TITLE

Other Schools of Thought

AUTHOR(S)
Adams, William Lee
PUB. DATE
November 2005
SOURCE
Newsweek;11/28/2005, Vol. 146 Issue 22, p57
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the debate over the teaching of evolution in public schools in the United States. In 1925, high school teacher John Scopes was found guilty of teaching evolution. In 1987, the Supreme Court ruled that the Creationism Act in Louisiana, which promoted the teaching of creationism in public schools, was unconstitutional. Now, some people are pushing for intelligent design to be taught in public schools. A group of parents in Pennsylvania have sued the school board after it mandated that teachers promote intelligent design. In Kansas, the state's school board voted to adopt science standards that point to gaps in the evolutionary theory.
ACCESSION #
18904508

 

Related Articles

  • Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.  // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;May-Jun2006, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p23 

    The article reports on the contradiction of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB) of teaching intelligent design (ID) and creationism in U.S. schools. FASEB believes that science education has been an important force in driving innovation and discovery. With this,...

  • Closing Statement for the Plaintiffs in Kitzmiller v Dover. Rothschild, Eric; Hamilton, Pepper // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Jan-Apr2006, Vol. 26 Issue 1/2, p26 

    The article presents information on the Kitzmiller v. Dover case which was brought to court in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. The case is about the integration of intelligent design into science curriculum at Dover School Districts headed by William Buckungham and Alan Bonsell who voted to change the...

  • THE EVOLUTION WARS. Wallis, Claudia; August, Melissa; Caplan, Jeremy; Chu, Jeff; Richards, Constance E.; Healy, Rita; Maag, Christopher; Norman, Bud; Pitluk, Adam; Ressner, Jeffrey; Scully, Sean // Time;8/15/2005, Vol. 166 Issue 7, p26 

    Focuses on the controversy surrounding the teaching of evolutionary biology and intelligent design in American public schools. View of U.S. President George W. Bush that lessons in evolutionary biology should be combined with a discussion of intelligent design; View of intelligent design...

  • The Judge Who Ruled for Darwin. Ridley, Matt // Time;5/8/2006, Vol. 167 Issue 19, p82 

    The article focuses on Judge John Jones, who ruled against proponents of intelligent design, calling the phrase a relabelling of creationism designed to get around a 1987 judicial ban on teaching creationism as science in public schools. The article discusses the increased impact of the judge's...

  • School Science Debate Still in Session. Fivecoat-Campbell, Kerri // World & I;Aug2006, Vol. 21 Issue 7, p22 

    The article discusses the debate between creationism and the theory of evolution in U.S. schools. Wesley Elsberry of the National Center for Science Education thinks the debate was rekindled in 1950 when the Pope issued a statement urging church members not to believe in evolution. According to...

  • Q: Whatever Happened to Creationism? A: It's Still Around. Moyer, Wayne A. // Education Week;3/21/1984, Vol. 3 Issue 26, p24 

    The article focuses on the scientific creationism in the education curriculum. The coverage topics related to evolution in various biology textbooks are presented in the article. The exploitations made by the fundamentalist colleges on the certification of biology graduates to teach in public...

  • Devolution and Dinosaurs: The Anti-Evolution Seminar in the European Parliament. Kutschera, Ulrich // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Sep/Oct2006, Vol. 26 Issue 5, p10 

    The article presents information concerning teaching of evolutionary theory in Europe, which was discussed during an anti-evolution seminar for members of the European Parliament (EP) in Brussels, Belgium. A publication, which addressed the proceedings of the meeting, reported on comments of a...

  • Proponents of Creationism but not Proponents of Evolution Frame the Origins Debate in Terms of Proof. Barnes, Ralph; Church, Rebecca // Science & Education;Mar2013, Vol. 22 Issue 3, p577 

    In Study 1, 72 internet documents containing creationism, ID (intelligent design), or evolution content were selected for analysis. All instances of proof cognates (the word 'proof' and related terms such as 'proven', 'disproof', etc.) contained within these documents were identified and labeled...

  • Bad Science: Genetics, as Misread by Creationism. BRANCH, GLENN // GeneWatch;Aug-Oct2013, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p29 

    The article reports on how creationists use the field of genetics to disprove evolution. It discusses the rejection of evolution which advocates the idea of common descent by creationism in favor of supernatural creation, the main division within Christian creationism and the concept of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics