Money and Institutional Power

Ansolabehere, Stephen; Snyder Jr., James M.
June 1999
Texas Law Review;Jun99, Vol. 77 Issue 7, p1673
Academic Journal
Claims that the volume of interest group contributions to political campaigns for an elected office is proportional to the power of that office in the United States. Framework for thinking about money in elections that points to the proposal; Evidence of the pattern from the Senate and gubernatorial elections; Implications of money as a measure of institutional power.


Related Articles

  • CAMPAIGN FINANCE AND THE NEW DEAL: DID THE MASS CONSUMPTION INDUSTRIES SUPPORT THE DEMOCRATS IN THE 1936 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION? Webber, Michael J. // Journal of Political & Military Sociology;Winter91, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p253 

    This article is a contribution to the continuing sociological debate on how structures of economic power are connected to political processes, especially political parties, in the United States. It examines the claim that mass consumption industries supported the Democrats in 1936 because their...

  • Votes for sale. Sandel, Michael J. // New Republic;11/18/96, Vol. 215 Issue 21, p25 

    Deals with the propensity of self-interest individuals or groups to bribe politicians with campaign contributions in the U.S. Role of money in politics; Problematic aspects on the role of money in politics; Measures proposed by reformers to reduce the power of money across the U.S. political...

  • Politics and money: Search for dirt isn't the point. Harwood, Richard C. // Christian Science Monitor;9/29/97, Vol. 89 Issue 213, p19 

    Opinion. Discusses fundamental questions central to the issue of money and politics. Why citizens in the United States are indifferent to the Congressional hearings on campaign finance; The dissatisfaction, disillusionment and disengagement that most citizens feel; The need to determine which...

  • Introduction: Money, Politics, and Equality. Rosenkranz, E. Joshua; Hasen, Richard L. // Texas Law Review;Jun99, Vol. 77 Issue 7, p1603 

    Discusses the interplay of money, politics and equality in the United States. Reasons for the exploration on how campaign finance may regulate political equality; Reasons for the avoidance of using the term political equality in stating the goal of campaign finance regulations.

  • Dialing (and Redialing) for Dollars. SHRIBMAN, DAVID // Fortune;5/12/1997, Vol. 135 Issue 9, p36 

    Opinion. Discusses the irony in politicians publicly claiming they are for campaign reform and then privately seeking more funding. The new political atmosphere surrounding political fundraising; The cultural questions; The public's attack on how Washington, D.C. politicians work.

  • Eyes on the Prize.  // New York Times Upfront (Teacher's Edition);10/30/2000, Vol. 133 Issue 5, p3 

    Presents classroom strategies on helping students understand the role of money in politics in the United States. Reasons why people donate large amounts of money to political candidates; Debate on whether large campaign donations are the equivalent of bribery; Online information on how much...

  • Who should pay for political campaigns? Greene, Wade // Columbia Journalism Review;Jan/Feb1974, Vol. 12 Issue 5, p24 

    This article comments on several issues about political reform campaigns in the U.S., as of 1974. Senator Joseph R. Biden, Jr. of Delaware has given a disturbing account of the way campaign financing routinely tends to corrupt the electoral process. And Biden is now a prominent member of a...

  • STRATEGY FOR REALIGNMENT. McLaughlin, John // National Review;5/31/1985, Vol. 37 Issue 10, p20 

    The article comments on the realignment strategies of the Republican Party to assume power in the U. S. after the six-year reign of the incumbent Democrats. Key issues discussed include the efforts by the Republicans to persuade influential Democrats to join their party, the re-registration of...

  • Hating Politics, Loving Government. IKEDA, SANDY // Freeman: Ideas on Liberty;May2014, Vol. 64 Issue 4, p28 

    The article discusses the concept of political rhetoric in the U.S. referring to persuasive talk in the service of achieving dominance in the use of violent aggression. The essential role of lying and deception to politics and the inseparability of the politics from government are outlined. It...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics