TITLE

"Tell Me Where It Hurts": Workplace Sexual Harassment Compensation and the Regulation of Hysterical Victims

AUTHOR(S)
Makela, Finn
PUB. DATE
March 2006
SOURCE
McGill Law Journal;Mar2006, Vol. 51 Issue 1, p27
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Informed by a feminist analysis, the author examines a new development in the legal responses to workplace sexual harassment in Quebec. Sexual harassment has been recognized as a psychological injury, compensable through the province's Commission des accidents de travail. This classification was confirmed in the B�liveau-St-Jacques case, in which an alleged victim of workplace sexual harassment filed a civil suit seeking damages from her employer based on both the civil liability regime and the antidiscrimination and anti-harassment clauses of the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms. The Supreme Court of Canada found that Quebec's Act Respecting Industrial Accidents and Occupational Diseases (�AIAOD�) extinguishes the right to all civil remedies for workplace injuries, including punitive damages in cases of intentional and illegal violations of a protected right. This approach was subsequently entrenched in the new psychological harassment provisions of the Labour Standards Act. The author discusses the implications of B�liveau-St-Jacques for victims of sexual harassment, particularly women. While the decision goes far in recognizing the systemic nature of sexual harassment in the workplace, it also somewhat illogically includes violations of fundamental rights within the ambit of �occupational hazards.� Responding to sexual harassment through the no-fault workplace compensation scheme causes the distress and anguish experienced by sexual harassment victims to be assessed as a medical condition. Women become the objects of an administrative regime that causes them to suffer further affronts to their dignity. The author contrasts the legal treatment of sexual harassment with that of a different harm to dignity�defamation, which constitutes a narrow exception to the exclusion of civil remedies under the AIAOD.
ACCESSION #
22378300

 

Related Articles

  • Latina Janitors File Class Action.  // InsideCounsel;Jul2006, Vol. 16 Issue 176, p80 

    The article reports on a class action civil rights lawsuit of women janitors against their employer AMB Industries Inc. for years of sexual harassment. Women janitors were employed by AMB to clean Minneapolis area facilities. They have alleged that a supervisor forced them to engage in sexual...

  • CANADA CEMENT FACTORY.  // Noise & Vibration Bulletin;Apr2008, p105 

    The article reports that the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) is currently hearing an environmental class action lawsuit filed against Saint Lawrence Cement by a group of neighbors in Quebec City. The plaintiffs, who lived near the company's factory, were seeking for compensation damages caused by...

  • CIRCUIT ROUNDUP. Mack, Debbi // Corporate Legal Times;Apr2005, Vol. 15 Issue 161, p56 

    Presents a news roundup pertaining to the legal sector in the United States. New York state appeals court's negation of a suit against the Metropolitan Opera brought by a patron who was injured when a disabled man knocked her down while trying to reach his seat; 6th Circuit's upholding of an...

  • ACCESS TO JUSTICE, JUDICIAL ECONOMY, AND BEHAVIOUR MODIFICATION: EXPLORING THE GOALS OF CANADIAN CLASS ACTIONS. GOOD, MATHEW // Alberta Law Review;Oct2009, Vol. 47 Issue 1, p185 

    The author examines the three goals of class actions in Canada: access to justice, judicial economy, and behaviour modification, with a focus on the preferability inquiry at certification. A comprehensive analysis of the goals is undertaken through an examination of the various law commission...

  • I didn't know I was loaded. Woodard, Joe // Alberta Report / Newsmagazine;11/21/94, Vol. 21 Issue 49, p25 

    Reports on a subsequent case in which the Supreme Court of Canada's controversial decision in the Daviault case, which held that extreme intoxication could be a legitimate defense in criminal cases, has been applied. How Court of Queen's Bench Justice J.H. Mackenzie acquitted Carl Blair of...

  • Standing Apart: Separate Concurrence and the Modern Supreme Court of Canada, 1984-2006. McCormick, Peter // McGill Law Journal;Spring2008, Vol. 53 Issue 1, p137 

    The article focuses on the Modern Supreme Court of Canada, and separate concurrences as a common feature of common law court decisions. From the results of the analysis of the use of separate concurrences by the Supreme Court of Canada under Chief Justices Dickson, Lamer and McLachlin, the...

  • Employee Held to Online Agreement.  // InsideCounsel;Oct2006, Vol. 16 Issue 179, p98 

    The article provides information on the lawsuit Bell versus Hollywood Entertainment Corp. Lasunda Bell filed suit against the video rental chain alleging hostile work environment, sexual harassment and civil battery. Hollywood immediately filed a motion to compel arbitration, claiming Bell...

  • Sommes-nous dignes? L'égalité et l'arrêt Gosselin. Jackman, Martha // Canadian Journal of Women & the Law;2005, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p161 

    The author examines the Supreme Court of Canada's judgment in Gosselin v. Quebec (Attorney General) and considers to what extent this decision represents a step backwards for women's equality in the poverty context. She concludes that the Gosselin case demonstrates yet again that the feminist...

  • MORE DELAYS IN CPP CASE. Gulliver, Tanya // Xtra (Toronto);7/7/2005, Issue 540, p15 

    Reports on the delays regarding the resolution of a class action lawsuit filed by gay and lesbian widows against the Canadian government over the Canadian Pension Plan benefits. Facts of the case; Move of the Supreme Court to agree to hear the federal government's appeal; Initiative of widow...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of NEW JERSEY STATE LIBRARY

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics