TITLE

Wild Profits

AUTHOR(S)
Urstadt, Bryant
PUB. DATE
April 2005
SOURCE
Technology Review;Apr2005, Vol. 108 Issue 4, p74
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article discusses the report Arctic Petroleum Development: Implications of Advances in Technology by Terry R. Twyman of the U.S. Congressional Research Service. Central to the case for allowing exploration and drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is the argument that new technologies will allow the industry to get the oil out with minimal damage to the landscape and wildlife. In 2001, as the debate about the refuge was making its near-yearly round through Washington, D.C. and the media, Twyman's report was provide to members of the U.S. Congress. For the most part, the report was optimistic about the industry's ability to extract oil while minimizing environmental damage. The report argues that development in drilling technology will render a relatively small environmental impact on the refuge. But of all these technical advances, the environmental lobby, as might be expected, is skeptical. Environmentalists continue to doubt that Arctic exploration can be conducted with anything like minimal impact. They believe none of this innovations is compatible with wilderness, and exploration of the refuge will turn into an industrial corridor. It is not beyond reason, however, that the industry could drill with acceptability low impact. However, the current balance of power in the U.S. gives a good reason to conclude that the oil industry will not probably be able to deliver such impact.
ACCESSION #
16521044

 

Related Articles

  • Opening ANWR! Duke, Kim // Alaska Business Monthly;Jun2003, Vol. 19 Issue 6, p22 

    Reports on the plans of opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil and gas development in Alaska. Advocacy of Arctic Power for the development of the coastal plain; Impact of the oil development project on wildlife and the environment; Disinformation campaign against the opening of the...

  • Is ANWR The Answer To Our Energy Riddle? Nelson, Ronald // Pipeline & Gas Journal;May2005, Vol. 232 Issue 5, p45 

    Provides some insights into the development of petroleum resources in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge of northeast Alaska. Implementation of initial exploration tests using slim hole technology by heli-drill rigs to minimize the need for environmental damage; Oil production and transmission...

  • Hotspots!  // New Internationalist;Jun2001, Issue 335, p22 

    Provides information on several oil exploration locations. Reaction to planned opening of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to explorations; Impact of the utilization of oil fields in southern Sudan; Cost of the drilling project in Chad and Cameroon.

  • Senate leaders open doors to ANWR drilling.  // National Petroleum News;May2005, Vol. 97 Issue 5, p9 

    Reports that U.S. Senate leaders are intensifying pressure to allow oil drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) as part of the Senate's 2005-2006 budget. "Reasonable chance" language that will be included in the 2005-2006 budget to begin ANWR oil exploration; Reaction of the...

  • Exploring ANWR. Barnes, Scottie // Geospatial Solutions;Apr2005, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p10 

    Comments on a U.S. Senate vote in favor of drilling for oil in Area 1002 of Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Concerns that the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries cannot meet rising demand; Experts' prediction that the price could soar to $60; Arguments supporting or opposing...

  • Energy. Acomb, Deborah L. // National Journal;2/26/2005, Vol. 37 Issue 9, p629 

    Presents the results of separate public opinion polls conducted by Zogby and by Bellwether and Lake, Snell, Perry regarding the opening of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) in Alaska for oil exploration. Percentage of registered voters in the U.S. who favored opening the refuge if it...

  • A waste of energy? Borger, Gloria // U.S. News & World Report;4/1/2002, Vol. 132 Issue 10, p25 

    Discusses political conflict relating to proposed petroleum drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) in Alaska. Negligible environmental impact of the drilling; How the issue is seen as symbolic for both sides of the argument; Political ideas surrounding drilling in ANWR.

  • Why ANWR? Is there really any oil there? Palmer Jr., Irven F. // Alaska Business Monthly;Mar2011, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p116 

    In this article the author discusses aspects of the oil exploration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) in Alaska. He believes that the lack of government action to open exploration in ANWR is based on the misconception that all of the area will be explored and that people refuse to...

  • Washington Observer.  // ENR: Engineering News-Record;11/14/2005, Vol. 255 Issue 19, p61 

    The article informs that advocates and foes of opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska to oil and gas exploration have turned their attention to the House, after the Senate approved a measure to allow such drilling in part of the Alaska tract. Spurred by Gulf Coast hurricane recovery...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics