TITLE

A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE PREMISES UNDERLYING KOREA'S NUCLEAR ENERGY POLICY

AUTHOR(S)
Kyungjun Yun
PUB. DATE
December 2015
SOURCE
Energy & Environment;Dec2015, Vol. 26 Issue 8, p1335
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Since the 1970s, Korea, the world's 5th largest producer of nuclear electricity, has consistently made efforts to expand its nuclear power capacities to meet the nation's electricity demands. This study critically examines four premises underlying Korea's nuclear energy policy, and argues that these premises are not sufficiently concrete to guide Korea's national energy policy. First, the hidden and social costs of nuclear energy, combined with the rapid growth and development of renewable energy technologies, will undermine the economic competitiveness of nuclear energy in the near future; at that point, nuclear reactors, especially recently constructed ones, could become dangerous and expensive legacies of an obsolete technology. Second, the possibility that nuclear energy can mitigate climate change has been exaggerated. The maintenance of over 430 nuclear plants to offset 4% of contribution of world greenhouse gases (GHGs) is disputable, considering the availability of more promising and safer alternatives for addressing climate change issues. Third, electricity consumption per capita in Korea is excessive and inefficient as compared with consumption levels in most major economies, a phenomenon which is closely related to the electricity price in Korea, which is one of the cheapest in the world. Planning for nuclear expansion without consideration of this demand-side problem, which includes the price point, is hardly helpful for responding to energy security or climate change issues. Lastly, considering that the global contribution of nuclear energy to electricity production is decreasing, and that nuclear energy may be edged out by renewables in the long term, a nuclear renaissance may never materialize. Korea will not be able to export 80 reactors by the year 2030, even though a few countries will be constructing nuclear reactors for some time to come. Naturally, the nuclear industry is not sufficiently promising for Korea to adopt to fuel economic growth. The message raised by all of the above points is clear: new reactor construction is not desirable in Korea, and the older reactors already in operation need to be gradually decommissioned and replaced with more promising alternatives, including demand-side controls (e.g., energy price adjustments and energy conservation), alternative fuel mix, and the expansion of renewable energy use.
ACCESSION #
112510322

 

Related Articles

  • A nuclear falling out. Tunnicliffe, Helen // TCE: The Chemical Engineer;Aug2011, Issue 842, p22 

    The article presents contradictory opinions on whether Germany can run its economic in a post-nuclear age. According to geologist and earth scientist Jeremy Leggett, Germany made the right decision in shutting down its nuclear reactors and investing into renewables instead. He believes that the...

  • The big divide: is idealogy holding back greens from embracing nuclear power? Lee, Matilda // Ecologist;Aug2011, Vol. 40 Issue 26, p17 

    The article discusses the opinion of environmental activists on nuclear power, noting that the movement in Great Britain has become split between traditional anti-nuclear campaigners and those who claim that nuclear energy is an important part of climate change mitigation. Pro-nuclear...

  • Europe Still Big on Nuclear Power. Jonas, Andrzej; Ratajczyk, Andrzej // Warsaw Voice;Dec2012, Issue 12, p36 

    An interview with Poland's Commissioner for Nuclear Energy Hanna Trojanowska is presented. When asked about the tenets that govern the building and construction of nuclear power plants in the country, Trojanowska cites the 2009 government resolutions that allows the construction of 6,000...

  • Nuclear map.  // New Scientist;5/26/2007, Vol. 194 Issue 2605, p6 

    The article discusses the creation of several nuclear power plants throughout the United States and Great Britain. Great Britain's main concern is with the location of these reactors in regards to the information the country now has on global warming. Power plants that were originally planned...

  • White Knights: will wind and solar come to the rescue of a looming capacity gap from nuclear phase-out or slow CCS start-up? Griffin, Bradford; Buisson, Pierre; Criqui, Patrick; Mima, Silvana // Climatic Change;Apr2014, Vol. 123 Issue 3/4, p623 

    In the wake of the Fukushima nuclear accident, countries like Germany and Japan have planned a phase-out of nuclear generation. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology has yet to become a commercially viable technology with little prospect of doing so without strong climate policy to spur...

  • Nuclear Waste Management and New Build. Tromans, Stephen // Environmental Law Review;2009, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p233 

    In this article, the author discusses the construction of nuclear power stations in Great Britain. He remarks that the interest of Great Britain for the commissioning of nuclear power stations rooted from the concerns of the Government regarding the impacts of man-made global warming and the...

  • Battling for acceptance.  // Finweek;11/1/2007 Supplement, p24 

    Information about the green status of nuclear energy discussed at the Alternative Energy Forum held in Keystone, Colorado is presented. The possible risks brought by nuclear energy has still caused discomfort to the officials. The forum was attended by several officials including Eric...

  • Banging the drum for nuclear power. Milne, Roger // Utility Week;5/13/2005, Vol. 23 Issue 16, p13 

    Focuses on issues arising the nuclear reactor programme of the British government. Factors that could contribute to the achievement of the benefits of renewable energy sources according to former Department of Energy minister Brian Wilson; Stand of Chancellor Gordon Brown and environment...

  • A Nuclear Future? Sarvate, Sarita // India Currents;Apr2011, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p64 

    In this article the author discusses aspects of the proliferation of nuclear technology in the U.S. despite the risks of accidents leading to long term environmental and health damages. She is critical of the safety offered by backup systems to nuclear reactors and their capacity to withstand...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics