TITLE

NEA Reacts to Federal Teacher Qualification Review

PUB. DATE
September 2006
SOURCE
Language Magazine;Sep2006, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p41
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the review of state plans to comply with the highly qualified teacher requirements under the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. The review was released by the U.S. Department of Education. The results show that nine states had submitted plans that met the department's criteria. The department also contends that thirty-nine states partially met the criteria, while the states of Hawaii, Missouri, Utah and Wisconsin failed to meet its criteria.
ACCESSION #
22382479

 

Related Articles

  • We hear from readers. McQuillan, Larry; Failla, Karin // Curriculum Review;May2006, Vol. 45 Issue 9, p2 

    The article reports on the launch of the Web site of the National High School Center at the American Institutes for Research in May 2006. The National School Center which is a part of a national network of Content and Regional Comprehensive Centers funded by the U.S. Department of Education. Its...

  • The Impact of the Pressures to Make Adequate Yearly Progress on Teachers in a Midwest Urban School District: A Qualitative Analysis. Hunt, John W.; Afolayan, Michael; Byrd-Blake, Marie; Fabunmi, Martins; Pryor, Brandt; Aboro, Pereari // Journal of Thought;Fall/Winter 2009, Vol. 44 Issue 3/4, p63 

    The article discusses a study by the Urban Education Research Team on the impact of the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). It analyzes the responses of teachers in four pilot schools including two elementary schools, a middle school and a high school in order to address the issues of student...

  • No Waiver Left Behind. POSEY, LEE // State Legislatures;Jun2014, Vol. 40 Issue 6, p25 

    The article focuses on the expansive federal education law of 2002 known as the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) law for which the U.S. Department of Education has allowed flexibility by granting states waivers from burdensome provisions. Topics discussed include the nature of waivers received by...

  • Contracts Awarded For NCLB Centers. Viadero, Debra // Education Week;10/12/2005, Vol. 25 Issue 7, p20 

    The article focuses on contracts for providing advice to states and school districts on meeting the demands of the educational laws in the U.S. The U.S. Department of Education has awarded contracts for 20 new, comprehensive centers to provide advice to school districts on meeting the demands of...

  • No Child Left Behind Act: States Face Challenges Measuring Academic Growth: GAO-06-948T.  // GAO Reports;7/28/2006, p1 

    The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA) requires that states improve academic performance so that all students reach proficiency in reading and mathematics by 2014 and that achievement gaps close among student groups. States set annual proficiency targets using an approach known as a status model,...

  • No Child Left Behind Act: States Face Challenges Measuring Academic Growth That Education's Initiatives May Help Address: GAO-06-661. Johnson, Henry L. // GAO Reports;7/28/2006, p1 

    The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA) requires that states improve academic performance so that all students reach proficiency in reading and math by 2014 and that achievement gaps close among student groups. States set annual proficiency targets using an approach known as a status model, which...

  • Report: Schools Could Improve on NCLB Tutoring, Choice. Davis, Michelle R. // Education Week;4/12/2006, Vol. 25 Issue 31, p31 

    The article presents a report on the No Child Left Behind Act in the U.S. It is seen that students are not taking advantage of tutoring options under the program. According to the Department of Education, schools identified as needing improvement has nearly doubled in recent years. The report on...

  • NCLB Panel Gathers Views on Testing and Data Collection. Davis, Michelle R. // Education Week;5/17/2006, Vol. 25 Issue 37, p25 

    This article focuses on the observations of the U.S. advocates, who addressed a private panel studying the education law and how to improve it. According to the panelists, the No Child Left Behind Act of the country imposes the wrong kind of testing on schools and educators. The discussion...

  • A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE ON NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND FROM 2001 TO 2010. Husband, Terry; Hunt, Carolyn // Planning & Changing;2015, Vol. 46 Issue 1/2, p212 

    In 2001, the U.S. congress signed the No Child Left Behind bill into law. Arguably, this has been one of the most significant educational reform policies of the 21st century. Much has been written about its effect on students, teachers, curriculum, administrators and others. Nonetheless, a...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics