TITLE

COMMENT: Nuclear Nonsense

PUB. DATE
November 1991
SOURCE
Progressive;Nov91, Vol. 55 Issue 11, p8
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents the author's observation on the nuclear power issue in the U.S. Almost everyone seems to have gotten the word about the disadvantages and dangers of nuclear power. In the mid-1970s, two out of three Americans favored building more nuclear power plants. By the time President Bush's pollster, Vincent Breglio, surveyed attitudes toward nuclear energy in the early part of 1991, two out of three Americans opposed building more nuclear power plants. In fact, none are being built. But, notes the Safe Energy Communication Council, despite huge losses, unresolved safety problems and the availability of safer and more cost-effective energy sources, the U.S. government and the nuclear utility industry are poised to repeat the same unnecessary buildup--at a cost of many more billions of dollars and further degradation of the environment. The Bush administration's National Energy Strategy, released in February 1991 at the height of the Persian Gulf War, is a pathetic but costly attempt to put the nuclear industry back on its feet. The public may have given up on nuclear power, but there is always somebody who does not get the word. Everyone who has assessed the risks of nuclear power knows that it is only a matter of time before the next calamitous accident occurs.
ACCESSION #
15038574

 

Related Articles

  • Nuclear renaissance.  // Professional Engineering;9/20/2006, Vol. 19 Issue 17, p33 

    The article focuses on the call to reinvigorate the nuclear industry in the government's energy review in Great Britain. The review emphasizes the contribution of nuclear power stations in meeting the country's energy policy goals. Also, the review suggested for the private sector to initiate,...

  • NUCLEAR FALLOUT….  // Personnel Today;6/5/2007, p2 

    The article informs that the union for scientists and engineers has warned that skills shortages could wreck the British government's nuclear-reliant energy policy. Two separate reports in 2006 have found that an overwhelming majority of companies in the nuclear industry were experiencing skills...

  • NUCLEAR POWER WORTHY OF PUBLIC INVESTMENT. Paterson, Andrew // Power Engineering;Oct2003, Vol. 107 Issue 10, p39 

    Deals with the issue of rejuvenating the nuclear power industry in the U.S. through an energy bill. Positive attitude of the American public towards nuclear power; Factors attributed to the attitude of the American public on nuclear power; Number of reactors under construction worldwide; Range...

  • Tough times for the forces of reaction.  // Marketing Week;12/1/2005, Vol. 28 Issue 48, p21 

    The article discusses the problem with communicating nuclear energy benefits in Great Britain. The current generation is prepared to believe that there is no chicanery to which the nuclear industry won't descend in supporting an untenable reputation. It would be accurate to depict the Energy...

  • The Czech Nuclear Power Industry in the European Context. Drábová, Dana // Czech Business & Trade;2005 Supplement, p10 

    This article discusses the Czech Republic's nuclear power industry within the context of the European Union's (EU) energy policy. The EU recognizes that it has no reasonable replacement for nuclear power plants in the next five decades. Safe use of nuclear energy in the country rests on three...

  • A Nuclear Renaissance? Terzo, Gerelyn // Investment Dealers' Digest;12/4/2006, Vol. 72 Issue 46, p14 

    The article presents information on the nuclear power industry of the United States. Nuclear industry of the U.S. came to a standstill after the meltdown of Three Mile Island Nuclear power plant. But today, nuclear energy staged for a comeback by the introduction of Energy Policy Act of 2005....

  • A real lack of energy? Atkinson, James // Contract Journal;7/19/2006, Vol. 434 Issue 6584, p9 

    The article reflects on the results of the review of the nuclear energy policy in Great Britain. He expects that the costs of designing, building and managing nuclear power plants will be covered by the private sector. He cites that there is no guarantee that the sector will obtain return on...

  • Electronics in nuclear power programme of India—An overview. SRIVASTAVA, G P // Sadhana;Oct2013, Vol. 38 Issue 5, p897 

    This paper presents an overview of state-of-the art developments in electronics for nuclear power programme of India. Indigenous activities in instrumentation and control (I&C) in the areas of detector development, nuclear instrumentation, monitoring and control electronics and special sensors...

  • U.S. President's National Energy Policy. Cheney,, Richard B. // Nuclear Plant Journal;Jul/Aug2001, Vol. 19 Issue 4, p47 

    Presents an excerpt of the 'National Energy Policy' report prepared by the National Energy Policy Group headed by United States Vice President Richard B. Cheney. Percentage of nuclear energy used in the US electricity generation; Improvement of the performance of nuclear energy plant...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics