TITLE

Sequential Hybrid CryoMaze Ablation versus Surgical CryoMaze Alone for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (SurHyb): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

AUTHOR(S)
Eisenberger, Martin; Bulava, Alan; Kautzner, Josef; Neuzil, Petr; Mokracek, Ales; Hanis, Jiri; Dusek, Ladislav
PUB. DATE
October 2016
SOURCE
Trials;10/24/2016, Vol. 17, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Atrial fibrillation is common in patients with structural heart disease who are undergoing cardiac surgery. Surgical CryoMaze has been shown to be an effective treatment in several trials, but success rates have varied considerably, between 47-95 %. The sequential hybrid approach, combining surgical CryoMaze followed by radiofrequency catheter ablation, can achieve high freedom from atrial arrhythmias, even when rigorous methods to detect arrhythmias after the procedure are used. However, data from randomized trials comparing hybrid ablations to surgical ablations alone are lacking. Methods/Design: The SurHyb study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized study. Patients with persistent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation will be randomized to either surgical CryoMaze alone or surgical CryoMaze followed by catheter ablation 3 months post-surgery. The primary outcome measure is arrhythmia-free survival without class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs, which will be evaluated using 7-day ECG Holter monitoring at 24 months. A total of 260 patients will be investigated from three medical centers in the Czech Republic to obtain the relevant information. Discussion: This is the first randomized study that compares surgical CryoMaze alone with the staged hybrid surgical CryoMaze followed by catheter ablation in patients with persistent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. These results will contribute to the optimization of the treatment for these patients.
ACCESSION #
119089025

 

Related Articles

  • In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation complex ablation techniques were no better than pulmonary vein isolation alone in preventing recurrent atrial fibrillation. Manninger, Martin; Scherr, Daniel // Evidence Based Medicine;Oct2015, Vol. 20 Issue 5, p175 

    The article discusses the efficacy of catheter ablation techniques and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in preventing recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF). It references the study "Approaches to Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation" by A. Verma et al., published in the "New England...

  • Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the need for studies to assess the efficacy and safety of novel anticoagulants. Naccarelli, Gerald; Gonzalez, Mario // Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology;Jan2013, Vol. 36 Issue 1, p3 

    The authors suggest the need for studies to assess the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation in treating patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). They note a 70% success rate of the procedure in selected patients, while others are at increased risk of thromboembolic events during and following...

  • Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Zarifyan, Alla; Nattel, Stanley; Verma, Atul; Berenfeld, Omer; Ha├»ssaguerre, Michel // MD Conference Express;Jun2015, Vol. 15 Issue 12, p22 

    Atrial fibrillation can become self-sustaining due to structural remodeling that results in changes in ion currents over time. Treatment of atrial fibrillation with ablation does not appear to be improved by additional substrate ablation (CFE or Lines) when performed in addition to PVI. There is...

  • Caution over use of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Van Brabandt, Hans; Neyt, Mattias; Devos, Carl // BMJ: British Medical Journal;9/14/2013, Vol. 347 Issue 7924, p15 

    The authors discuss the usage of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. They explain that catheter ablation was developed to cure atrial fibrillation, eradicate symptoms, and prevent stroke. They also note how trials have demonstrated that a small subgroup of drug resistant patients with...

  • ESC Congress 2012: Gold standards of success defined for AF ablation.  // Biomedical Market Newsletter;8/28/2012, Vol. 21, p1 

    The article informs that an international consensus statement has revealed the catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation have been defined gold standards of success.

  • Reasons to be cheerful about ablation. Ward, David E. // BMJ: British Medical Journal;10/5/2013, Vol. 347 Issue 7927, p22 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Caution Over Use of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation," by H. Van Brabandt et al. in the 2013 issue.

  • A Better Technique for Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation? Dimarco, John P. // Clinical Cardiology Alert;Sep2012, Vol. 31 Issue 9, p71 

    The author discusses a study by S.M. Narayan and colleagues on the clinical utility of impulse and rotor mapping to guide atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, which concluded that the technique was found to be quite effective in the case of patients with AF. A commentary is also presented on the...

  • Studies show success rates on the rise for catheter ablation procedures. Raible, Eric // Cardiology Today;Mar2009, Vol. 12 Issue 3, p15 

    The article discusses the results of a study on success rates of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) presented by Riccardo Cappato, an electrophysiologist with the Instituto Poli-clinico San Donator in Milan, Italy, at the Second Worldwide Survey on the Efficacy and Safety of Catheter...

  • Dabigatran in the setting of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the road ahead. Abdulhak, Aref A. Bin; Khan, Abdur Rahman; Tleyjeh, Imad M.; Wimmer, Alan P.; Provid├¬ncia, Rui; Albenque, Jean-Paul; Marijon, Eloi; Boveda, Serge // Heart;Feb2014, Vol. 100 Issue 4, p349 

    A letter to the editor is presented related to the therapeutic efficacy and safety profile of dabigatran in setting of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics