To create, or not to create?

Healy, Bernadine
March 2005
U.S. News & World Report;3/21/2005, Vol. 138 Issue 10, p59
Suggests that the United States is in the midst of a gold rush over human-embryo research. Various states that support stem cell research; Vote in the United Nations to call for all governments to ban the cloning of human embryos for any purpose; Lack of laws in the U.S. concerning stem cell research; How grasping critical differences between adult and embryonic cells, or the vocabulary of cloning, somatic cell nuclear transfer, or in vitro fertilization can be mind-boggling; The need for a national effort to develop legally enforceable guidelines to oversee human-embryo research.


Related Articles

  • Japan cuts red tape holding up stem-cell work.  // Nature;4/30/2009, Vol. 458 Issue 7242, p1090 

    The article reports regulatory changes in Japan that apply to embryonic stem-cell research. It will simplify the approval process for conducting such research and allow limited use of cloned human embryos. The plan was announced by a Japanese science ministry committee and it reportedly is...

  • The Practical Consequences of a National Human Embryonic Stem Cell Registry. Taymor, Kenneth; Scott, Christopher // Stem Cell Reviews & Reports;2009, Vol. 5 Issue 4, p315 

    The executive order and issuance of federal guidelines for human embryonic stem cell research are positive developments and will produce long-term benefits by creating a new registry for hESC lines. But there may be short-term costs caused by regulatory uncertainty, procedural delay, and...

  • A regulatory patchwork-human ES cell research oversight. Knowles, Lori P. // Nature Biotechnology;Feb2004, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p157 

    Predicts that the permissive regulations in a few regions of the world dictating where human embryonic stem (hES) cell research is taking place could change as numerous countries are still formulating policy. Summary of the debate over the ethical, societal and political implication of hES cell...

  • Stem cells: The crusader. Wadman, Meredith // Nature;2/10/2011, Vol. 470 Issue 7333, p156 

    The article focuses on how cellular physiologist Theresa Deisher had fought against embryonic-stem-cell research in the U.S. court with scientist James Sherley. It says that Deisher and her co-plaintiff Sherley filed a lawsuit seeking to stop the U.S. government from funding...

  • Stem Cell Research.  // Congressional Digest;Oct2001, Vol. 80 Issue 10, p225 

    Presents an overview of the embryonic stem cell research debate in the United States. Implications of President George W. Bush's decision to fund limited embryonic stem cell research; Status of stem cell research in the country; Arguments for and against stem cell research.

  • In brief.  // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);5/4/2002, Vol. 324 Issue 7345, p1054 

    Presents news briefs related to medicine as of May 4, 2002. Two doctors arrested for manslaughter after mistakenly injecting the cytotoxic drug vincristine into the spine instead of a vein of Wayne Jowett; Ban on the import of human embryonic stem cells passed by the German parliament;...

  • Gaps and overlaps: improving the current regulation of stem cells in the UK. Bell, Leanne; Devaney, Sarah // Journal of Medical Ethics;Nov2007, Vol. 33 Issue 11, p621 

    The article focuses on the need to improve the current regulation of human embryonic stem cells (hESC) in Great Britain. It states that the regulatory bodies that govern the resulting products and therapies are one of the complicated and uncertain legal provisions that the scientists must...

  • Embryonic stem cell bill gets Republican champion. Pecquet, Julian // Hill;6/29/2011, Vol. 18 Issue 95, p4 

    The article reports on the move of the Republican Representative Charlie Dent to co-sponsor the embryonic stem cell legislation, along with Representative Diana DeGette in the U.S.

  • The Frankenstein Factor. Glueck, Michael Arnold; Cihak, Robert J. // Orange County Business Journal;5/23/2005, Vol. 28 Issue 21, p51 

    The article authors comment on the decision of the California electorate to vote for 3 billion dollars in bonds to support stem cell research. California has put itself on the cutting edge of a controversial, and often confusing, scientific inquiry. To see how baffling the issues can be, one can...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics