TITLE

No Child Left Behind Act: States Face Challenges Measuring Academic Growth: GAO-06-948T

PUB. DATE
July 2006
SOURCE
GAO Reports;7/28/2006, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Government Documents
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA) requires that states improve academic performance so that all students reach proficiency in reading and mathematics by 2014 and that achievement gaps close among student groups. States set annual proficiency targets using an approach known as a status model, which calculates test scores 1 year at a time. Some states have interest in using growth models that measure changes in test scores over time to determine if schools are meeting proficiency targets. The Chairman of the Committee on Education and the Workforce asked GAO to testify on its recent report on measuring academic growth. Specifically, this testimony discusses (1) how many states are using growth models and for what purposes, (2) how growth models can measure progress toward achieving key NCLBA goals, and (3) what challenges states face in using growth models especially to meet the law's key goals. While growth models may be defined as tracking the same students over time, GAO used a definition that also included tracking the performance of schools and groups of students. In comments on the report, Education said that this definition could be confusing. GAO used this definition of growth to reflect the variety of approaches states were taking. Nearly all states were using or considering growth models for a variety of purposes in addition to their status models as of March 2006. Twenty-six states were using growth models, and another 22 were either considering or in the process of implementing them. Most states using growth models measured progress for schools and for student groups, and 7 also measured growth for individual students. States used growth models to target resources for students that need extra help or award teachers bonuses based on their school's performance. Certain growth models are capable of tracking progress toward the goals of universal proficiency by 2014 and closing achievement gaps. For example, Massachusetts uses its model to set targets based on the growth that it expects from schools and their student groups. Schools can make adequate yearly progress (AYP) if they reach these targets, even if they fall short of reaching the statewide proficiency targets set with the state's status model. Tennessee designed a model that projects students' test scores and whether they will be proficient in the future. In this model, if 79 percent of a school's students are predicted to be proficient in 3 years, the school would reach the state's 79 percent proficiency target for the current school year (2005-2006). States face challenges measuring academic growth, such as creating data and assessment systems to support growth models and having personnel to analyze and communicate results. The use of growth models to determine AYP may also challenge states to make sure that students in low-performing schools receive needed assistance. U.S. Department of Education (Education) initiatives may help states address these...
ACCESSION #
21805135

 

Related Articles

  • No Child Left Behind Act: States Face Challenges Measuring Academic Growth That Education's Initiatives May Help Address: GAO-06-661. Johnson, Henry L. // GAO Reports;7/28/2006, p1 

    The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA) requires that states improve academic performance so that all students reach proficiency in reading and math by 2014 and that achievement gaps close among student groups. States set annual proficiency targets using an approach known as a status model, which...

  • No Waiver Left Behind. POSEY, LEE // State Legislatures;Jun2014, Vol. 40 Issue 6, p25 

    The article focuses on the expansive federal education law of 2002 known as the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) law for which the U.S. Department of Education has allowed flexibility by granting states waivers from burdensome provisions. Topics discussed include the nature of waivers received by...

  • Contracts Awarded For NCLB Centers. Viadero, Debra // Education Week;10/12/2005, Vol. 25 Issue 7, p20 

    The article focuses on contracts for providing advice to states and school districts on meeting the demands of the educational laws in the U.S. The U.S. Department of Education has awarded contracts for 20 new, comprehensive centers to provide advice to school districts on meeting the demands of...

  • the teachers' lounge. Barlow, Dudley // Education Digest;Apr2006, Vol. 71 Issue 8, p65 

    The article focuses on the problems faced by the schools under No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. For the 2003-04 school year, 73% of Florida schools were identified as in need of improvement under criteria of the NCLB Act. One year later, that figure had been cut almost in half, to 37.4%. In...

  • IG Report Questions Law's Unsafe-Schools Option. Maxwell, Lesli A. // Education Week;8/15/2007, Vol. 26 Issue 45, p23 

    The article looks at a report released by the inspector general's office in the U.S. Department of Education which outlines the weaknesses of a provision in the No Child Left Behind Act to identify dangerous schools and allow students to transfer out of them. The report also makes...

  • Waivers for NCLB Requirements Offered.  // Electronic Education Report;10/3/2011, Vol. 18 Issue 19, p5 

    The article reports on the move of the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama to waive some requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. It notes that such decision allows states to waive parts of the education law which appeared to be impractical and ineffective to make students...

  • Secretary Spellings Launches Priorities for NCLB Reauthorization.  // Special Education Technology Practice;Mar/Apr2007, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p6 

    The article focuses on Building on Results: A Blueprint for Strengthening the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act launched by U.S. Department of Education Secretary Margaret Spellings. It says the program is aimed at providing additional tools to schools and educators to assist students read and do...

  • States to Face Uniform Rules On Grad Data. Hoff, David J.; McNeil, Michele // Education Week;4/9/2008, Vol. 27 Issue 32, p1 

    The article reports on reform of the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act law of 2001 to set a uniform way for states to calculate and report their graduation rates. It cites rules to be proposed by Margaret Spellings, Secretary of Education in the U.S. Department of Education so that all states use...

  • One System for One Graduation.  // District Administration;Aug2006, Vol. 42 Issue 8, p15 

    The article discusses the changes needed to have a system for measuring graduation rates based on the report "Who's Counted? Who's Counting? Understanding High School Graduation Rates," by the Alliance for Excellent Education in the U.S. Comparable and accurate graduation rates should be...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics