Halloran, Liz
February 2006
U.S. News & World Report;2/27/2006, Vol. 140 Issue 7, p30
This article discusses the upcoming case before the U.S. Supreme Court that will determine the constitutionality of a Vermont Law that limits how much a political candidate can spend on a campaign. The court will also be indirectly reviewing a previous decision in Buckley v. Valeo that allows candidates to spend as much as they please. Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell will argue for the law against the Vermont Republican Party's attorneys.


Related Articles

  • What If...Buckley were Overturned? Morrison, Alan B. // Constitutional Commentary;Summer99, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p347 

    Discusses the effects of the United States (US) Supreme Court decision in the Buckley v. Valeo case on the election campaign finance in the US. Details on the decision; Basis for overruling the decision; Impact on other cases; Conclusion.

  • A TRIGGER TOO FAR?: THE FUTURE OF TRIGGER FUNDING PROVISIONS IN PUBLIC CAMPAIGN FINANCING AFTER DAVIS V. FEC. Wexler, Eric H. // University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law;May2011, Vol. 13 Issue 4, p1141 

    The article presents information on the issues related to campaign spending including private campaign financing and corruption. A focus is on the trials of Buckley v. Valeo and Davis v. FEC. The self-financing for campaigns, case laws related to the U.S. lower courts and the decisions of the...

  • Discussing a Lifetime Of Achievements.  // Public Citizen News;Jul/Aug2013, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p8 

    An interview with retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, recipient of the Lifetime Achievement Award from consumer rights advocacy group Public Citizen, is presented. When asked if he still reads every opinion, he admits to doing so, finding some interesting reading. Justice...

  • Take the wealth primary to court. Bonifaz, John // Social Policy;Fall95, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p21 

    This article offers views on how to make campaign finance reform in the U.S. a reality as of 1995. The author relates that for years, the campaign finance question has been posed in the courts as a question of the First Amendment rights of well-financed candidates and wealthy contributors. The...

  • SAVING BUCKLEY: CREATING A STABLE CAMPAIGN FINANCE FRAMEWORK. Abraham, J. Robert // Columbia Law Review;May2010, Vol. 110 Issue 4, p1078 

    Since 1976, Buckley v. Valeo's contribution-expenditure distinction has been the touchstone of the campaign finance framework. Currently, lower courts are addressing the constitutionality of contribution limits to independent expenditure committees and some have adopted doctrinal approaches that...

  • Passing the Buckley. Rosen, Jeffrey // New Republic;10/27/97, Vol. 217 Issue 17, p4 

    Contends that a successful campaign finance reform in the U.S. can only be made by revisiting the arguments used by the Supreme Court in its 1976 ruling on the case Buckley versus Valeo. Examination on the arguments of the Supreme Court; Distinction made by the Supreme Court between...

  • THE SLOW, JUST, UNFINISHED DEMISE OF THE BUCKLEY COMPROMISE: Randall v. Sorrell, 126 S. Ct. 2479 (2006). Coleman, James // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Fall2006, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p427 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Randall versus Sorrell which dealt with a Vermont's law concerning contributions to campaign funds with reference to Buckley versus Valeo. The Court ruled that Vermont's contribution limits violated the First Amendment because they were too low....

  • GLITTERING GENERALITIES AND HISTORICAL MYTHS. Paul Stevens, Justice John // University of Louisville Law Review;Spring2013, Vol. 51 Issue 3, p419 

    In this article, the author focuses on the glittering generalities as well as the historical myths reflected in the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in Buckley v. Valeo in 1976. He offers information on the statutory limitations on independent campaign expenditures justified by interests in...

  • Money Managers. Tomasky, Michael // Newsweek Global;2/22/2013, Vol. 161 Issue 8, p1 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, which deals with campaign finance reform in the U.S. Topics include the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the "spending as speech" doctrine from...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics