TITLE

Phasing-Out of Nuclear Power in Sweden

AUTHOR(S)
Wiwen-Nilsson, Tore
PUB. DATE
August 2006
SOURCE
Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law;Aug2006, Vol. 24 Issue 3, p355
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
After the Chernobyl accident in 1986, the Swedish Parliament decided that nuclear power production should gradually be phased out. In 1997, the Act on Phasing-Out Nuclear Power was passed. This Act empowers the Swedish Government to decide to close nuclear reactors. Under Act, the owner of a reactor, which is closed, is entitled to compensation from the state. On 5 February 1998, the Government decided to close one reactor in Barsebäck. The owner of the reactor and its parents challenged the legality of the Government's decision. The applicants alleged, inter alia, that the decision violated the Instrument of Government, the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, EC law and the Energy Charter Treaty. On 16 June 1999, the Supreme Administrative Court rejected the complaints. Sydkraft AB then brought complaints to the European Commission alleging, inter alia, that the Supreme Administrative Court had failed to refer to the European Court of Justice questions of interpretation of Article 86(1) and under the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive. An agreement for compensation was entered into in November 1999. In 2002, the European Commission found that Sweden had not complied with its obligations under the EIA Directive. In December 2004, the Government decided to close Barsebäck 2, which decision resulted in a further agreement on compensation.
ACCESSION #
22981136

 

Related Articles

  • Chernobyl challenge. Higham, Steve // International Construction;Jul/Aug2001, Vol. 40 Issue 6, p33 

    Focuses on the impact of the Chernobyl nuclear accident on the environment in Ukraine. Stabilization of the structure on the nuclear facilities; Selection of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development to implement Shelter Implementation Plan; Availability of the storage and disposal...

  • What happened at Reactor Four. Thompson, Gordon // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Aug/Sep1986, Vol. 42 Issue 7, p26 

    Analyzes the factors that contribute to the nuclear reactor accident that occurred in April 1986 in Chornobyl, Ukraine. Description of the conditions that lead to the accident; Importance of identifying the particular characteristics of the reactor to understand the nature of the accident;...

  • Chernobyl: the political fall-out continues. Pearce, Fred // UNESCO Courier;Oct2000, Vol. 53 Issue 10, p10 

    Focuses on the political implications of the nuclear reactor explosion that happened in Chernobyl, Ukraine in 1986. Estimated number of deaths due to the incident; Controversy surrounding the casualty list of the disaster; Diseases associated with the disaster. INSET: The world's first...

  • Waxman likens Japan disaster to Chernobyl. Fabian, Jordan // Hill;3/17/2011, Vol. 18 Issue 37, p18 

    The article reports on the belief of California Representative Henry Waxman that the nuclear crisis in 2011 in Japan is similar to the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in Ukraine.

  • The next Chernobyl? Cooperman, Alan // U.S. News & World Report;4/29/96, Vol. 120 Issue 17, p46 

    Worries that reopening of the Metsamor nuclear reactor in Armenia may be an invitation to disaster. Comparisons to the 1986 disaster at Chernobyl; The world's most dangerous reactors; Why the Armenian reactor has attracted the most attention; Worries about the reactor's maintenance during its...

  • Chernobyl reactor confinement: a drone's eye view.  // Engineer (Online Edition);12/10/2015, p5 

    The article focuses on a video featuring aerial footage of developments in the construction of the New Safe Confinement arch that will shelter the damaged nuclear reactor 4 at Chernobyl, Ukraine upon completion in late 2017 to prevent the release of contaminated material from the present shelter.

  • The implications of Fukushima: The European perspective. Jorant, Caroline // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jul2011, Vol. 67 Issue 4, p14 

    The effects of the tragedy at Japan’s Fukushima power plant will continue to reverberate over the upcoming weeks, months, and years. And, as the writers in this symposium explain, the consequences of the disaster go beyond Japan—like Chernobyl and Three Mile Island, Fukushima will...

  • Environmental monitoring and public dose assessment around the Tokai Reprocessing Plant. Shinohara, K. // Journal of Radioanalytical & Nuclear Chemistry;Jun2004, Vol. 260 Issue 3, p563 

    Radiological effects to the regional environment around Tokai Reprocessing Plant (TRP) were assessed using both actual environmental radiological monitoring data and doses estimated by mathematical models. The environmental monitoring showed no increase of radiological level except for the...

  • Short and medium effects on the environment of Valencia, Spain, of the chernobyl nuclear plant accident. Moreno, A.; Navarro, E.; Senent, F.; Baeza, A.; Miró, C.; Río, M. // Bulletin of Environmental Contamination & Toxicology;Jan1991, Vol. 46 Issue 1, p14 

    The article presents a study which examines the environmental impact of the April 26, 1986 accident at the Chernobyl nuclear plant in Valencia, Spain. The study examines aerosols collected on SM-I1405 cellulose nitrate filters and were analyzed using gamma spectrometry. The study shows that...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of NEW JERSEY STATE LIBRARY

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics