TITLE

Pennsylvania E.R.A Invoked in Challenge To School's `Boys Only' Admission Policy

PUB. DATE
August 1982
SOURCE
Education Week;8/18/1982, Vol. 1 Issue 40, p13
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the complaint filed by the Women's Law Project and the National Organization for Women Inc. against Girard College regarding the all-male admissions policy of elementary and secondary school for indigent children in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The suit charges that the school is violating an amendment to the state's constitution that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex.
ACCESSION #
20563661

 

Related Articles

  • Calif. opens single-sex academies. Reinhard, Beth // Education Week;09/10/97, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p1 

    Focuses on the initiative launched by California concerning the opening of single-gender middle schools. Legal experts' doubts on the system's ability to survive court challenges; Prior discrimination complaints filed against schools founded to educate boys or girls exclusively.

  • Central Connecticut State Settles Gender Bias Suit with Three Female Professors.  // Women in Higher Education (10608303);Mar2012, Vol. 21 Issue 3, p5 

    The article reports on Central Connecticut State University's settlement of a lawsuit accusing the school and its president of gender discrimination.

  • California Lutheran High School sued for discrimination. Baldman, Anthony // Gay & Lesbian Times;1/5/2006, Issue 941, p14 

    The article reports on the lawsuit filed against the California Lutheran High School Association for the expulsion of two alleged lesbian students in Riverside County, California. The lawsuit was filed by the students and their parents. School principal Gregory Bork was also named defendant in...

  • California school boards don't want to protect gay students. DeKoven, Rob // Gay & Lesbian Times;8/14/2008, Issue 1077, p32 

    The article discusses the court case wherein the plaintiff accused the Poway High School in California of being responsible for failing to protect its GLBT students from harassment.

  • Scrutiny scrutinized. Samborn, Hope Viner // ABA Journal;Sep96, Vol. 82 Issue 9, p29 

    Reports on a United States Supreme Court decision upholding that the Virginia Military Institute's male-only admissions policy violates the Constitution's guarantee of equal protection. Implication of the decision for other gender-based claims; Positive reaction from women's rights groups...

  • New Litigation Issues May Impact Certification of Fitness Professionals. Herbert, David L. // Sports Medicine Standards & Malpractice Reporter;Jan2008, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p8 

    This article offers information on the lawsuit filed by the National Strength and Conditioning Association Certification Commission against the National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA) in El Paso County, Colorado. The complaint raised important issues to the entire accreditation...

  • New Litigation Issues May Impact Certification of Fitness Professionals. Herbert, David L. // Exercise Standards & Malpractice Reporter;Dec2007, Vol. 21 Issue 6, p81 

    This article presents information on the lawsuit filed by the National Strength and Conditioning Association Certification Commission by the National Strength and Conditioning Association in El Paso County, Colorado. The complaint raised important issues to the entire accreditation process for...

  • Former owners clash over demise of RFW. Hull, Tim // Inside Tucson Business;6/25/2001, Vol. 11 Issue 14 

    Reports the conflict between owners of organizations in Tucson, Arizona. Details on the lawsuit filed against Nancy Faville, former president of Resources For Business; Competition with Resources For Women; Financial problems of the organizations.

  • Volunteer leaders as spokespeople. Jacobs, Jerald A. // Association Management;Jan1998, Vol. 50 Issue 1, p116 

    Looks at legal concerns relating to public relations activities of association. Importance of avoiding defamation; Benefits of not engaging in communication which can be construed as fostering agreements in violation of antitrust laws; Risk of claims for personal injuries or property damage.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics