Zoltan, Paul
January 2017
Texas Bar Journal;Jan2017, Vol. 80 Issue 1, p32
The article discusses U.S. court cases related to immigration law including Mathis v. United States, in which the Supreme Court clarified whether a conviction renders a noncitizen deportable and the expansion of the "provisional waiver" program.


Related Articles

  • A step in the right direction.  // National Catholic Reporter;12/5/2014, Vol. 51 Issue 4, p28 

    The author discusses U.S. President Barack Obama's executive order on immigration to prevent deportation of 5 million people and to fix the U.S. immigration system, and mentions the views of Archbishop Sean O'Malley, on the same.

  • A Tale of Two Opinions: The Meaning of Statutes and the Nature of Judicial Decision-making in the Administrative Context. Vaughns, Katherine L. // Brigham Young University Law Review;1995, Vol. 1995, p139 

    The article examines the jurisprudence of U.S. Supreme Court Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Judge Robert H. Bork in the case Abourezk v. Reagan. Topics discussed include the case involving denial of visas to four foreign nationals, interpretation of a statutory provision in the U.S. Immigration...

  • Immigration. Kuck, Charles H.; Jensen, Keith N. // Mercer Law Review;Summer2014, Vol. 65 Issue 4, p1039 

    The article focuses on the U.S Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit's decision in cases addressing immigration law in 2013. Topics discussed include asylum cases involving factual determinations by an Immigration Judge and a de novo review by the U.S Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), case...

  • Why the Rule-of-Law Dictates That the Exclusionary Rule Should Apply in Full Force to Immigration Proceedings. MACDONALD, LINDSAY // University of Miami Law Review;Fall2014, Vol. 69 Issue 1, p291 

    This article discusses how and why the exclusionary rule should apply in the immigration context. The first part of the article sets out the history of the exclusionary rule in immigration proceedings, starting prior to the Lopez-Mendoza decision, moving to the decision itself, and then...

  • The Ordinary Remand Rule and the Judicial Toolbox for Agency Dialogue. Walker, Christopher J. // George Washington Law Review;Oct2014, Vol. 82 Issue 5, p1553 

    When a court concludes that an agency's decision is erroneous, the ordinary rule is to remand to the agency to consider the issue anew (as opposed to the court deciding the issue itself). Although the Supreme Court first articulated this ordinary remand rule in the 1940s and has rearticulated it...

  • Concrete Company Settles Federal Immigration-Related Claims. Ichniowski, Tom // ENR: Engineering News-Record;4/28/2014, Vol. 274 Issue 1, p7 

    The article reports on the settlement of the immigration-related claims filed against concrete work contractor Potter Concrete Ltd. The firm reportedly agreed to a fine of 115,000 dollars to resolve charges about its unlawful demands from newly hired non-U.S. citizens. Topics explored include...

  • PADILLA V. KENTUCKY: HOW MUCH ADVICE IS ENOUGH? STANTCHEVA, LILIA S. // New York University Law Review;Nov2014, Vol. 89 Issue 5, p1836 

    In Padilla v. Kentucky, the Supreme Court declared that defense attorneys must give advice to noncitizen defendants regarding the risk of deportation in order to meet the constitutional standard for effective assistance of counsel. Acknowledging the confusing nature of immigration law, the Court...

  • IMMIGRATION LAW. FREY, R. MARK // Bench & Bar of Minnesota;Sep2015, Vol. 72 Issue 8, p37 

    The article focuses on the legal development and the U.S. court cases related to the immigration law. Topics discussed include Nanic v. Lynch related to the denial of Bosnian petitioners' applications for asylum with rejection of their due process claims, Miranda-Romero v. Lynch related to the...

  • IMMIGRATION LAW — ALIEN DENIED ENTRY TO ANOTHER COUNTRY AND RETURNED INVOLUNTARILY TO UNITED STATES, NOT "FOUNDIN" UNITED STATES — United States v. Vasquez Macias, 740 F.3d 96 (2d Cir. 2014). Thomas, Maurica D. // Suffolk Transnational Law Review;Summer2014, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p503 

    The article discusses the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit's ruling in the 2014 case United States v. Vasquez Macias (Vasquez) which deals with American immigration laws, the rights of illegal aliens in the U.S., and Honduran resident Vasquez's reported deportation from the U.S....


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics