When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods

Saaty, Thomas L.; Ergu, Daji
November 2015
International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Makin;Nov2015, Vol. 14 Issue 6, p1171
Academic Journal
Decision makers often face complicated decision problems with intangible and conflicting criteria. Numerous multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods have been proposed to handle the measurement of the priorities of conflicting tangible/intangible criteria and in turn use them to choose the best alternative for a decision. However, the presence of many MCDM methods bewilders users. The existence of these methods becomes a decision problem in itself, and decision makers may be uncertain about which one to use. Thus the comparative analysis and evaluation of various MCDM methods has come under scrutiny by both researchers and practitioners in order to discover if there are logical, mathematical, social or practical reasons why one method is better than another. Criteria for their evaluation are the first important issue that needs to be resolved. In this paper, 16 criteria are introduced that may be used to judge and evaluate various MCDM methods. The criteria proposed and some guidelines for their evaluation are given to help readers evaluate these MCDM methods.


Related Articles

  • USING AHP METHOD AT THE DETERMINATION OF THE OPTIMAL SELECTION CRITERIA OF CONVEYOR BELTS. ANDREJIOVÁ, Miriam; KIMÁKOVÁ, Zuzana; MARÁSOVÁ, Daniela // Annals of the Faculty of Engineering Hunedoara - International J;2013, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p155 

    Multicriteria decision-making methods play nowadays an increasingly important role in many decision-making situations. Such a decision could be e.g. the selection of a supplier, the selection of an employer, the choice of a car brand, or a home computer. Apart from common decisions there are...

  • Group Aggregation Techniques for Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: A Comparative Analysis. Ossadnik, Wolfgang; Schinke, Stefanie; Kaspar, Ralf // Group Decision & Negotiation;Mar2016, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p421 

    The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the analytic network process are important multiple criteria decision making methods for supporting complex, discrete strategic management decision problems. In order to exploit a broader information basis as well as to achieve a sufficient degree of...

  • Entropy-KEMIRA Approach for MCDM Problem Solution in Human Resources Selection Task. Krylovas, Aleksandras; Kosareva, Natalja; Dadelo, Stanislavas; Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras // International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Makin;Sep2017, Vol. 16 Issue 5, p1183 

    Entropy-KEMIRA approach is proposed for criteria ranking and weights determining when solving Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) problem in human resources selection task. For the first time the method is applied in the case of three groups of criteria. Weights are calculated by solving...

  • ARACE - A New Method for Verbal Decision Analysis. Oleynikov, Denis P.; Butenko, Lyudmila N.; Moshkovich, Helen M.; Mechitov, Alexander I. // International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Makin;Jan2015, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p115 

    ARACE is a new method developed within the framework of Verbal Decision Analysis (VDA). VDA methods work with verbal form of preference elicitation and evaluation of alternatives without resorting to numbers. ARACE is based on the ideas of the VDA method ZAPROS but uses a more flexible approach...


    This paper provides a brief overview of relevant ideas for public e-procurement which represent an important service of the entire concept of electronic government. The concept of public e-procurement is explained as an element of the decision making phenomenon. Basic modules of the system of...

  • Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy GTMA for Location Selection of Gas Pressure Reducing Stations: A Case Study. Chaghooshi, Ahmad Jafarnejad; Safari, Hossein; Reza Fathi, Mohammad // Journal of Management Research;Jul2012, Vol. 4 Issue 3, p152 

    Location selection is a multi-criteria decision problem and has a strategic importance for many companies. In this study, an integrated approach which employs Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy GTMA is proposed for location selection of Gas pressure reducing stations. The Fuzzy AHP is usedto analyze the...

  • Prequalification of Construction Contractor using a FAHP. Trivedi, M. K.; Pandey, M. K.; Bhadoria, S. S. // International Journal of Computer Applications;Aug2011, Vol. 28, p39 

    Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) as multiple criteria decision making tools can be used in the problems with spatial nature like selection of construction contractor. In this study the application of AHP and its weakness and strength and ultimately the fuzzy modified analytical hierarchy...

  • An Integrated VIKOR and Fuzzy AHP Method for Assessing a Sustainable Research Project. Thipparat, Thoedtida; Thaseepetch, Thongpoon // World Applied Sciences Journal;2013, Vol. 22 Issue 12, p1729 

    The main aim of this paper is to present an alternative of assigning weights to decision criteria in Multi Criteria Decision Making problems. The fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) is applied for this objective. The sustainable research process is necessary for a university....

  • Identification of a Multicriteria Decision-Making Model Using the Characteristic Objects Method. Piegat, Andrzej; Sałabun, Wojciech // Applied Computational Intelligence & Soft Computing;2014, p1 

    This paper presents a new, nonlinear, multicriteria, decision-making method: the characteristic objects (COMET). This approach, which can be characterized as a fuzzy reference model, determines a measurement standard for decision-making problems. This model is distinguished by a constant set of...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics