TITLE

Recovering the Freedom of Speech

AUTHOR(S)
Haun, William J.
PUB. DATE
January 2016
SOURCE
National Affairs;Winter2016, Vol. 26, p82
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article focuses on the Freedom of Speech Clause in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Topics covered include the failure of conservatives to recover the founders' notion of protected speech in the Free Speech Clause, the dominant jurisprudence on the Supreme Court with regards to the clause, and the attempt by some modern scholars, including Alexander Meiklejohn and Judge Robert Bork, to approach the First Amendment from a perspective consistent with that of the framers.
ACCESSION #
112067258

 

Related Articles

  • The Free Speech Jurisprudence of the Rehnquist Court.  // Free Speech Yearbook;1991, Vol. 29, p83 

    An essay is presented on free speech jurisprudence under the leadership of U.S. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist during his 1988-1989 and 1989-1990 U.S. Supreme Court terms. The author states that those observers who criticized Rehnquist Court's jurisprudence for cutting back on individual...

  • IMAGINARY THREATS TO GOVERNMENT'S EXPRESSIVE INTERESTS. Norton, Helen // Case Western Reserve Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 61 Issue 4, p1265 

    The article discusses the exemption of the government's own speech from the free speech clause scrutiny of the U.S. Supreme Court. It highlights the importance of government expression which enables members of the public to identify the priorities of the government. It emphasizes the court case...

  • To DEFER OR NOT TO DEFER? DEFERENCE AND ITS DIFFERENTIAL IMPACT ON FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS IN THE ROBERTS COURT. Calvert, Clay; Hayes, Justin B. // Case Western Reserve Law Review;Fall2012, Vol. 63 Issue 1, p13 

    The article presents information on the concept of deference in context with the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution which protects the rights of individuals to freedom of speech under the Roberts Court which refers to the U.S. Supreme Court. It also mentions about disagreements among the...

  • THE FIRST AMENDMENT'S EPISTEMOLOGICAL PROBLEM. Horwitz, Paul // Washington Law Review;Jun2012, Vol. 87 Issue 2, p445 

    The article discusses U.S. Constitution First Amendment jurisprudence as of June 2012, focusing on several trends involving First Amendment protections including the U.S. Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in the United States v. Alvarez Stolen Valor Act case, as well as questions about...

  • David Riesinan and First Amendment Jurisprudence: From the "Power of the State" to "Protection of Autonomy,' to "Intent to Intimidate " Hickey, Jeremiah // Free Speech Yearbook;2006-2009, Vol. 43, p35 

    The article discusses the article "New Critics of the Court," by David Riesman, who examined the issues of democracy and civil liberties in the U.S. Supreme Court decisions of cases, Sweezy v. New Hampshire, Watkins v. United States and Yates v. United States. It discusses the changes in the...

  • Content and Viewpoint Neutrality: How Fundamental Tenets of First Amendment Law Have Come to be Plagued by Inconsistency and Confusion. Kozlowski, Dan V. // Free Speech Yearbook;2006-2009, Vol. 43, p50 

    The article discusses the criticality of the content- and viewpoint-based speech regulations under the U.S. First Amendment jurisprudence. It states that the Supreme Court has not defined a viewpoint discrimination in cases judged by Justice Warren Burger. According to justice Lewis Powell, the...

  • Derridean Diagnosis of Marketplace Ills: Curing Schizophrenia and Amnesia in the First Amendment Search for Truth. Whittaker, Chris // Brigham Young University Law Review;2011, Vol. 2011 Issue 4, p1293 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation of freedom of speech jurisprudence. Information is provided on how the court defines the First Amendment rights of individuals by balancing the individual rights with offensiveness of speech. It is noted that courts often allow...

  • UNDERSTANDING POST'S AND MEIKLEJOHN'S MISTAKES: THE CENTRAL ROLE OF ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY IN THE THEORY OF FREE EXPRESSION. Redish, Martin H.; Mollen, Abby Marie // Northwestern University Law Review;Summer2009, Vol. 103 Issue 3, p1303 

    The article discusses the democratic theories on the First Amendment of Alexander Meiklejohn and Robert Post. It cites the two principles that any democratic theory should have namely the principle of self-rule and autonomy of public opinion from government. It concludes that Mieklejohn and...

  • Shielding Anonymous Speakers on US News Websites. Fargo, Anthony L // Journal of Media Law;Jul2011, Vol. 3 Issue 1, p49 

    The article focuses on several methods that newspaper used under the state shield laws for protecting the identities of anonymous commentators in the U.S. It mentions that the Supreme Court of the U.S. has not interpreted the press clause of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment, that protects...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics