TITLE

Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument

AUTHOR(S)
Tsai, D. F.-C.
PUB. DATE
November 2005
SOURCE
Journal of Medical Ethics;Nov2005, Vol. 31 Issue 11, p635
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Human embryonic stem cell research can bring about major biomedical breakthroughs and thus contribute enormously to human welfare, yet it raises serious moral problems because it involves using human embryos for experiment. The "moral status of the human embryo" remains the core of such debates. Three different positions regarding the moral status of the human embryo can be categorised: the "all" position, the "none" position, and the "gradualist" position. The author proposes that the "gradualist" position is more plausible than the other two positions. Confucius's moral principle of jen, which proposes a unique theory of "love of gradation", and the principle of yi, which advocates "due treatment for persons", are then explored. The author then argues that our moral obligations to do good to other living organisms, persons, and our families are different. Putting together the "gradualist" position on the human embryo, and Confucius's theories of "love of gradation" and "due treatment for persons", the author concludes that the early embryo has less ethical significance than the later fetus and adult human. The moral obligation we have toward persons is clearer and stronger than that which we have toward human embryos. Embryo research is justifiable if it brings enormous welfare to human persons that cannot be otherwise achieved. The "love of gradation" requires us, however, to extend love and respect towards other entities according to their different states. We should therefore be very cautious in using human embryos for research, acknowledging the gradualist nature of their moral status.
ACCESSION #
19080855

 

Related Articles

  • Ethics for embryos. Parker, C. // Journal of Medical Ethics;Oct2007, Vol. 33 Issue 10, p614 

    This paper responds to DW Brock's technically strong case the use of human embryonic stem cells in medical research. His main issue in this context is the question of whether it is moral to destroy viable human embryos. He offers a number of reasons to support his view that it is moral to...

  • A FRESH LOOK AT STEM CELL RESEARCH.  // njbiz;4/18/2005, Vol. 18 Issue 16, p3 

    Offers a look at the status of stem cell research in New Jersey as of April 2005. Move of several drug and medical device companies to conduct stem cell research; Opposition of religious groups on using human embryos for research; Efforts of several Republican legislators to push for...

  • The Frankenstein Factor. Glueck, Michael Arnold; Cihak, Robert J. // Orange County Business Journal;5/23/2005, Vol. 28 Issue 21, p51 

    The article authors comment on the decision of the California electorate to vote for 3 billion dollars in bonds to support stem cell research. California has put itself on the cutting edge of a controversial, and often confusing, scientific inquiry. To see how baffling the issues can be, one can...

  • Consent to the use of aborted fetuses in stem cell research and therapies. Pfeffer, N.; Kent, J. // Clinical Ethics;2006, Vol. 1 Issue 4, p216 

    This paper identifies the legal and policy framework relating to the use of aborted fetuses in stem cell research and therapies and contrasts this with the collection of embryos for research. It suggests that more attention should be given to questions about the kind of consent sought by...

  • Embryonic Stem Cell Research: A Moral Defense. Kamm, F. M. // APA Newsletters;Spring2003, Vol. 2 Issue 2, p202 

    Examines the moral importance of human embryos in embryonic stem cell (ESC) research. Arguments advanced on the medical benefits of ESC research; Sources of ESC; Guidelines for federally-funded research involving ESC; Way to reopen the option of cloning as a source of ESC; Problems with...

  • Patents, Royalties, and Publicly Funded Stem Cell Research. Debaets, Amy Michelle // Ethics & Medicine: An International Journal of Bioethics;Fall2005, Vol. 21 Issue 3, p188 

    The article offers views on the controversy over the public funding of human embryonic stem cell research. It provides information on the state of the embryonic stem cell research in California and New Jersey. Potential of human embryonic stem cell lines in the U.S. is discussed. It suggests the...

  • Embryos and pseudoembryos: parthenotes, reprogrammed oocytes and headless clones. Watt, Helen // Journal of Medical Ethics;Sep2007, Vol. 33 Issue 9, p554 

    The article focuses on a proposal to create pseudoembryos using different techniques which include oocyte-assisted reprogramming and genetic interventions. The use of standard embryonic stem cells, from damaged human embryos whose potentials are blocked, met opposition due to moral...

  • FINDING ETHICALLY ACCEPTABLE SOLUTIONS FOR THERAPEUTIC HUMAN STEM CELL RESEARCH. Meyer, John R. // Ethics & Medicine: An International Journal of Bioethics;Spring2008, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p51 

    Katrien Devolder offers a compromise solution for the derivation of human embryonic stem cells that is designed to appease those who consider the killing of human embryos immoral. She proposes to build on a gradualist view of embryonic development in which the embryo merits special respect as...

  • The person, the soul, and genetic engineering. Polkinghorne, J. C. // Journal of Medical Ethics;Dec2004, Vol. 30 Issue 6, p593 

    Argument about the ethical possibility of the therapeutic use of embryonic stem cells depends critically on the evaluation of the moral status of the very early embryo. Some assert that at the blastocyst stage it is only potentially human, not yet possessing the full ethical status of...

Share

Read the Article

Other Topics