TITLE

Utah School Officials Reject 'Intelligent Design'

PUB. DATE
October 2005
SOURCE
Church & State;Oct2005, Vol. 58 Issue 9, p3
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports that Utah's State Board of Education has rejected a proposal to introduce intelligent design (ID) into public school science courses. Basis of the school officials in rejecting the proposal; Preference of the board to keep evolution in the biology curriculum; Assertion of the board member Bill Colbert that ID was inappropriate for the public schools.
ACCESSION #
18609097

 

Related Articles

  • Michigan School Board Flunks 'Intelligent Design'.  // Church & State;Dec2006, Vol. 59 Issue 11, p3 

    The article reports the decision of the Michigan State Board of Education not to teach "intelligent design" in the state's biology courses. The board cast an 8-0 vote to block the subject from high school biology classes. A federal judge ruled in Pennsylvania that intelligent design is a...

  • What They're Saying.  // Curriculum Review;Mar2006, Vol. 45 Issue 7, p3 

    The article presents views from public figures and personalities on issues related to education and curriculum. In a ruling by federal judge John E Jones III, he opines that while intelligent arguments may be true, a proposition on which the court takes no position, intelligent design is not...

  • One Nation, Under... The Watchmaker?: Intelligent Design and the Establishment Clause. Schuneman, Nicholas A. // BYU Journal of Public Law;2008, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p179 

    The article examines the constitutionality of teaching the Intelligent Design hypothesis in public schools in the U.S. The Intelligent Design hypothesis is primarily a response to and critique of the theory of evolution by natural selection, which was first elaborated by Charles Darwin. This...

  • Ohio Education Board Reverses Course On Promoting 'Intelligent-Design' Creationism.  // Church & State;Mar2006, Vol. 59 Issue 3, p17 

    The article reports on the decision of the Ohio Education Board to eliminate intelligent design from the state science standards. Americans United threatened to file a case against the removal of evolution instruction in schools. Other critics of intelligent design usage claimed that the lesson...

  • Immunology in the spotlight at the Dover 'Intelligent Design' trial. Bottaro, Andrea; Inlay, Matt A.; Matzke, Nicholas J. // Nature Immunology;May2006, Vol. 7 Issue 5, p433 

    The article reflects on the issue regarding the introduction of intelligent design in a biology class in one of the public schools in the U.S. Several government agencies and religious institutions, assisted with scientific support by the National Center for Science Education, a nonprofit...

  • Class Dismissed!: How The AU Team Tackled ID In California. Lynn, Barry W. // Church & State;Feb2006, Vol. 59 Issue 2, p23 

    The article discusses the battle of the Americans United for the Separation of Church and State against the teaching of intelligent design in Frazier Mountain High School in California. The course was viewed as a kind of infomercial for creationism and is thought to violate the church-state...

  • AN EVOLVING CONFLICT. Tebo, Margaret Graham // ABA Journal;Mar2006, Vol. 92 Issue 3, p20 

    The article discusses issues involving the legality of the mandatory teaching of intelligent design in Los Angeles, California. Intelligent design is not creationism, which the U.S. Supreme Court barred from the public school curriculum in 1987 according to lawyer Casey Luskin. After parents of...

  • The Manufacturing of Controversy: Debating Intelligent Design in Public. Whidden, Rachel Avon // Conference Proceedings -- National Communication Association/Ame;2003, Vol. 1, p705 

    An essay is presented on the rhetorical strategy of intelligent design (ID) theorists in Ohio. It explores the opposition of ID theorists on the recommendation of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) to keep ID separate from science. It analyzes the consequence when...

  • Debating Design. Munro, Neil // National Journal;1/7/2006, Vol. 38 Issue 1, p36 

    The article presents a debate over intelligent design versus the arguments for or against the theory of evolution by Charles Darwin. To undermine the authority of evolution, intelligent-design advocates publish what they say are scientific critiques of evolution, highlight what they call...

Share

Other Topics