TITLE

CURFEW MUST NOT RING TONIGHT: JUDICIAL CONFUSION AND MISPERCEPTION OF JUVENILE CURFEW LAWS

AUTHOR(S)
KORECKY, ALEXANDER
PUB. DATE
October 2016
SOURCE
Capital University Law Review;Fall2016, Vol. 44 Issue 4, p831
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses what the author refers to as the judicial confusion and misperceptions that are associated with the various juvenile curfew laws in the U.S. as of 2016, and it mentions municipal ordinances, the legal rights of minors, and protected speech under the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment. The author's call for the Supreme Court of the U.S. to reassert its judicial authority regarding juvenile curfew laws is examined, along with American constitutional jurisprudence.
ACCESSION #
119170300

 

Related Articles

  • Recovering the Freedom of Speech. Haun, William J. // National Affairs;Winter2016, Vol. 26, p82 

    This article focuses on the Freedom of Speech Clause in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Topics covered include the failure of conservatives to recover the founders' notion of protected speech in the Free Speech Clause, the dominant jurisprudence on the Supreme Court with regards to...

  • THE PORNOGRAPHIC SECONDARY EFFECTS DOCTRINE. Fee, John // Alabama Law Review;2009, Vol. 60 Issue 2, p291 

    The secondary effects doctrine has made a muddle of First Amendment law. The doctrine formally holds that a speech regulation will be treated as content-neutral if its purpose is to control the secondary effects of speech, even if it facially discriminates according to speech content. It...

  • The Public Employee Political Freedom Act: Free Speech Protections Beyond the First Amendment. PHILLIPS, EDWARD G.; MORROW, BRANDON L. // Tennessee Bar Journal;Feb2019, Vol. 55 Issue 2, p26 

    No abstract available.

  • EMPHASIZING SUBSTANCE: MAKING THE CASE FOR A SHIFT IN POLITICAL SPEECH JURISPRUDENCE. Niedrich, Anastasia N. // University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform;Summer2011, Vol. 44 Issue 4, p1019 

    Political speech is vital to a functioning democracy and is highly protected. That much is hardly disputed. What courts, legal scholars, and those seeking to convey a political message do dispute is how political speech should be identified and protected, and who should decide what constitutes...

  • FROM FOUR PART TESTS TO FIRST PRINCIPLES: PUTTING FREE SPEECH JURISPRUDENCE INTO PERSPECTIVE. ROSENBERG, JOSHUA D.; DAVIS, JOSHUA P. // St. John's Law Review;Fall2012, Vol. 86 Issue 4, p833 

    The article discusses the First Amendment law regarding the freedom of speech in the U.S. to develop a framework for the analysis of the issues related to the free speech. Topics include informing about the differences between protected speech, unprotected speech, and protected but disfavored...

  • TRUE AND FALSE SPEECH. Guzelian, Christopher P. // Boston College Law Review;May2010, Vol. 51 Issue 3, p669 

    First Amendment law is structurally unstable because it does not adequately distinguish true and false speech. Free speech law, therefore, is "unpredictable," meaning that speakers cannot accurately predict whether their contemplated speech will suffer sanction. Unpredictable law causes the Rule...

  • Anti-eavesdropping laws could have a chilling effect on citizen engagement. Bischoff, Glenn // Urgent Communications Exclusive Insight;12/1/2011, p5 

    The article offers the author's view on the impact of anti-eavesdropping laws on citizen engagement in the U.S. He mentions a case which involves a Loyola University journalism professor who was demanded by a police officer to hand his phone for capturing an arrest scene. He notes that the...

  • PHOTOS OF THE FALLEN AND THE DOVER BAN: AN ANALYSIS OF BANNING THE MEDIA FROM PHOTOGRAPHING MILITARY COFFINS. Kelley, Bradford J. // Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy;Fall2016, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p116 

    The article argues that efforts to restrict media photography of military coffins returning from the battlefield violate the freedom of press and speech values underlying the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment. Topics discussed include legislative efforts to eliminate the ban; reviews important...

  • A NEW LOYALTY OATH: NEW YORK'S TARGETED BAN ON STATE FUNDS FOR PALESTINIAN BOYCOTT SUPPORTERS. LAWTON, LINDSEY // Review of Law & Social Change;2018, Vol. 42 Issue 4, p649 

    New York State's Executive Order 157 (2016) prohibits a single political group from receiving state funds: supporters of Palestinian Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS), a civil movement aimed at influencing Israeli government policy. This article analyzes the constitutional validity of New...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics