'Dear Senator…'

Fletcher, Geoffrey H.
April 2006
T H E Journal;Apr2006, Vol. 33 Issue 9, p15
The article discusses the author's experience of meeting with a Capitol staffer in Washington, D.C. concerning issues on educational policies. The author meets the staffer to tell her that he supports the reinstatement of funding, at least $496 million per year, for Title II D of the No Child Left Behind Act, which is Enhancing Education Through Technology. He also supports the E-rate, specifically Senate Bill 241 and House Bill 2533, which would prevent stoppages in E-rate funding such as occurred last year.


Related Articles

  • No Child Left Behind reform that we can all support. McKeon, Buck // Hill;9/18/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 106, p49 

    The article discusses the author's views concerning the enhancement of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act in the U.S. He expresses that NCLB allows the schools to track student progress, and improves the flexibility in the development of state accountability systems. The author also believes that...

  • Fighting the Good Fight. Wolf, Mary Ann; Hall, Sara // T H E Journal;Jul2005, Vol. 32 Issue 12, p48 

    This article focuses on issues concerning Title II D: Enhancing Education Through Technology (EETT) of the No Child Left Behind Act of the U.S. According to Title II D, the states must show how technology will be integrated throughout all of their curriculum and instruction by December 31, 2006....

  • Perkins Act Renewal Is Finished. Smallen, Jill; Mitchell, Charlie; Friel, Brian // National Journal;7/29/2006, Vol. 38 Issue 30, p49 

    This article reports that the U.S. Congress this week was poised to send President George W. Bush a renewal of the Perkins Act, a popular $1.2 billion-a-year program that funds high school and college classes in carpentry, business administration, nursing, and other career-oriented fields. The...

  • Democrats Move to Slash 'Reading First.'. Manzo, Kathleen Kennedy; Hoff, David J. // Education Week;6/13/2007, Vol. 26 Issue 41, p24 

    The article focuses on the U.S. House of Representatives plan to cut federal education funds to the Reading First program in favor of other programs such as the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act programs and Title I program for disadvantaged students. Reportedly, Democrats are seeking to increase...

  • GOP BillWould Give More Title I Flexibility. Hoff, David J. // Education Week;6/13/2007, Vol. 26 Issue 41, p25 

    The article focuses on a proposed bill that would allow school districts in the U.S. more flexibility with federal funding. The No Child Left Behind Act provides federal grants, half of which can be used for teacher quality, school technology, and Title one programs for disadvantaged students....

  • Connecticut Files Court Challenge to NCLB. Archer, Jeff // Education Week;8/31/2005, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p23 

    The article reports that Connecticut last week became the first and, so far, only state to sue over the federal No Child Left Behind Act, a move that some analysts say could embolden policymakers elsewhere to step up their varied challenges to the U.S. administration's signature education law....

  • What Works vs. Whatever Works. Petrilli, Michael J. // Education Week;7/26/2006, Vol. 25 Issue 43, p44 

    The article discusses the two ideological forces at work in the No Child Left Behind bill. The legislation is being pulled in two directions, one by people who believe in scientifically proven methods of education and while the other believe in using whatever means work to teach students....

  • Unkept promises of NCLB expose the need for reform. Dodd, Chris // Hill;9/18/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 106, p45 

    The article discusses the proposed No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Reform Act in the U.S. It explores the aim of the bill which is to offer accurate access to student learning such as standardized tests, as well as additional funds for students who need it most. It also states that NCLB will ensure...

  • Plan to Zero Out U.S. Technology Grants Draws Fire. Trotter, Andrew // Education Week;3/1/2006, Vol. 25 Issue 25, p10 

    This article reports that a $272 million program to help states and school districts use technology for education would be axed under U.S. President George W. Bush's fiscal 2007 budget, partly because the White House says it lacks rigorous data on its effectiveness. But education groups...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics