Not a Chance

Overman, Dean L.
September 1998
American Enterprise;Sep/Oct98, Vol. 9 Issue 5, p34
Focuses on the belief that life on Earth originated as a result of random accident. Discoveries that raise profound doubts about this belief; Explanation on the likelihood that random accidents turned inanimate matter into living matter; Information on the theories that matter `self-organized' itself into life according to the laws of physics.


Related Articles

  • Indian American finds answer to question of life.  // South Asian Post;11/14/2013, p13 

    The article focuses on the claim of finding the secrets of the beginning of life on Earth more than 3.8 billion years ago, by an Indian American scientist Sankar Chatterjee, professor of geo-sciences and curator of paleontology at the museum of Texas Tech University, Texas.

  • Life hits 4.1 billion years.  // Laboratory News;Dec2015, p4 

    The article discusses a research conducted at University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) that analyzed over 10,000 zircons, minerals that can preserve it's environment, thus indicating that life on earth began 4.1 billion years ago.

  • Born lucky. Davies, Paul // New Scientist;7/12/2003, Vol. 179 Issue 2403, p32 

    The article discusses several theories regarding the origin of life on Earth. From the record of rocks, most palaeobiologists are convinced that microbial life was flourishing on our planet as long as 3.5 billion years ago. Fossils from the Pilbara region of Western Australia imply that colonies...

  • Stuff of life. Schueller, Gretel // New Scientist;09/12/98, Vol. 159 Issue 2151, p30 

    Examines how astronomers are attempting to re-create outer space here on earth. Work of Luo Allamandola, David Deamer and Jason Dworkin; Details of their research into the origin on life which relies on mixing chemicals under conditions thought to have existed at the start of the Earth's...

  • FOOL'S GOLD. PARTRIDGE, MICHAELA // Australasian Science;Jan/Feb2011, Vol. 32 Issue 1, p27 

    The article offers information on how the mineral pyrite could be a valuable tool to study for evidence of the early evolution of life on Earth. The ancient rock can be used to identify diverse microbial habitat on early Earth and could determine not jut when and where particular organisms...

  • Life But Not As We Know It. Davies, Paul // Bulletin with Newsweek;08/10/99, Vol. 117 Issue 6186, p24 

    Discusses the attempt by scientists to find the origin of life on planet Earth. Louis Pasteur's experiment to disprove the theory of spontaneous generation of life; The experiments of Stanley Miller and Harold Urey; The gene sequencing of so-called hyperthermophiles, organisms that exist in the...

  • An Argument for the Cometary Origin of the Biosphere. Delsemme, Armand H. // American Scientist;Sep/Oct2001, Vol. 89 Issue 5, p432 

    Discusses the possible role of comets on the evolution of life on Earth. Composition of chrondritic meteorites which could have brought water, gases and organic molecules upon its collision with the Earth; Chemical evidence on the cometary origin of the biosphere; Characteristics of the...

  • The rise of life on earth. Monastersky, Richard; Mazzatenta, O. Louis // National Geographic;Mar98, Vol. 193 Issue 3, p54 

    Discusses the rise of life on earth. Comments from Stanley Miller, called the father of prebiotic chemistry; Details about his experiments and others; The difference in the definitions of life; The efforts of molecular biologists in studying RNA because they believe its roots reach back close...

  • The public goods hypothesis for the evolution of life on Earth.  // Biology Direct;2011, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p41 

    The article presents the Public Goods Hypothesis regarding the observed extent of horizontal gene transfers with the central metaphor of a great tree uniting all evolving entities on the planet earth. It mentions that nucleotide sequences including genes, promoters, and exons are simply seen as...

  • Is the transition from chemistry to biology a mystery? Kuhn, Hans // Journal of Systems Chemistry;2010, Vol. 1 Issue 1, p1 

    Today most chemists think that the answer to how life on earth emerged is still unknown. They assume a gap between chemistry and biology that is still unbridged. For chemists, understanding the origin of life requires the experimental modeling of a process that bridges this gap. They will not...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics