TITLE

Employment law timetable 2005

AUTHOR(S)
Couzins, Martin
PUB. DATE
October 2004
SOURCE
Personnel Today;10/26/2004, p19
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents information on employment law. The Freedom of Information Act 2000 will come fully into force in January 1, 2005. The act allows requests for the disclosure of information held by public bodies. Laws related to working time limits for transport workers come into force on March 23, 2005. These laws control the number of hours that drivers are allowed to work. On April 6, 2005 information and consultation laws come into force. These laws establish a general framework for informing and consulting employees.
ACCESSION #
15171352

 

Related Articles

  • EU decision blocks competition.  // Railway Gazette International;Jul2005, Vol. 161 Issue 7, p398 

    The article announces the decision of the Council of Ministers to approve a Directive, which lays down working hours and conditions for train crew who cross frontiers between European Union (EU) member states, on June 2, 2005. This will apply the force of law to the terms of an agreement signed...

  • Transport Planning and the Working Time Directive. Woodhouse, Peter // Logistics & Transport Focus;Jun2002, Vol. 4 Issue 5, p64 

    It is a known fact that workers in the road transport industry are, as of June 2002, outside the scope of the working time regulations of Great Britain. Motivated by a desire to create a safer and more competitive high quality road transport system in the European Commission (EC), the commission...

  • Don't bank on holiday entitlement.  // Works Management;Sep2002, Vol. 55 Issue 9, p15 

    Reports on effect of a flaw in the Working Time Directive of the European Union (EU) on workers in Great Britain. Loss of legal holiday entitlement; Lack of differentiation between bank holidays and annual leave in the EU regulation; Appeal for an adoption of a minimum standard of the four week...

  • The ins and outs of the 48-hour week. Hagan, Pat // Commercial Motor;11/1/2007, Vol. 206 Issue 5252, p42 

    The article deals with the response of the European Union members to the British workers' right to opt out of the 48-hour week under the Working Time Directive (WTD). the Finnish presidency sought a compromise that capped the working week at 60 hours for anyone who did agree to work above the...

  • Delays ahead. Brown, Andrew // Motor Transport;11/11/2004, p10 

    Comments on the Working Time Directive for transportation workers to be implemented by the British government in 2005. Impact of the regulation on traffic offices; Opposition of labor unions to the regulation.

  • Legal Q & A Road Transport (Working Time) Regulation. Couzins, Martin // Personnel Today;11/9/2004, p12 

    The article presents questions related to problems in the field of personnel management with expert's answers. One of the questions raised the issue of coverage of mobile workers in road transport under Working Time Regulations of 1998 in Great Britain. The answer provides that the mobile staff...

  • Employers: 'Keep Out!' Beware intruding in employee web sites.  // HR Specialist: New York Employment Law;Jun2009, Vol. 4 Issue 6, p6 

    The article focuses on the laws enacted in the U.S. regarding the limits of encroachment on the off-duty employee activities by their employers. It reports New York's labor law restricting employees' termination based on their leisure time activities which include blogging and participation in...

  • Overtime Headache. Shanoff, Barry // Waste Age;Jun2005, Vol. 36 Issue 6, p26 

    The article examines the overtime law implemented by the U.S. federal government. The regulations under the Fair Labor Standards Act represented a revision of federal overtime law. The rules set standards for classifying employees as exempt from overtime benefits. The regulations guarantee...

  • Layoff for Refusal to Decline FLSA Award Is Illegal.  // Labor Law Journal;Mar69, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p189 

    This article focuses on employee rights. An employer's layoff of an employee who spurned the employer's request that she decline to accept government-ordered overtime pay unlawfully interfered with employees' protected rights. In reaching this conclusion, the NLRB notes that many of the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics