TITLE

Connecticut Files Court Challenge to NCLB

AUTHOR(S)
Archer, Jeff
PUB. DATE
August 2005
SOURCE
Education Week;8/31/2005, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p23
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that Connecticut last week became the first and, so far, only state to sue over the federal No Child Left Behind Act, a move that some analysts say could embolden policymakers elsewhere to step up their varied challenges to the U.S. administration's signature education law. The suit, filed in U.S. District Court in Hartford on August 22, argues that federal funding to Connecticut falls far short of what is needed to meet the law's testing and accountability requirements, a violation of the U.S. Constitution and provisions in the nearly 4-year-old statute itself.
ACCESSION #
18279888

 

Related Articles

  • No Child Left Behind reform that we can all support. McKeon, Buck // Hill;9/18/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 106, p49 

    The article discusses the author's views concerning the enhancement of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act in the U.S. He expresses that NCLB allows the schools to track student progress, and improves the flexibility in the development of state accountability systems. The author also believes that...

  • Democrats Move to Slash 'Reading First.'. Manzo, Kathleen Kennedy; Hoff, David J. // Education Week;6/13/2007, Vol. 26 Issue 41, p24 

    The article focuses on the U.S. House of Representatives plan to cut federal education funds to the Reading First program in favor of other programs such as the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act programs and Title I program for disadvantaged students. Reportedly, Democrats are seeking to increase...

  • 'Dear Senator…'. Fletcher, Geoffrey H. // T H E Journal;Apr2006, Vol. 33 Issue 9, p15 

    The article discusses the author's experience of meeting with a Capitol staffer in Washington, D.C. concerning issues on educational policies. The author meets the staffer to tell her that he supports the reinstatement of funding, at least $496 million per year, for Title II D of the No Child...

  • What Works vs. Whatever Works. Petrilli, Michael J. // Education Week;7/26/2006, Vol. 25 Issue 43, p44 

    The article discusses the two ideological forces at work in the No Child Left Behind bill. The legislation is being pulled in two directions, one by people who believe in scientifically proven methods of education and while the other believe in using whatever means work to teach students....

  • GOP BillWould Give More Title I Flexibility. Hoff, David J. // Education Week;6/13/2007, Vol. 26 Issue 41, p25 

    The article focuses on a proposed bill that would allow school districts in the U.S. more flexibility with federal funding. The No Child Left Behind Act provides federal grants, half of which can be used for teacher quality, school technology, and Title one programs for disadvantaged students....

  • Perkins Act Renewal Is Finished. Smallen, Jill; Mitchell, Charlie; Friel, Brian // National Journal;7/29/2006, Vol. 38 Issue 30, p49 

    This article reports that the U.S. Congress this week was poised to send President George W. Bush a renewal of the Perkins Act, a popular $1.2 billion-a-year program that funds high school and college classes in carpentry, business administration, nursing, and other career-oriented fields. The...

  • Unkept promises of NCLB expose the need for reform. Dodd, Chris // Hill;9/18/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 106, p45 

    The article discusses the proposed No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Reform Act in the U.S. It explores the aim of the bill which is to offer accurate access to student learning such as standardized tests, as well as additional funds for students who need it most. It also states that NCLB will ensure...

  • Department Raps States On Testing. Olson, Lynn // Education Week;7/12/2006, Vol. 25 Issue 42, p1 

    The article reports that the U.S. Department of Education has notified 10 states that it intends to withhold a portion of their state administrative funds under the Title T program for their failure to comply fully with the testing provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act by the end of the...

  • Race to the Top offers clues to ESEA reauthorization. Manthey, George // Leadership;Mar/Apr2010, Vol. 39 Issue 4, p15 

    The article presents the author's views on the Race to the Top Program under the 2001 No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of U.S. and its introduction in California. The author states that there is a greater need for NCLB than the U.S. Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965. He also...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics