TITLE

A STUDY OF STRATEGIES USED IN THE PURSUIT OF LEGAL REGULATION OF SOCIAL WORK

AUTHOR(S)
Gaudy, John T.; Raymond, Frank B.
PUB. DATE
June 1979
SOURCE
Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare;Jun1979, Vol. 6 Issue 4, p464
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The debate regarding legal regulation in social work has continued for a number of years. The issues are varied, including the desirability of licensing, the lack of progress in the achievement of regulation, and the discrepancy as to the form of such regulation. The authors examined a topic area which they believe might be basic to the profession's problems with legal regulation, that being the procedure and process utilized by states in achieving such regulation. The primary purpose of the empirical research concerned the identification and description of strategies used by state chapters of the National Association of Social Workers in seeking legal regulation. The data collection instrument consisted of a mailed questionnaire with primarily fixed alternative items incorporating a wide variety of dimensions related to various aspects of the research problem. Questionnaires were mailed to all chapters of the National Association. Thirty-six instruments were returned for a 67 percent response rate. Both descriptive statistics and content analysis were utilized in analyzing the data. A number of intriguing and surprising findings were revealed, shedding more light on why such a small minority of states have achieved licensing legislation. Although the profession has publically committed itself to licensing, progress has been slow, in part, due to the strategies utilized by various chapters. The National Association of Social Workers' model statute, for example, has not been utilized as a true model in its entirity by chapters, rather "weakened" forms have been embraced. There even appears to be lack of agreement among chapter members regarding elements of a licensing bill. Furthermore, lobbyists have not been utilized extensively in the legislative process nor have coalitions of professional and lay groups. Chapters seeking licensure have not made well conceptualized utilization of either consensus or conflict strategies. A number of additional significant findings are discussed as are recommendations regarding changes in strategy used in the pursuit of legal regulation.
ACCESSION #
14387254

 

Related Articles

  • IInterior Design State Regulation: The Undermining Power of Perceptions. MOODY, DANA M.; PETTY, GREGORY; GIGLIO, WES // Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences;2015, Vol. 107 Issue 2, p49 

    Qualified interior designers meet the accepted criteria for legally protected professionals, including a direct impact on the health, safety, and welfare of the public. Although the field of interior design has made initial strides toward nationwide legal recognition as a profession, perceptions...

  • ETHNICITY, PROFESSFONALISM, AND BLACK PATERNALISM: IMPLICATIONS FOR SOCIAL WELFARE SERVICES. Bartlett, Robert S. // Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare;Spring1974, Vol. 1 Issue 3, p101 

    The article examines the effect of professionalism on community perception. The assumption around the use of nonprofessionals as members of the agency team suggest that the "bridge" function is enhanced when the new worker and the client-system are similar in such factors as ethnicity, class,...

  • Results from a National Study of Social Workers Sanctioned by State Licensing Boards. Boland-Prom, Kim W. // Social Work;Oct2009, Vol. 54 Issue 4, p351 

    This article presents the results of a descriptive study, synthesizing the reports of 27 state regulatory boards about their actions against certified and licensed social workers (N = 874) during the period of 1999 to 2004. The purpose of this study was to examine the unprofessional behavior of...

  • Work, or else: Welfare moms strive to meet the ultimatum. Nifong, Christina // Christian Science Monitor;7/1/96, Vol. 88 Issue 151, p10 

    Profiles four Massachusetts women. Teena Bruton; Olga Ortiz; Donna Zawacki; Phyllis Martin; How they are coping with Massachusetts' welfare reform law passed in November of 1995; The four women all saying they would rather have a well-paying job than rely on welfare benefits.

  • Who will stand for the children and the poor? Vann, Albert // New York Amsterdam News;03/22/97, Vol. 88 Issue 12, p12 

    Editorial. Discusses the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunities Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) of 1996 which was passed by the Republican-controlled Congress. President Bill Clinton's signing of the measure into law; Benefits of the welfare reform measure; Impact this measure could have...

  • Michigan looks ahead to federal reform. Miller, Gerald H. // Public Welfare;Spring96, Vol. 54 Issue 2, p10 

    Reports on the planned implementation of welfare reform in the state of Michigan. Change of the Michigan Department of Social Services to Family Independence Agency and the Aid to Families with Dependent Children to Family Independence Program; Focus on the protection of children from abuse and...

  • Welfare Reform: Doing Well, Trying to Do Better. Tweedie, Jack // State Legislatures;Jan2003, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p28 

    Focuses on welfare reform legislation in the U.S. Plan of Arkansas legislators regarding welfare reform in the state; Information on the decline in the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families spending in Mississippi; Details on the increase in welfare caseloads.

  • Penalizing the poor: Durational residency requirements for... Donahue, David A. // St. John's Law Review;Spring98, Vol. 72 Issue 2, p451 

    Examines how courts have applied Shapiro versus Thompson thus far in the era of welfare reform cases and proposes how Shapiro should have been applied in those cases. Discussion on Shapiro and its progeny; Explanation on the sources of the right to interstate migration; Description of welfare...

  • Welfare-reform bills heat up privatization issue. Markley, Jennifer // Inside Tucson Business;03/24/97, Vol. 6 Issue 52, p19 

    Reports on two welfare-reform bills in state legislature to radically change Arizona's welfare system. Expansion of the cash-assistance program; Representations of the bill on the attempt to revamp the state's welfare system; Goal of moving more recipients into jobs; Provision of limited...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of NEW JERSEY STATE LIBRARY

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics