TITLE

REFLECTIONS ON CAMPAIGN FINANCE AND THE 2012 ELECTION

AUTHOR(S)
WEINTRAUB, ELLEN L.; TAUSANOVITCH, ALEX
PUB. DATE
July 2013
SOURCE
Willamette Law Review;2013, Vol. 49 Issue 4, p541
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article examines the changes in elections laws developed during 2012 U.S. presidential elections. Topics discussed include formation of Super political action committees (PAC) that are able to raise unlimited amounts of money for political campaigns; the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case "Citizens United v. FEC;" challenges to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) due to the changes; and laws to limit the campaign funds.
ACCESSION #
112173979

 

Related Articles

  • THE MYTHOLOGY OF SUPER PACS: MUCH ADO ABOUT (ALMOST) NOTHING. KELNER, ROBERT // Willamette Law Review;2013, Vol. 49 Issue 4, p671 

    A speech delivered by Robert Kelner, Partner of law firm Covington & Burling LLP at the Willamette University College of Law Symposium on Campaign Finance and the 2012 Election on February 8, 2013, is presented. Topics discussed include use of Super political action committee (PAC) in raising...

  • SUPER PACS AND THE ROLE OF "COORDINATION" IN CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAW. SMITH, BRADLEY A. // Willamette Law Review;2013, Vol. 49 Issue 4, p603 

    The article offers information related to Super political action committees (PAC) that are able to raise unlimited amounts of money from individuals, corporations, unions, and other organizations for political campaigns. Topics discussed include the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case...

  • Election 2010: The Loophole Created by 11 C.F.R. § 104.20(c) (9) and Citizens United and the Ineffectiveness of the Campaign-Finance-Law Framework in Iowa. Flaherty, Brian P. // Iowa Law Review;Nov2011, Vol. 97 Issue 1, p239 

    The loophole in the campaign-finance-law framework created by the combination of II C.F.R. § 104.20(c)(9) and Citizens United v. FEC allowed nonprofit organizations to use unlimited and anonymous donations from corporations to fund political communications during the 2010 election campaign....

  • Campaign Disclosure in Direct Democracy. Kang, Michael // Minnesota Law Review;2013, Vol. 97 Issue 5, p1700 

    No abstract available.

  • CITIZENS UNITED AND THE ROBERTS COURT'S WAR ON DEMOCRACY. Nichol, Gene // Georgia State University Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p1007 

    The author offers his insight on the decision of Roberts Court on the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) in the context of democracy in the U.S. He notes that Citizens United considers campaign finance limitations ridiculous. He considers the campaign finance rulings of...

  • BACK TO THE 'BAGMAN' Alter, Jonathan // Newsweek;11/8/2010, Vol. 156 Issue 19, p45 

    The article discusses the secretive funding of U.S. election campaigns by private individuals and corporations. The article argues that the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission allows private individuals and companies to secretly fund campaigns and...

  • CITIZENS UNITED AND THE ORPHANED ANTIDISTORTION RATIONALE. Hasen, Richard L. // Georgia State University Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p989 

    An essay is presented on the rationale of orphaned antidistortion in the court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) in the U.S. It discusses how the argument concerning antidistortion became an orphan in Citizens United blaming the dissent of Supreme Court Justice John Paul...

  • BACK TO THE 'BAGMAN' Alter, Jonathan // Newsweek;11/8/2010, Vol. 156 Issue 19, p45 

    The article discusses the secretive funding of U.S. election campaigns by private individuals and corporations. The article argues that the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission allows private individuals and companies to secretly fund campaigns and...

  • Super PACs. Briffault, Richard // Minnesota Law Review;2012, Vol. 96 Issue 5, p1644 

    The article discusses U.S. campaign finance reform and super political action committees (Super PACs) in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the 2010 case Citizens United v. Federal Election Committee (FEC). Independent financing for political campaigns and advertisements is...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics