TITLE

Bucks and Buckley

AUTHOR(S)
Buckley, James L.
PUB. DATE
September 1999
SOURCE
National Review;9/27/1999, Vol. 51 Issue 18, p40
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article reflects on political debates concerning the proposed campaign finance reforms in the U.S. in 1999. The author discussed the content of the Federal Election Campaign Act which defines the limits in the campaign expenses of an independent political candidate. However, changes in the law are proposed by several legislators. In this regard, the proposed amendments to the legislation may create conflict in the political system of the nation as well as promotes reform movements in the country.
ACCESSION #
2280714

 

Related Articles

  • ILLINOIS.  // Campaigns & Elections (1996);Feb2007, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p13 

    The article deals with the need to introduce new campaign finance legislation in Illinois. Controversy surrounding campaign contributions for some state legislative candidates is prompting calls for new campaign finance legislation in the state. Reports show that more than $8 million was...

  • Three Steps Forward, Two Steps Back. Miller, Ellen; Sifry, Micah // American Prospect;1/1/2001, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p8 

    Deals with importance of campaign finance reform legislation in the U.S. as of January 2001. Amount of money spent in the 2000 presidential elections; States which have reformed campaign finance legislation; Factors which hinder the reform of campaign finance legislation in other states such as...

  • ANYTHING BUT TYPICAL. Hansen, Mark // ABA Journal;Sep2003, Vol. 89 Issue 9, p22 

    Details the McConnell versus Federal Election Commission case, the U.S. Supreme Court's review of the constitutionality of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act. Ways in which the case is unusual; Complexity of campaign finance statutes; Rule under the McCain-Feingold Act, a campaign finance law.

  • LOOPHOLE ADVOCACY. Schneider, William // National Journal;3/20/2004, Vol. 36 Issue 12, p920 

    Analyzes the limitations in the U.S. campaign finance law passed in 2002 to regulate the campaign funds of political parties in the country. Major provision of the law; Issues on the funding practices of the 527 campaign organizations; Information on the law signed by former President Bill...

  • Campaign Deform Act.  // National Review;6/03/1996, Vol. 48 Issue 10, p16 

    The article focuses on the McCain-Feingold legislation to reform campaign-financing in the U.S. The legislation assumes a public clamor for campaign-finance reform which Washington ignores only at its peril. But opposition for campaign-finance reform occurs only in Washington itself. The bill...

  • Can We Clean Up The Act? Buckley, Jr., William F. // National Review;10/27/1997, Vol. 49 Issue 20, p62 

    The article focuses on a bill proposed by U.S. Senator John McCain emphasizing the need to reform campaign finance in the U.S. The bill is being opposed by the majority of Senate Republicans. It stresses to outlaw soft money. The Republicans are demanding a bill to which the modifier reform can...

  • The Elusive Goal Of Campaign Reform. Walters, Ida // National Review;5/30/1980, Vol. 32 Issue 11, p663 

    The article comments on campaign finance in line with election-law reform in the U.S. It criticizes the funds from political action committees. The purpose of campaign reform in line with political participation of ordinary citizens is stated. An overview of the results of campaign reform is...

  • How Do You Like It Now? York, Byron // National Review;9/15/2003, Vol. 55 Issue 17, p22 

    This article focuses on the consequences of the passage of the McCain-Feingold campaign-finance-reform bill in the U.S. Michigan's Democratic senator Carl Levin predicted that the political landscape will change when this bill takes effect. The bill was passed on March 20, 2002. The law has led...

  • The Limits of Limits. Chapman, Stephen // New Republic;10/13/79, Vol. 181 Issue 15, p12 

    Comments that the federal campaign reforms initiated in the aftermath of the Watergate scandal in the United States, failed to produced the intended results. Failure to limit the amount of special interest money in campaigns; Reduction of the opportunity of challengers to unseat entrenched...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics