TITLE

VICTORY IN DOVER!

AUTHOR(S)
Boston, Rob
PUB. DATE
February 2006
SOURCE
Church & State;Feb2006, Vol. 59 Issue 2, p4
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the decision of the court that declared the adoption of intelligent design in the curriculum in a public school as illegal in Dover, Pennsylvania. District Judge John E. Jones ruled that the program was unconstitutional because of its violation of the First Amendment's separation of the church and state. He further claimed that intelligent design is religious-related.
ACCESSION #
20246428

 

Related Articles

  • Pennsylvania District Stops Teaching ID.  // District Administration;Feb2006, Vol. 42 Issue 2, p18 

    The article discusses the U.S. District Court's denunciation of a school board introducing intelligent design into the science curriculum. This left the district abandoning the controversial topic. The Dover Area School Board in December introduced intelligent design, separate from evolutionary...

  • Class Dismissed!: How The AU Team Tackled ID In California. Lynn, Barry W. // Church & State;Feb2006, Vol. 59 Issue 2, p23 

    The article discusses the battle of the Americans United for the Separation of Church and State against the teaching of intelligent design in Frazier Mountain High School in California. The course was viewed as a kind of infomercial for creationism and is thought to violate the church-state...

  • Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial. Branch, Glenn // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Sep-Dec2007, Vol. 27 Issue 5/6, p4 

    The article outlines the impact of the court decision on the case, Kitzmiller vs. Dover, in Dover, Pennsylvania. Judge John E. Jones III, the federal judge who presided over the case, ruled that the move undertaken by the school to require the presentation of "Intelligent Design" as an...

  • What They're Saying.  // Curriculum Review;Mar2006, Vol. 45 Issue 7, p3 

    The article presents views from public figures and personalities on issues related to education and curriculum. In a ruling by federal judge John E Jones III, he opines that while intelligent arguments may be true, a proposition on which the court takes no position, intelligent design is not...

  • The Manufacturing of Controversy: Debating Intelligent Design in Public. Whidden, Rachel Avon // Conference Proceedings -- National Communication Association/Ame;2003, Vol. 2, p705 

    An essay is presented on the rhetorical approach of intelligent design (ID) theorists in the case of Ohio as it spread out in public documents, radio shows, polls, and newspapers. It defines a manufactured controversy as the one that legitimizes and necessitates the inclusion of alternatives in...

  • CALIFORNIA SCHEMIN'. Boston, Rob // Church & State;Feb2006, Vol. 59 Issue 2, p10 

    The article focuses on the efforts of several parents to stop the teaching of intelligent design at the Frazier Mountain High School in California. The parents prevailed in their fight when the school's board of trustees decided to end the class and not offer it again. The course was engineered...

  • On ID in Public Schools.  // Perspectives on Science & Christian Faith;Sep2008, Vol. 60 Issue 3, p183 

    The author asserts that the theological concept of Intelligent Design (ID) should not be taught in schools. The author believes that people who are advocating for ID have been reacting to some of the arguments, the rhetoric, and the political activism of secularists in the society. The author...

  • Keeping religion out of science class.  // Nature;8/11/2005, Vol. 436 Issue 7052, p753 

    Reports on the criticism of the science community on U.S. President George W. Bush's endorsement of intelligent design to schools. Concerns on the teachings of creationism in schools; Plan of the government to include intelligent design in school curriculum; Need for the country to improve its...

  • One Nation, Under... The Watchmaker?: Intelligent Design and the Establishment Clause. Schuneman, Nicholas A. // BYU Journal of Public Law;2008, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p179 

    The article examines the constitutionality of teaching the Intelligent Design hypothesis in public schools in the U.S. The Intelligent Design hypothesis is primarily a response to and critique of the theory of evolution by natural selection, which was first elaborated by Charles Darwin. This...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics