TITLE

A defence of the via negativa argument for physicalism

AUTHOR(S)
Montero, Barbara; Papineau, David
PUB. DATE
July 2005
SOURCE
Analysis;Jul2005, Vol. 65 Issue 3, p233
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents information on the via negativa argument for physicalism. The key premiss in the familiar causal argument for physicalism is the Completeness of Physics (CP). Given this premiss and assuming the implausibility of systematic causal overdetermination, it follows that everything that has a physical effect must itself be physical. Defenders of CP face Hempel's Dilemma: if "physical" means what is recognized by current physics, then CP is likely to be false, for historical form suggests that future research will substantially correct the ontology of current physics.
ACCESSION #
17518803

 

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics