TITLE

Civil-Rights Rules Will Not Apply to Guaranteed Loans

PUB. DATE
March 1982
SOURCE
Education Week;3/24/1982, Vol. 1 Issue 26, p2
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that universities and colleges whose only form of federal aid is through the Guaranteed Student Loans will no longer be subject to the U.S. Department of Education's regulations that prevent sex discrimination. On this regard, the Department of Justice has stressed out that colleges whose students are receiving Pell Grants and schools receiving any direct federal subsidies will continue to be subject of the civil rights regulations.
ACCESSION #
20512229

 

Related Articles

  • College May Be Dangerous for Men. SCHLAFLY, PHYLLIS // Human Events;9/19/2011, Vol. 67 Issue 32, p18 

    The article criticizes the Dear Colleague Letter (DCL) sent by the Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights to colleges and universities for adopting the feminist theory that in all sexual controversies or accusations, the man is guilty unless proven innocent. It details how the DCL...

  • Feds Signal Tougher Title IX Enforcement: Cases at U of Montana, Butler U, Roxbury CC.  // Women in Higher Education (10608303);Jun2012, Vol. 21 Issue 6, p3 

    The article reports on the investigations conducted by the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) of the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) as part of enforcing Title IX of the Education Amendments.

  • Campus Outrage. Pesta, Abigail // Marie Claire (US Edition);Jul2011, Vol. 18 Issue 7, p82 

    The article focuses on the sexual harassment complaint filed by Yale University students with the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights. The complaint, of violation of Title IX law related to gender discrimination in education, has been filed against male students who marched...

  • Title IX and the Importance of a Reinvigorated OCR. Galles, Kristen // Human Rights;Summer2010, Vol. 37 Issue 3, p18 

    The article comments on the Title IX statute and the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) of the U.S. Department of Education. As stated, the Title IX is the primary means for resolving the problem of sex discrimination in education and directs the federal agencies to issue rules consistent with the...

  • "PROMPT AND EQUITABLE" EXPLAINED. Block, Jason A. // College Student Affairs Journal;Spring2012, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p61 

    An April 2011 "Dear Colleague" letter issued by the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights provided new guidance related to Title IX and the civil rights violation inherent in sexual harassment cases. Using the "Dear Colleague" letter as a guide, this article will provide best...

  • Strengthening Title IX.  // ED Review;4/30/2010, p1 

    The article focuses on a Dear Colleague letter withdrawing a 2005 interpretation of Title IX policy issued by the U.S. administration. Title IX, which was enacted in 1972, prohibits sex discrimination among educational institutions that receive federal aid for programs and activities. Based on...

  • Rules on Single-Sex Education Allow Room to Experiment. Davis, Michelle R. // Education Week;3/10/2004, Vol. 23 Issue 26, p11 

    Public schools once blocked from teaching boys and girls separately would find it easier to embrace single-sex classes and schools under new federal regulations issued last week. The long-awaited regulations from the U.S. Department of Education would relax a previously strict interpretation of...

  • AFTER THE COMMISSION; THE GOVERNMENT'S INADEQUATE RESPONSES TO TITLE IX'S NEGATIVE EFFECT ON MEN'S INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS. Ganzi, Danielle M. // Boston University Law Review;Apr2004, Vol. 84 Issue 2, p543 

    Comments on the response of the U.S. government to the negative effects of Title IX of the Education Amendments on men's intercollegiate athletics. Passage of Title IX and the other documents issued to aid its interpretation; Interpretation and enforcement of the Title IX by the judiciary;...

  • Judge Says District Can Keep Offering Single-Sex Classes.  // Education Week;2/13/1985, Vol. 4 Issue 21, p4 

    The article reports that Francis L. Young, a federal administrative law judge, ruled that the Pickens County School District in South Carolina can continue to offer both single-sex and coeducational physical-education classes because the said programs do not receive federal funds. Young claimed...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics