TITLE

California

PUB. DATE
May 2005
SOURCE
Reports of the National Center for Science Education;May-Aug2005, Vol. 25 Issue 3/4, p15
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the views made by California State Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O'Connell during a conference at the Los Angeles Natural History Museum on September 28, 2005, regarding the decision of public school science classes in the state to accept intelligent design. Evidently, the introduction of intelligent design has been deemed to make a negative impact to the integrity of education in the state. Further, O'Connell advocates that religious beliefs are based on faith and are not subject to scientific test and refutation, and thus, should not be taught in the realm of natural sciences.
ACCESSION #
20745319

 

Related Articles

  • One Nation, Under... The Watchmaker?: Intelligent Design and the Establishment Clause. Schuneman, Nicholas A. // BYU Journal of Public Law;2008, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p179 

    The article examines the constitutionality of teaching the Intelligent Design hypothesis in public schools in the U.S. The Intelligent Design hypothesis is primarily a response to and critique of the theory of evolution by natural selection, which was first elaborated by Charles Darwin. This...

  • Ohio Education Board Reverses Course On Promoting 'Intelligent-Design' Creationism.  // Church & State;Mar2006, Vol. 59 Issue 3, p17 

    The article reports on the decision of the Ohio Education Board to eliminate intelligent design from the state science standards. Americans United threatened to file a case against the removal of evolution instruction in schools. Other critics of intelligent design usage claimed that the lesson...

  • AN EVOLVING CONFLICT. Tebo, Margaret Graham // ABA Journal;Mar2006, Vol. 92 Issue 3, p20 

    The article discusses issues involving the legality of the mandatory teaching of intelligent design in Los Angeles, California. Intelligent design is not creationism, which the U.S. Supreme Court barred from the public school curriculum in 1987 according to lawyer Casey Luskin. After parents of...

  • Utah School Officials Reject 'Intelligent Design'  // Church & State;Oct2005, Vol. 58 Issue 9, p3 

    Reports that Utah's State Board of Education has rejected a proposal to introduce intelligent design (ID) into public school science courses. Basis of the school officials in rejecting the proposal; Preference of the board to keep evolution in the biology curriculum; Assertion of the board...

  • Immunology in the spotlight at the Dover 'Intelligent Design' trial. Bottaro, Andrea; Inlay, Matt A.; Matzke, Nicholas J. // Nature Immunology;May2006, Vol. 7 Issue 5, p433 

    The article reflects on the issue regarding the introduction of intelligent design in a biology class in one of the public schools in the U.S. Several government agencies and religious institutions, assisted with scientific support by the National Center for Science Education, a nonprofit...

  • Class Dismissed!: How The AU Team Tackled ID In California. Lynn, Barry W. // Church & State;Feb2006, Vol. 59 Issue 2, p23 

    The article discusses the battle of the Americans United for the Separation of Church and State against the teaching of intelligent design in Frazier Mountain High School in California. The course was viewed as a kind of infomercial for creationism and is thought to violate the church-state...

  • States Raise Bar for High School Diploma. Olson, Lynn // Education Week;6/22/2005, Vol. 24 Issue 41, p1 

    The article that it has been less than six months since the nation's governors gathered for a summit on high schools, and already at least half a dozen states have enacted policies that require students to complete tougher academic programs to earn a diploma. Although Arizona lawmakers voted to...

  • What They're Saying.  // Curriculum Review;Mar2006, Vol. 45 Issue 7, p3 

    The article presents views from public figures and personalities on issues related to education and curriculum. In a ruling by federal judge John E Jones III, he opines that while intelligent arguments may be true, a proposition on which the court takes no position, intelligent design is not...

  • The Manufacturing of Controversy: Debating Intelligent Design in Public. Whidden, Rachel Avon // Conference Proceedings -- National Communication Association/Ame;2003, Vol. 2, p705 

    An essay is presented on the rhetorical approach of intelligent design (ID) theorists in the case of Ohio as it spread out in public documents, radio shows, polls, and newspapers. It defines a manufactured controversy as the one that legitimizes and necessitates the inclusion of alternatives in...

Share

Read the Article

Other Topics