TITLE

No Child Left Behind Act: States Face Challenges Measuring Academic Growth That Education's Initiatives May Help Address: GAO-06-661

AUTHOR(S)
Johnson, Henry L.
PUB. DATE
July 2006
SOURCE
GAO Reports;7/28/2006, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Government Documents
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA) requires that states improve academic performance so that all students reach proficiency in reading and math by 2014 and that achievement gaps close among student groups. States set annual proficiency targets using an approach known as a status model, which calculates test scores 1 year at a time. Some states have interest in using growth models that measure changes in test scores over time to determine if schools are meeting proficiency targets. To determine the extent that growth models were consistent with NCLBA's goals, GAO assessed (1) the extent that states have used growth models to measure academic achievement, (2) the extent that growth models can measure progress in achieving key NCLBA goals, and (3) the challenges states may face in using growth models to meet adequate yearly progress (AYP) requirements and how the Department of Education (Education) is assisting the states. To obtain this information, we conducted a national survey and site visits to 4 states. While growth models are typically defined as tracking the same students over time, GAO used a definition that also included tracking schools and groups of students. In comments, Education said that this definition could be confusing. GAO used this definition of growth to reflect the variety of approaches states were taking. Twenty-six states were using growth models, and another 22 were considering or in the process of implementing growth models, as of March 2006. States were using or considering growth models in addition to status models to measure academic performance and for other purposes. Seventeen states were using growth models prior to NCLBA. Most states using growth models measured progress for schools and for student groups, and 7 also measured growth for individual students. States used growth models to target resources for students that need extra help or award teachers bonuses based on their school's performance. Certain growth models can measure progress in achieving key NCLBA goals. If states were allowed to use these models to determine AYP, they might reduce the number of lower-performing schools identified for improvement while allowing states to concentrate federal dollars in the lowest-performing schools. Massachusetts sets growth targets for schools and their student groups and allows them to make AYP if they meet these targets, even if they do not achieve state-wide goals. Some lower-performing schools may meet early growth targets but not improve quickly enough for all students to be proficient by 2014. If these schools make AYP by showing growth, their students may not benefit from improvement actions provided for in the law. States face challenges measuring academic growth--such as creating data and assessment systems to support growth models--that Education's initiatives may help address. The ability of states to use growth models to make AYP determinations depends on the complexity of the model they...
ACCESSION #
21805136

 

Related Articles

  • No Child Left Behind Act: States Face Challenges Measuring Academic Growth: GAO-06-948T.  // GAO Reports;7/28/2006, p1 

    The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA) requires that states improve academic performance so that all students reach proficiency in reading and mathematics by 2014 and that achievement gaps close among student groups. States set annual proficiency targets using an approach known as a status model,...

  • the teachers' lounge. Barlow, Dudley // Education Digest;Apr2006, Vol. 71 Issue 8, p65 

    The article focuses on the problems faced by the schools under No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. For the 2003-04 school year, 73% of Florida schools were identified as in need of improvement under criteria of the NCLB Act. One year later, that figure had been cut almost in half, to 37.4%. In...

  • Waivers for NCLB Requirements Offered.  // Electronic Education Report;10/3/2011, Vol. 18 Issue 19, p5 

    The article reports on the move of the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama to waive some requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. It notes that such decision allows states to waive parts of the education law which appeared to be impractical and ineffective to make students...

  • Secretary Spellings Launches Priorities for NCLB Reauthorization.  // Special Education Technology Practice;Mar/Apr2007, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p6 

    The article focuses on Building on Results: A Blueprint for Strengthening the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act launched by U.S. Department of Education Secretary Margaret Spellings. It says the program is aimed at providing additional tools to schools and educators to assist students read and do...

  • NCLB: Progress Report. Meserve, Susie E. // Tech & Learning;May2006, Vol. 26 Issue 10, p6 

    The article presents No Child Left Behind (NCLB) progress report. Fourth annual report on the impact of NCLB has been released by the Center on Education Policy (CEP). According to the report, 78 percent of the districts surveyed showed an increase in student achievement on state tests used by...

  • No Waiver Left Behind. POSEY, LEE // State Legislatures;Jun2014, Vol. 40 Issue 6, p25 

    The article focuses on the expansive federal education law of 2002 known as the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) law for which the U.S. Department of Education has allowed flexibility by granting states waivers from burdensome provisions. Topics discussed include the nature of waivers received by...

  • Contracts Awarded For NCLB Centers. Viadero, Debra // Education Week;10/12/2005, Vol. 25 Issue 7, p20 

    The article focuses on contracts for providing advice to states and school districts on meeting the demands of the educational laws in the U.S. The U.S. Department of Education has awarded contracts for 20 new, comprehensive centers to provide advice to school districts on meeting the demands of...

  • Report: Schools Could Improve on NCLB Tutoring, Choice. Davis, Michelle R. // Education Week;4/12/2006, Vol. 25 Issue 31, p31 

    The article presents a report on the No Child Left Behind Act in the U.S. It is seen that students are not taking advantage of tutoring options under the program. According to the Department of Education, schools identified as needing improvement has nearly doubled in recent years. The report on...

  • We hear from readers. McQuillan, Larry; Failla, Karin // Curriculum Review;May2006, Vol. 45 Issue 9, p2 

    The article reports on the launch of the Web site of the National High School Center at the American Institutes for Research in May 2006. The National School Center which is a part of a national network of Content and Regional Comprehensive Centers funded by the U.S. Department of Education. Its...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of NEW JERSEY STATE LIBRARY

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics