Crossman, Brian
June 2005
Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review;2005, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p599
Academic Journal
The environmental justice movement aims to eradicate disparate siting of environmental hazards in minority and low-income communities. Prior to the Supreme Court's decision in Alexander v. Sandoval, environmental justice advocates had focused their efforts on enforcement of EPA's disparate-impact regulations. These regulations prohibit recipients of federal funding from administering any program that bas the effect of racial discrimination. However, the Sandoval decision declared that no private right of action existed to enforce the regulations. Despite this significant setback, the regulations may still be enforceable in circumstances where an appropriate statutory handle exists. For example, section 110(a)(2)(E) of the Clean Air Act requires states to provide assurances that their plans comply with federal law. To the extent the disparate-impact regulations remain valid federal law, they may be enforced through actions to compel EPA to reject plans that do not include the requisite assurances. This Note explores the substantive and procedural issues surrounding such actions.


Related Articles

  • Putting the `Law' Back into Environment Law. Schoenbrod, David // Regulation;1999, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p17 

    Discusses an interpretation of the law on environmental protection in the United States. Liability law for air pollution; Discussions on the relationship between administrative agencies and civil society in the US; Significance of the Clean Air Act of 1970; Criticisms on legislation on...

  • Citizen suits under the Clean Air Act: universal standing for the uninjured private attorney general? Alpert, Peter A. // Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review;Winter88, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p283 

    No abstract available.

  • CLEAR SKIES BRINGS CERTAINTY. Bruce, Janneke // Electric Perspectives;May/Jun2003, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p80 

    Explains the proposed legislation Clear Skies reducing emissions in the U.S. Reasons Cinergy chief executive officer Jim Rogers supports the multi-emissions scheme proposed in the legislation; Provision on reduction of mercury from power plants under the legislation; Partnership of the power...

  • On employee trip reductions, get involved or get a horse. Caruba, Alan // Northern New Jersey Business;2/8/95, Vol. 3 Issue 3, p35 

    Discusses the Clean Air Act and the New Jersey Traffic Congestion and Air Pollution Control Act. Cause of the state's air quality problem; Employee Commute Options Program; Cost of car inspections mandated by the Clean Air Act.

  • Changes to the Clean Air Act may ease the burden on business. Toft, Dennis M. // Northern New Jersey Business;9/6/95, Vol. 3 Issue 18, p43 

    Discusses the benefits of 1995 amendments to New Jersey's Clean Air Act of 1954 for businesses in the state. Department of Environmental Protection's (DEP) implementation of the reforms; Establishment of certain federally required fees that could provide an incentive to industry to reduce...

  • Clean air. Smith, Gregory H.; Needleman, Barry // Business NH Magazine;Feb97, Vol. 14 Issue 2, 1997 Manufacturers... p18 

    Discusses the provisions of the federal Clean Air Act. Environmental Protection Agency's proposal to tighten the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for particulate matter and ozone; Revision of the RSA 125-1 statute governing regulation of toxic air pollutants; Planning tips for...

  • Flexibility in Title V permits. Belden, Roy // Industrial Paint & Powder;Mar96, Vol. 72 Issue 3, p14 

    Focuses on Title V permits, required licenses for major sources of air contaminants under the Clean Air Act Amendments. Maximization of operational flexibility; Implementation of day-to-day changes in response to market demand; Preparation of application for the permit; Negotiating and drafting...

  • Why not enact a pollution tax? Reich, Robert B. // Long Island Business News (7/1993 to 5/2009);9/5/2003, Vol. 50 Issue 38, p50A 

    Shares insights on the rule imposed by U.S. President George Bush's administration that will allow industrial units to make extensive upgrades without having to install anti-pollution devices; Reaction of industry and environmentalists towards the rule; Citation of the Clean Air Act; Need for a...

  • Clearing the Air Over the Clean Air Act. Reynolds, Larry // Management Review;Jun90, Vol. 79 Issue 6, p45 

    Discusses the ramifications of the U.S. Congress' efforts to rewrite the 1970 Clean Air Act. Focus on air pollution; Legislators' scheduled revision of federal solid and hazardous waste laws; Evidence that voters are increasingly concerned about the impact of the environment on their health and...


Read the Article

Other Topics