance to marriage law of gender difference in a regime of marriage law that includes same-sex couples does not by any means pose a threat to the institution of marriage. But abstract arguments about the essence of marriage fail to bring the Court's attention to a constitutional path permitting wide input into decision-making, with the benefit of comity among the states as a means of ensuring respect for all marriages and families. A shortsighted judicial shortcut to solve a complex issue by resort to grand abstraction may seem to cure an injustice, but at the same time loosen the rooting of a critical institution in the nourishment of immersion by policy-makers in its practical requirements.
ACCESSION #
111971869

 

Related Articles

  • Federal Court Rules Oklahoma Constitution's Same-Sex Marriage Ban Violates Equal Protection; Appeal of Stayed Ruling to be argued in 10th Circuit on April 17.  // Lesbian -- Gay Law Notes;Feb2014, p53 

    The article discusses the U.S. Federal Court case Bishop v. United States, wherein Senior U.S. District Judge Terence C. Kern stayed his ruling on January 14, 2014, declaring that Oklahoma's constitutional amendment that bans same-sex marriages fails to satisfy the deferential rationality review...

  • WHEN ROMER MET FEENEY: WHY THE SECOND SENTENCE OF THE OHIO MARRIAGE AMENDMENT VIOLATES EQUAL PROTECTION. YASINOW, MELISSA A. // Case Western Reserve Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 61 Issue 4, p1315 

    The article focuses on the second sentence of the Ohio Marriage Amendment which allegedly violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. It is inferred that the second sentence of the amendment is a form of discrimination targeting gays and lesbians. It...

  • Ruling Allows Same-Sex Marriages For Florida Keys. ANDERSON, CURT // Between the Lines (10807551);7/24/2014, Vol. 2230, p13 

    The article reports on a ruling by Circuit Judge Luis M. Garcia in Florida Keys which overturns the constitutional ban on same-sex marriage in Monroe County, Michigan and mentions that gay couples filed the lawsuit claiming that the constitutional ban made them second-class citizens. Topics...

  • FEDERAL COURT DECLARES CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 8 UNCONSTITUTIONAL; DECISION STAYED BY 9TH CIRCUIT PENDING APPEAL. A. S. L. // Lesbian -- Gay Law Notes;Sep2010, p127 

    The article discusses a court case wherein U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker ruled that Proposition 8, the 2008 California ballot measure providing that only the union of one man and one woman would be valid as a marriage in the state, violates the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment. In Perry...

  • THE PATERNITY ESTABLISHMENT THEORY OF MARRIAGE AND ITS RAMIFICATIONS FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS. Raley, Gage // Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law;2011, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p133 

    Proponents of gay marriage have long argued that laws banning the practice violate the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the United States Constitution and their counterparts in state constitutions. They contend that same-sex couples have the same fundamental right to marry as...

  • NOTE. Rouse, Nathan // Seattle University Law Review;Winter2013, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p1243 

    The article discusses the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals case Perry v. Brown wherein decision was made by the court that state constitutional amendment of California eliminates rights of same-sex couples to marry. initiative constitutional amendments unconstitutional. The Court of Appeals...

  • Point: The Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage is a Victory for the Civil Liberties of Gay and Lesbian Persons.  // Points of View: Same Sex Marriage;1/1/2017, p4 

    The article explains the significance of same-sex marriage legalization towards the human rights of homosexuals. Topics discussed include support for equal protection of homosexuals under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the role of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v....

  • MARRIAGE EQUALITY STATE BY STATE.  // Echo Magazine;7/3/2014, Vol. 25 Issue 21, p18 

    The article reports on marriage equality in various states in the U.S. from 2004 to 2014. These include Massachusetts, New York and California. It also notes the initiation of the marriage on November 12, 2008 in Connecticut after its Supreme Court declared the unconstitutionality of its law on...

  • PUBLICATIONS NOTED & ANNOUNCEMENTS.  // Lesbian -- Gay Law Notes;Oct2011, p220 

    No abstract available.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics