TITLE

Two Cheers for Darwin

AUTHOR(S)
Ruse, Michael
PUB. DATE
March 2006
SOURCE
Science & Spirit;Mar/Apr2006, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p46
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the issue over the proposed teaching of intelligent design (ID) to schools in the U.S. alongside Charles Darwin's evolution theory. President George W. Bush favored this alternative theory, which states that behind the earth's evolution somebody is interfering. It cites the case filed against a Pennsylvania school board by parents of students who are required to undergo ID. Judge John E. Jones favored the complainants believing that the school was wrong in implementing ID.
ACCESSION #
19939225

 

Related Articles

  • Whether ID is Science. Jones III, John E. // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Jan-Apr2006, Vol. 26 Issue 1/2, p20 

    An excerpt from the memorandum opinion of Judge John E. Jones III for Tammy Kitzmiller v. Dover School District case is presented.

  • Teaching Evolution: An Overview. Madelaine, Imber, // Australia Points of View: Teaching Evolution;2019, p1 

    General information regarding teaching evolution in schools is presented. The author reviews the history of evolution within scientific communities and examines its relationship to Christianity and its rejection by fundamentalist Christians. The article notes that evolutionary theory is accepted...

  • Point: Schools Should Teach Evolution, not Creationism or Intelligent Design. Auman, Heidi J // Australia Points of View: Teaching Evolution;2019, p2 

    The article presents an argument for teaching evolution. The author argues that evolution is a widely accepted scientific theory and that treating religious theories such as intelligent design or creationism as comparable undermines a scientific education. A brief history of debate surrounding...

  • Getting Over Dover. Johnson, Phillip E. // Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity;Sep2006, Vol. 19 Issue 7, p12 

    The author discusses the issue concerning Darwin's theory of evolution and Intelligent Design and comments on the decision of federal district judge John E. Jones of the Middle District of Pennsylvania in a case involving the Dover, Pennsylvania school board. Jones has declared the policy of the...

  • Evolution after Dover. Heath, Erin // BioScience;Apr2006, Vol. 56 Issue 4, p300 

    The article praises the vigilance shown by scientists following the ruling of U.S. District Court Judge John E. Jones III to reject the Dover, Pennsylvania, Area School District's inclusion of intelligent design in its science curriculum. But scientists like Kenneth R. Miller, Francisco J....

  • A Message From the Mimivirus.  // Discover;Mar2006, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p31 

    The article discusses the decision of U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III in December 2005 that intelligent design is not science. It provides the argument presented by Jones in his ruling. The reaction of the proponents of intelligent design to the ruling is given. It also mentions the...

  • The 'Intelligent Design' Decision: America's Newspapers Speak Out.  // Church & State;Feb2006, Vol. 59 Issue 2, p8 

    The article presents several commentaries from newspapers on the controversy related to intelligent design in the U.S. "The Washington Post" cited the claim of judge John E. Jones that intelligent design is a religious topic. "The New York Times" praised judge Jones for his integrity and...

  • DARWIN IN THE DOCK. Talbot, Margaret // New Yorker;12/5/2005, Vol. 81 Issue 39, p66 

    This article speculates on the ruling of Judge John E. Jones III over the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District case about whether it is constitutional for public-school classes to present the argument of intelligent design. Proponents of intelligent design claimed that it was a bold new...

  • A JUDGE OF CHARACTER. Chapman, Matthew // Humanist;Jan/Feb2009, Vol. 69 Issue 1, p24 

    This article profiles Judge John E. Jones, who presided over Kitzmiller v. Dover, a controversial trial involving the teaching of evolution. Jones was appointed to his judgeship in 2003 in Pennsylvania. His decision rejected creationism and intelligent design. In 2008, he would receive the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics