TITLE

Vatican astronomer's backing of evolution no factor in his exit

PUB. DATE
October 2006
SOURCE
Christian Century;10/3/2006, Vol. 123 Issue 20, p16
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses speculation that George Coyne, former director of the Vatican Observatory, was replaced because of his evolutionary views. Coyne rejects the notion, saying he stepped down voluntarily because the observatory needed fresh leadership. Coyne is a proponent of evolution and regularly clashes with those who argue for intelligent design.
ACCESSION #
22586536

 

Related Articles

  • Clergy argy bargy.  // New Scientist;8/13/2005, Vol. 187 Issue 2512, p4 

    This article reports that a rift has opened up within the Catholic church over the compatibility of the theory of evolution with Christian faith. The Vatican's chief astronomer, the American Jesuit priest George Coyne, has rebuffed controversial comments made by Cardinal Christoph Schönborn...

  • Jews for Darwin: Evolution, Intelligent Design, and Orthodox Judaism. Aviezer, Nathan // Skeptic;2007, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p10 

    The author reflects on the issue of accepting evolution and other areas of science by Orthodox Jew in the U.S. He had argued on the article of Alexander Nussbaum, a writer of "Skeptic Magazine," concerning the rejection of scientific theory of evolution and Intelligent Design. He asserted that...

  • Observatory Head Calls Intelligent Design 'Absurd'  // America;4/10/2006, Vol. 194 Issue 13, p6 

    Reports briefly on an interview conducted George Coyne, the director of the Vatican Observatory, where he called the concept of intelligent design absurd and part of a religious fundamentalist movement in the U.S. which wants science to show that God exists.

  • Nature's God.  // Christian Century;6/12/2007, Vol. 124 Issue 12, p5 

    The article reports on the idea of intelligent design. The debate regarding how intelligent design is taught is discussed. The debate between intelligent design and evolution is also mentioned in the article. The author feels that even though intelligent design cannot be proven, its concepts...

  • Nagel on Religion, Politics and Humanity. OPPY, GRAHAM // Analysis;Jul2010, Vol. 70 Issue 3, p562 

    The article focuses on Thomas Nagel's views on religion, politics and humanity. Nagel believes that intelligent design is a rationally entertainable alternative hypothesis about the origins of life for many who believe in God. It addresses the controversial claims of Nagel on public education...

  • When science and theology meet. Butler, Declan // Nature;9/7/2006, Vol. 443 Issue 7107, p10 

    The article features the age old contradiction between science and religion from Vatican's point of view. Earlier, Pope John Paul has reconciled the faith and science and expressed that the Darwininan evolution is more than a mere hypothesis. However, the pope Benedict XVI, is not yet clear on...

  • The Other Intelligent Design Theories. Brin, David // Skeptic;2006, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p60 

    The article focuses on the importance of intelligent design to Darwinian evolution. Intelligent design demands to be recognized as a direct and scientific competitor with the theory of evolution. Promoters of intelligent design barely try to undermine evolution as a vast model of the world....

  • A Mandate to Teach Stupid Design. Minor, Robert N. // Whosoever;Nov/Dec2005, pN.PAG 

    Focuses on the implementation of a mandate by radical religious right-wing to teach about Intelligent Design in public school science classes in the U.S. Insufficiency of teaching evolutionary theory as a scientific explanation to understand and predict biological change; Need for classes to...

  • Death and Science: The Existential Underpinnings of Belief in Intelligent Design and Discomfort with Evolution. Tracy, Jessica L.; Hart, Joshua; Martens, Jason P. // PLoS ONE;2011, Vol. 6 Issue 3, p1 

    The present research examined the psychological motives underlying widespread support for intelligent design theory (IDT), a purportedly scientific theory that lacks any scientific evidence; and antagonism toward evolutionary theory (ET), a theory supported by a large body of scientific...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics