What exactly makes you a good GP?

Rowe, Dorothy
January 2004
Pulse;1/26/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 4, p52
Discusses what makes general practitioners good at their job. Differentiation between good practitioners and those who are not; Definition of the idea that good general practitioners take interest in people; Requirements for practitioners in understanding their patient.


Related Articles

  • General practitioners' attitudes and preparedness towards Clinical Decision Support in e-Prescribing (CDS-eP) adoption in the West of Ireland: a cross sectional study. Chee Peng Hor; O'Donnell, James M.; Murphy, Andrew W.; O'Brien, Timothy; Kropmans, Thomas J. B. // BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making;2010, Vol. 10 Issue 1, Special section p1 

    Background: Electronic clinical decision support (CDS) is increasingly establishing its role in evidence-based clinical practice. Considerable evidence supports its enhancement of efficiency in e-Prescribing, but some controversy remains. This study evaluated the practicality and identified the...

  • Mindfulness in Medicine, Mindfulness in Life. Williamson, Penelope R. // Families, Systems & Health: The Journal of Collaborative Family ;Spring2003, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p18 

    Comments on Ronald Epstein's article on cultivating and teaching reflective practice of medicine. Positive impact of the physician's mindfulness-in-action on patient care; Negative sequences of the lack of mindfulness; Capacities of physicians that lead to integral practice.

  • Everything Matters to Marketers. Swerdlick, Marc // Marketing Health Services;Spring2008, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p12 

    The article presents an overview of the important role marketing centric factors such as personality and customer perception play in having a successful and thriving medical practice. The case of a medical office which was given a personality makeover by a marketing consultant company called S...

  • Religious Characteristics of U.S. Physicians. Curlin, Farr A.; Lantos, John D.; Roach, Chad J.; Sellergren, Sarah A.; Chin, Marshall H. // JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine;Jul2005, Vol. 20 Issue 7, p629 

    Patients' religious commitments and religious communities are known to influence their experiences of illness and their medical decisions. Physicians are also dynamic partners in the doctor–patient relationship, yet little is known about the religious characteristics of physicians or how...

  • Breaking point?  // British Medical Journal;7/24/1976, Vol. 2 Issue 6029, p201 

    Focuses on the future of independent medicine. Proposal of Goodman intended to modify the doctors responsibilities; Frustration and failing morale among all sessions of medical doctors; Lack of emotional rhetoric among medical professionals.

  • Why it's called practice-based commissioning.  // Pulse;6/11/2005, Vol. 65 Issue 23, p23 

    Comments on the advantages and disadvantages of practice-based commissioning for general practitioners. Enhancement of out-of-hours care; Importance of definite guidance from the government; Imposition of incessant changes on general practice.

  • Medicine's second-class citizen: The patient. Heymann, Jody // Medical Economics;8/7/95, Vol. 72 Issue 15, p33 

    Recounts a doctor's experience as a patient in the hands of indifferent doctors. Doctors' refusal to reveal patient's state; Physical state of the patient; Hospital discharges that omit adequate follow-up care; Doctors' failure to inform patient on how to deal with pain upon discharge; Medical...

  • De profundis. Witherington, Elizabeth // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);6/17/89, Vol. 298 Issue 6688, p1654 

    Comments on the practices of physicians in the life of patients facing death. Story cited relative to the practice; Reflections on the personal bereavement from relatives of the patient; Scrutiny on the data manifested in the death certificate issued.

  • In your face: A new wave of militant doctors lashes out. Sibbald, Barbara // CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;06/02/98, Vol. 158 Issue 11, p1505 

    Discusses the approaches of doctors in four Canadian provinces to use job action and other militant approaches as leverage to encourage governments to improve health care and funding. Various responses of doctors in British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, and Quebec; Response from the government. ...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics